arXiv++ Combinatorics

The \textsc{Dominating Set} problem is a classical and extensively studied topic in graph theory and theoretical computer science. In this paper, we examine the algorithmic complexity of several well-known exact-distance variants of domination, namely \textsc{$r$-Step Domination}, \textsc{$r$-Hop Domination}, and \textsc{$r$-Hop Roman Domination}. Let $G$ be a graph and let $r \geq 2$ be an integer. A set $S \subseteq V(G)$ is an \emph{$r$-hop dominating set} if every vertex in $V(G)\setminus S$ is at distance exactly $r$ from some vertex of $S$. Similarly, $S$ is an \emph{$r$-step dominating set} if every vertex of $G$ lies at distance exactly $r$ from at least one vertex of $S$. An \emph{$r$-hop Roman dominating function} on $G$ is a function $f \colon V(G)\to\{0,1,2\}$ such that for every vertex $v$ with $f(v)=0$, there exists a vertex $u$ at distance exactly $r$ from $v$ with $f(u)=2$. The \emph{weight} of $f$ is defined as $f(V)=\sum_{v\in V(G)} f(v)$. The \textsc{$r$-Hop Domination} (respectively, \textsc{$r$-Step Domination}) problem asks whether $G$ admits an $r$-hop dominating set (respectively, $r$-step dominating set) of size at most $k$, while the \textsc{$r$-Hop Roman Domination} problem asks whether $G$ admits an $r$-hop Roman dominating function of weight at most $k$. It is known that for every $r\ge 2$, the problems \textsc{$r$-Step Domination}, \textsc{$r$-Hop Domination}, and \textsc{$r$-Hop Roman Domination} are \textsc{NP}-complete. First we prove that for all $r\ge 2$, \textsc{$r$-Hop Roman Domination} is \textsc{W[2]}-complete. Furthermore, for every $r\ge 2$, \textsc{$r$-Step Domination} and \textsc{$r$-Hop Domination} remain \textsc{W[2]}-hard even when restricted to bipartite graphs and chordal graphs. Unless the ETH fails, none of these problems admits an algorithm running in time $2^{o(n+m)}$ on graphs with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges.

A set $D$ of vertices in a graph $G = (V, E)$ is a locating-dominating set (LD-set) if it is dominating and every two vertices $u$, $v$ of $V\setminus D$ satisfy $N(u) \cap D \neq N(v) \cap D$. Two disjoint sets $A,B\subset V(G)$ form a locating-dominating coalition (for short, an LD-coalition) in $G$ if none of them is an LD-set in $G$ but their union $A\cup B$ is an LD-set. A locating-dominating coalition partition (for short, an LDC-partition) is a vertex partition $Π$ such that every set of $Π$ is not an LD-set in $G,$ but forms an LD-coalition with another set of $Π$. The locating-domination coalition number of $G$, denoted by $C_{L}(G),$ equals the maximum cardinality of an LDC-partition of $G$. Our purpose in this paper is to initiate the study of locating-dominating coalitions in graphs. We first investigate the existence of LDC-partitions. We also obtain lower and upper bounds on $C_{L}(G)$. We characterize connected graphs $G$ of order $n\ge 3$ satisfying $C_L(G) = n,$ as well as those trees $T$ such that $C_L(T)=n-1$. In addition, we determine the exact values of $C_L(G)$ for some classes of graphs. Moreover, we investigate the computational complexity of the decision problem associated with locating-dominating coalition partitions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that addresses the algorithmic complexity of a decision problem related to coalition partitions, not only for this locating-dominating model but for coalition partitions in general.

Subgraph complementation is an operation that toggles all adjacencies inside a selected vertex set. Given a graph \(G\) and a target class \(\mathcal{C}\), the Minimum Subgraph Complementation problem asks for a minimum-size vertex set \(S\) such that complementing the subgraph induced by \(S\) transforms \(G\) into a graph belonging to \(\mathcal{C}\). While the decision version of Subgraph Complementation has been extensively studied and is NP-complete for many graph classes, the algorithmic complexity of its optimization variant has remained largely unexplored. In this paper, we study MSC from an algorithmic perspective. We present polynomial-time algorithms for MSC in several nontrivial settings. Our results include polynomial-time solvability for transforming graphs between bipartite, co-bipartite, and split graphs, as well as for complementing bipartite regular graphs into chordal graphs. We also show that MSC to the class of graphs of fixed degeneracy can be solved in polynomial time when the input graph is a forest. Moreover, we investigate MSC with respect to connectivity and prove that MSC to the class of disconnected graphs and to the class of 2-connected graphs can be solved in polynomial time for arbitrary inputs.

