arXiv++ Combinatorics

A homeomorphically irreducible spanning tree (HIST) is a spanning tree with no degree-2 vertices, serving as a structurally minimal backbone of a graph. While the existence of HISTs has been widely studied from a structural perspective, the algorithmic complexity of finding them remains less understood. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive investigation of the HIST problem from both structural and algorithmic viewpoints. We present a simple characterization that precisely describes which chordal graphs of diameter at most~3 admit a HIST, leading to a polynomial-time decision procedure for this class. In contrast, we show that the problem is NP-complete for strongly chordal graphs of diameter~4. From the perspective of parameterized complexity, we establish that the HIST problem is W[1]-hard when parameterized by clique-width, indicating that the problem is unlikely to be efficiently solvable in general dense graphs. On the other hand, we present fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithms when parameterized by treewidth, modular-width, or cluster vertex deletion number. Specifically, we develop an $O^*(4^{k})$-time algorithm parameterized by modular-width~$k$, and an FPT algorithm parameterized by the cluster vertex deletion number based on kernelization techniques that bound clique sizes while preserving the existence of a HIST. These results together provide a clearer understanding of the structural and computational boundaries of the HIST problem.

A tree is said to be even if for every pair of distinct leaves, the length of the unique path between them is even. In this paper we discuss the problem of determining whether an input graph has a spanning even tree. Hofmann and Walsh [Australas. J Comb. 35, 2006] proved that this problem can be solved in polynomial time on bipartite graphs. In contrast to this, we show that this problem is NP-complete even on planar graphs. We also give polynomial-time algorithms for several restricted classes of graphs, such as split graphs, cographs, cobipartite graphs, unit interval graphs, and block graphs.

Given a graph $G$ and two spanning trees $T$ and $T'$ in $G$, Spanning Tree Reconfiguration asks whether there is a step-by-step transformation from $T$ to $T'$ such that all intermediates are also spanning trees of $G$, by exchanging an edge in $T$ with an edge outside $T$ at a single step. This problem is naturally related to matroid theory, which shows that there always exists such a transformation for any pair of $T$ and $T'$. Motivated by this example, we study the problem of transforming a sequence of spanning trees into another sequence of spanning trees. We formulate this problem in the language of matroid theory: Given two sequences of bases of matroids, the goal is to decide whether there is a transformation between these sequences. We design a polynomial-time algorithm for this problem, even if the matroids are given as basis oracles. To complement this algorithmic result, we show that the problem of finding a shortest transformation is NP-hard to approximate within a factor of $c \log n$ for some constant $c > 0$, where $n$ is the total size of the ground sets of the input matroids.

We show that for every $n$-vertex graph with at least one edge, its treewidth is greater than or equal to $n λ_{2} / (Δ+ λ_{2}) - 1$, where $Δ$ and $λ_{2}$ are the maximum degree and the second smallest Laplacian eigenvalue of the graph, respectively. This lower bound improves the one by Chandran and Subramanian [Inf. Process. Lett., 2003] and the subsequent one by the authors of the present paper [IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst., 2024]. The new lower bound is almost tight in the sense that there is an infinite family of graphs such that the lower bound is only $1$ less than the treewidth for each graph in the family. Additionally, using similar techniques, we also present a lower bound of treewidth in terms of the largest and the second smallest Laplacian eigenvalues.

A graph is $d$-orientable if its edges can be oriented so that the maximum in-degree of the resulting digraph is at most $d$. $d$-orientability is a well-studied concept with close connections to fundamental graph-theoretic notions and applications as a load balancing problem. In this paper we consider the d-ORIENTABLE DELETION problem: given a graph $G=(V,E)$, delete the minimum number of vertices to make $G$ $d$-orientable. We contribute a number of results that improve the state of the art on this problem. Specifically: - We show that the problem is W[2]-hard and $\log n$-inapproximable with respect to $k$, the number of deleted vertices. This closes the gap in the problem's approximability. - We completely characterize the parameterized complexity of the problem on chordal graphs: it is FPT parameterized by $d+k$, but W-hard for each of the parameters $d,k$ separately. - We show that, under the SETH, for all $d,ε$, the problem does not admit a $(d+2-ε)^{tw}$, algorithm where $tw$ is the graph's treewidth, resolving as a special case an open problem on the complexity of PSEUDOFOREST DELETION. - We show that the problem is W-hard parameterized by the input graph's clique-width. Complementing this, we provide an algorithm running in time $d^{O(d\cdot cw)}$, showing that the problem is FPT by $d+cw$, and improving the previously best known algorithm for this case.