For a graph (undirected, directed, or mixed), a cycle-factor is a collection of vertex-disjoint cycles covering the entire vertex set. Cycle-factors subject to parity constraints arise naturally in the study of structural graph theory and algorithmic complexity. In this work, we study four variants of the problem of finding a cycle-factor subject to parity constraints: (1) all cycles are odd, (2) all cycles are even, (3) at least one cycle is odd, and (4) at least one cycle is even. These variants are considered in the undirected, directed, and mixed settings. We show that all but the fourth problem are NP-complete in all settings, while the complexity of the fourth one remains open for the directed and undirected cases. We also show that in mixed graphs, even deciding the existence of any cycle factor is NP-complete.

A homeomorphically irreducible spanning tree (HIST) is a spanning tree with no degree-2 vertices, serving as a structurally minimal backbone of a graph. While the existence of HISTs has been widely studied from a structural perspective, the algorithmic complexity of finding them remains less understood. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive investigation of the HIST problem from both structural and algorithmic viewpoints. We present a simple characterization that precisely describes which chordal graphs of diameter at most~3 admit a HIST, leading to a polynomial-time decision procedure for this class. In contrast, we show that the problem is NP-complete for strongly chordal graphs of diameter~4. From the perspective of parameterized complexity, we establish that the HIST problem is W[1]-hard when parameterized by clique-width, indicating that the problem is unlikely to be efficiently solvable in general dense graphs. On the other hand, we present fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithms when parameterized by treewidth, modular-width, or cluster vertex deletion number. Specifically, we develop an $O^*(4^{k})$-time algorithm parameterized by modular-width~$k$, and an FPT algorithm parameterized by the cluster vertex deletion number based on kernelization techniques that bound clique sizes while preserving the existence of a HIST. These results together provide a clearer understanding of the structural and computational boundaries of the HIST problem.

We introduce achievement positional games, a convention for positional games which encompasses the Maker-Maker and Maker-Breaker conventions. We consider two hypergraphs, one red and one blue, on the same vertex set. Two players, Left and Right, take turns picking a previously unpicked vertex. Whoever first fills an edge of their color, blue for Left or red for Right, wins the game (draws are possible). We establish general properties of such games. In particular, we show that a lot of principles which hold for Maker-Maker games generalize to achievement positional games. We also study the algorithmic complexity of deciding whether Left has a winning strategy as first player when all blue edges have size at mot $p$ and all red edges have size at most $q$. This problem is in P for $p,q \leq 2$, but it is NP-hard for $p \geq 3$ and $q=2$, coNP-complete for $p=2$ and $q \geq 3$, and PSPACE-complete for $p,q \geq 3$. A consequence of this last result is that, in the Maker-Maker convention, deciding whether the first player has a winning strategy on a hypergraph of rank 4 after one round of (non-optimal) play is PSPACE-complete.

Immersion minor is an important variant of graph minor, defined through an injective mapping from vertices in a smaller graph $H$ to vertices in a larger graph $G$ where adjacent elements of the former are connected in the latter by edge-disjoint paths. Here, we consider the immersion problem in the emerging field of hypergraphs. We first define hypergraph immersion by extending the injective mapping to hypergraphs. We then prove that finding a hypergraph immersion is fixed-parameter tractable, namely, there exists an $O(N^6)$ polynomial-time algorithm to determine whether a fixed hypergraph $H$ can be immersed in a hypergraph $G$ with $N$ vertices. Additionally, we present the dual hypergraph immersion problem and provide further characteristics of the algorithmic complexity.

Given a graph $G=(V,E)$, a function $f:V\to \{0,1,2\}$ is said to be a \emph{Roman Dominating function} if for every $v\in V$ with $f(v)=0$, there exists a vertex $u\in N(v)$ such that $f(u)=2$. A Roman Dominating function $f$ is said to be an \emph{Independent Roman Dominating function} (or IRDF), if $V_1\cup V_2$ forms an independent set, where $V_i=\{v\in V~\vert~f(v)=i\}$, for $i\in \{0,1,2\}$. The total weight of $f$ is equal to $\sum_{v\in V} f(v)$, and is denoted as $w(f)$. The \emph{Independent Roman Domination Number} of $G$, denoted by $i_R(G)$, is defined as min$\{w(f)~\vert~f$ is an IRDF of $G\}$. For a given graph $G$, the problem of computing $i_R(G)$ is defined as the \emph{Minimum Independent Roman Domination problem}. The problem is already known to be NP-hard for bipartite graphs. In this paper, we further study the algorithmic complexity of the problem. In this paper, we propose a polynomial-time algorithm to solve the Minimum Independent Roman Domination problem for distance-hereditary graphs, split graphs, and $P_4$-sparse graphs.

Let $G=(V,E)$ be an undirected graph. The graph burning is defined as follows: at time $t=0$, all vertices in $G$ are unburned. For each time $t\geq 1$, an unburned vertex is chosen to burn, and at each subsequent time, the fire spreads from each burned vertex to all its neighbors. Once a vertex is burned, it remains burned for all future steps. The process continues until all vertices in $V$ are burned. The burning number of a graph $G$, denoted $b(G)$, is the smallest integer $k$ such that there exists a sequence of vertices $(v_1,v_2,\ldots, v_k)\subseteq V$, where $v_i$ is burned at time $i$, and all vertices in $V$ are burned within time step $k$. The Burning Number problem asks whether the burning number of an input graph $G$ is at most $k$ or not. In this paper, we study the Burning Number problem both from an algorithmic and a structural point of view. The Burning Number problem is known to be NP-complete for interval graphs. Here, we prove that this problem is NP-complete even when restricted to connected proper interval graphs. The well-known burning number conjecture asserts that all the vertices of a graph of order $n$ can be burned in $\lceil \sqrt{n}~\rceil$ steps. In line with this conjecture, the upper and lower bounds of $b(G)$ are well-studied for various graph classes. Here, we provide an improved upper bound for the burning number of connected $P_k$-free graphs and show that the bound is tight up to an additive constant $1$. Finally, we study two variants of the problem, namely edge burning (only edges are burned) and total burning (both vertices and edges are burned). In particular, we establish their relationship with the burning number problem and evaluate the algorithmic complexity of these variants.

Signed graphs have been introduced to enrich graph structures expressing relationships between persons or general social entities, introducing edge signs to reflect the nature of the relationship, e.g., friendship or enmity. Independently, offensive alliances have been defined and studied for undirected, unsigned graphs. We join both lines of research and define offensive alliances in signed graphs, hence considering the nature of relationships. Apart from some combinatorial results, mainly on k-balanced and k-anti-balanced signed graphs (where the latter is a newly introduced family of signed graphs), we focus on the algorithmic complexity of finding smallest offensive alliances, looking at a number of parameterizations. While the parameter solution size leads to an FPT result for unsigned graphs, we obtain W[2]-completeness for the signed setting. We introduce new parameters for signed graphs, e.g., distance to weakly balanced signed graphs, that could be of independent interest. We show that these parameters yield FPT results. Here, we make use of the recently introduced parameter neighborhood diversity for signed graphs.

The method is based on the preliminary transformation of the traditionally used matrices or adjacency lists in the graph theory into refined projections free from redundant information, and their subsequent use in constructing shortest paths. Unlike adjacency matrices and lists based on enumerating binary adjacency relations, the refined projection is based on enumerating more complex relations: simple paths from a given graph vertex that are shortest. The preliminary acquisition of such projections reduces the algorithmic complexity of applications using them and improves their volumetric and real-time characteristics to linear ones for a pair of vertices. The class of graphs considered is extended to mixed graphs.

In this paper, we deal with hamiltonicity in planar cubic graphs G having a facial 2-factor Q via (quasi) spanning trees of faces in G/Q and study the algorithmic complexity of finding such (quasi) spanning trees of faces. Moreover, we show that if Barnette's Conjecture is false, then hamiltonicity in 3-connected planar cubic bipartite graphs is an NP-complete problem.

Search trees on trees (STTs) generalize the fundamental binary search tree (BST) data structure: in STTs the underlying search space is an arbitrary tree, whereas in BSTs it is a path. An optimal BST of size $n$ can be computed for a given distribution of queries in $O(n^2)$ time [Knuth 1971] and centroid BSTs provide a nearly-optimal alternative, computable in $O(n)$ time [Mehlhorn 1977]. By contrast, optimal STTs are not known to be computable in polynomial time, and the fastest constant-approximation algorithm runs in $O(n^3)$ time [Berendsohn, Kozma 2022]. Centroid trees can be defined for STTs analogously to BSTs, and they have been used in a wide range of algorithmic applications. In the unweighted case (i.e., for a uniform distribution of queries), a centroid tree can be computed in $O(n)$ time [Brodal et al. 2001; Della Giustina et al. 2019]. These algorithms, however, do not readily extend to the weighted case. Moreover, no approximation guarantees were previously known for centroid trees in either the unweighted or weighted cases. In this paper we revisit centroid trees in a general, weighted setting, and we settle both the algorithmic complexity of constructing them, and the quality of their approximation. For constructing a weighted centroid tree, we give an output-sensitive $O(n\log h)\subseteq O(n\log n)$ time algorithm, where $h$ is the height of the resulting centroid tree. If the weights are of polynomial complexity, the running time is $O(n\log\log n)$. We show these bounds to be optimal, in a general decision tree model of computation. For approximation, we prove that the cost of a centroid tree is at most twice the optimum, and this guarantee is best possible, both in the weighted and unweighted cases. We also give tight, fine-grained bounds on the approximation-ratio for bounded-degree trees and on the approximation-ratio of more general $α$-centroid trees.

The purpose of this article is to study the algorithmic complexity of the Besicovitch stability of noisy subshifts of finite type, a notion studied in a previous article. First, we exhibit an unstable aperiodic tiling, and then see how it can serve as a building block to implement several reductions from classical undecidable problems on Turing machines. It will follow that the question of stability of subshifts of finite type is undecidable, and the strongest lower bound we obtain in the arithmetical hierarchy is $Π_2$-hardness. Lastly, we prove that this decision problem, which requires to quantify over an uncountable set of probability measures, has a $Π_4$ upper bound.

We study the algorithmic complexity of fair division problems with a focus on minimizing the number of queries needed to find an approximate solution with desired accuracy. We show for several classes of fair division problems that under certain natural conditions on sets of preferences, a logarithmic number of queries with respect to accuracy is sufficient.

Given a digraph $G$, a set $X\subseteq V(G)$ is said to be absorbing set (resp. dominating set) if every vertex in the graph is either in $X$ or is an in-neighbour (resp. out-neighbour) of a vertex in $X$. A set $S\subseteq V(G)$ is said to be an independent set if no two vertices in $S$ are adjacent in $G$. A kernel (resp. solution) of $G$ is an independent and absorbing (resp. dominating) set in $G$. We explore the algorithmic complexity of these problems in the well known class of interval digraphs. A digraph $G$ is an interval digraph if a pair of intervals $(S_u,T_u)$ can be assigned to each vertex $u$ of $G$ such that $(u,v)\in E(G)$ if and only if $S_u\cap T_v\neq\emptyset$. Many different subclasses of interval digraphs have been defined and studied in the literature by restricting the kinds of pairs of intervals that can be assigned to the vertices. We observe that several of these classes, like interval catch digraphs, interval nest digraphs, adjusted interval digraphs and chronological interval digraphs, are subclasses of the more general class of reflexive interval digraphs -- which arise when we require that the two intervals assigned to a vertex have to intersect. We show that all the problems mentioned above are efficiently solvable, in most of the cases even linear-time solvable, in the class of reflexive interval digraphs, but are APX-hard on even the very restricted class of interval digraphs called point-point digraphs, where the two intervals assigned to each vertex are required to be degenerate, i.e. they consist of a single point each. The results we obtain improve and generalize several existing algorithms and structural results for subclasses of reflexive interval digraphs.

Graph burning is a deterministic, discrete-time process that models how influence or contagion spreads in a graph. Associated to each graph is its burning number, which is a parameter that quantifies how quickly the influence spreads. We survey results on graph burning, focusing on bounds, conjectures, and algorithms related to the burning number. We will discuss state-of-the-art results on the burning number conjecture, burning numbers of graph classes, and algorithmic complexity. We include a list of conjectures, variants, and open problems on graph burning.

In this paper, we present a novel algorithm and its three variations for solving the Rubik's cube more efficiently. This algorithm can be used to solve the complete $n \times n \times n$ cube in $O(\frac{n^2}{\log n})$ moves. This algorithm can also be useful in certain cases for speedcubers. We will prove that our algorithm always works and then perform a basic analysis on the algorithm to determine its algorithmic complexity of $O(n^2)$. Finally, we further optimize this complexity to $O(\frac{n^2}{\log n})$.

Let $G = (V,E)$ be a simple, undirected and connected graph. A connected (total) dominating set $S \subseteq V$ is a secure connected (total) dominating set of $G$, if for each $ u \in V \setminus S$, there exists $v \in S$ such that $uv \in E$ and $(S \setminus \lbrace v \rbrace) \cup \lbrace u \rbrace $ is a connected (total) dominating set of $G$. The minimum cardinality of a secure connected (total) dominating set of $G$ denoted by $ γ_{sc} (G) (γ_{st}(G))$, is called the secure connected (total) domination number of $G$. In this paper, we show that the decision problems corresponding to secure connected domination number and secure total domination number are NP-complete even when restricted to split graphs or bipartite graphs. The NP-complete reductions also show that these problems are w[2]-hard. We also prove that the secure connected domination problem is linear time solvable in block graphs and threshold graphs.

We study algorithmic complexity of solving subtraction games in a~fixed dimension with a finite difference set. We prove that there exists a game in this class such that any algorithm solving the game runs in exponential time. Also we prove an existence of a game in this class such that solving the game is PSPACE-hard. The results are based on the construction introduced by Larsson and Wästlund. It relates subtraction games and cellular automata.