arXiv++ Combinatorics

For a graph $ G = (V, E) $ with a vertex set $ V $ and an edge set $ E $, a function $ f : V \rightarrow \{0, 1, 2, . . . , diam(G)\} $ is called a \emph{broadcast} on $ G $. For each vertex $ u \in V $, if there exists a vertex $ v $ in $ G $ (possibly, $ u = v $) such that $ f (v) > 0 $ and $ d(u, v) \leq f (v) $, then $ f $ is called a dominating broadcast on $ G $. The cost of the dominating broadcast $f$ is the quantity $ \sum_{v\in V}f(v) $. The minimum cost of a dominating broadcast is the broadcast domination number of $G$, denoted by $ γ_{b}(G) $. A multipacking is a set $ M \subseteq V $ in a graph $ G = (V, E) $ such that for every vertex $ v \in V $ and for every integer $ r \geq 1 $, the ball of radius $ r $ around $ v $ contains at most $ r $ vertices of $ M $, that is, there are at most $ r $ vertices in $ M $ at a distance at most $ r $ from $ v $ in $ G $. The multipacking number of $ G $ is the maximum cardinality of a multipacking of $ G $ and is denoted by $ mp(G) $. It is known that $mp(G)\leqγ_b(G)$. In 2014, Hartnell and Mynhardt proved that $γ_b(G)\leq 3mp(G)-2$ whenever $mp(G)\geq2$. In 2019, Beaudou, Brewster, and Foucaud improved this bound to $γ_b(G)\leq 2 mp(G)+3$ and conjectured that $γ_b(G)\leq 2 mp(G)$. We solve their conjecture by proving that $γ_b(G)\leq 2 mp(G)$ for every graph $G$. Our proof is constructive and yields a polynomial-time $2$-approximation algorithm for Maximum Multipacking problem which improves the earlier approximation factor $2+o(1)$.

The domination problem is a well-studied problem in graph theory. In this paper, we study two natural variants: the hop domination problem and the $2$-step domination problem. Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V$ and edge set $E$. For a graph $G$, a subset $S \subseteq V(G)$ is called an \emph{hop dominating set} if every vertex not in $S$ lies at distance of exactly $2$ from at least one vertex in $S$. For $v\in V(G)$, let $N(v,2)$ denote the set of vertices in $V(G)$ that are at distance exactly $2$ from $v$. For a graph $G$, a subset $S \subseteq V(G)$ is called an \emph{$2$-step dominating set} if every vertex $v\in V(G)$ lies at a distance of exactly $2$ from at least one vertex in $S$. The \textsc{Hop Domination} (HD) problem and the \textsc{$2$-Step Domination} ($2$SD) problems ask whether a graph contains a hop domination set or a $2$-step domination set of size at most $k$, respectively. We study the computational complexity of these problems, and show that both are NP-complete, even when restricted to $d$-regular graphs for every $d\geq 3$, claw-free graphs and also unit disk graphs.

The \textsc{Dominating Set} problem is a classical and extensively studied topic in graph theory and theoretical computer science. In this paper, we examine the algorithmic complexity of several well-known exact-distance variants of domination, namely \textsc{$r$-Step Domination}, \textsc{$r$-Hop Domination}, and \textsc{$r$-Hop Roman Domination}. Let $G$ be a graph and let $r \geq 2$ be an integer. A set $S \subseteq V(G)$ is an \emph{$r$-hop dominating set} if every vertex in $V(G)\setminus S$ is at distance exactly $r$ from some vertex of $S$. Similarly, $S$ is an \emph{$r$-step dominating set} if every vertex of $G$ lies at distance exactly $r$ from at least one vertex of $S$. An \emph{$r$-hop Roman dominating function} on $G$ is a function $f \colon V(G)\to\{0,1,2\}$ such that for every vertex $v$ with $f(v)=0$, there exists a vertex $u$ at distance exactly $r$ from $v$ with $f(u)=2$. The \emph{weight} of $f$ is defined as $f(V)=\sum_{v\in V(G)} f(v)$. The \textsc{$r$-Hop Domination} (respectively, \textsc{$r$-Step Domination}) problem asks whether $G$ admits an $r$-hop dominating set (respectively, $r$-step dominating set) of size at most $k$, while the \textsc{$r$-Hop Roman Domination} problem asks whether $G$ admits an $r$-hop Roman dominating function of weight at most $k$. It is known that for every $r\ge 2$, the problems \textsc{$r$-Step Domination}, \textsc{$r$-Hop Domination}, and \textsc{$r$-Hop Roman Domination} are \textsc{NP}-complete. First we prove that for all $r\ge 2$, \textsc{$r$-Hop Roman Domination} is \textsc{W[2]}-complete. Furthermore, for every $r\ge 2$, \textsc{$r$-Step Domination} and \textsc{$r$-Hop Domination} remain \textsc{W[2]}-hard even when restricted to bipartite graphs and chordal graphs. Unless the ETH fails, none of these problems admits an algorithm running in time $2^{o(n+m)}$ on graphs with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges.

In this paper, we consider the problem of counting almost empty monochromatic triangles in colored planar point sets, that is, triangles whose vertices are all assigned the same color and that contain only a few interior points. Specifically, we show that any $c$-coloring of a set of $n$ points in the plane in general position (that is, no three on a line) contains $Ω(n^2)$ monochromatic triangles with at most $c-1$ interior points and $Ω(n^{\frac{4}{3}})$ monochromatic triangles with at most $c-2$ interior points, for any fixed $c \geq 2$. The latter, in particular, generalizes the result of Pach and Tóth (2013) on the number of monochromatic empty triangles in 2-colored point sets, to the setting of multiple colors and monochromatic triangles with a few interior points. We also derive the limiting value of the expected number of triangles with $s$ interior points in random point sets, for any integer $s \geq 0$. As a result, we obtain the expected number of monochromatic triangles with at most $s$ interior points in random colorings of random point sets.

Here we study the multipacking problems for geometric point sets with respect to their Euclidean distances. We consider a set of $n$ points $P$ and define $N_s[v]$ as the subset of $P$ that includes the $s$ nearest points of $v \in P$ and the point $v$ itself. We assume that the \emph{$s$-th neighbor} of each point is unique, for every $s \in \{0, 1, 2, \dots , n-1\}$. For a natural number $r \leq n-1$, an $r$-multipacking is a set $ M \subseteq P $ such that for each point $ v \in P $ and for every integer $ 1\leq s \leq r $, $|N_s[v]\cap M|\leq (s+1)/2$. The $r$-multipacking number of $ P $ is the maximum cardinality of an $r$-multipacking of $ P $ and is denoted by $ \MP_{r}(P) $. For $r=n-1$, an $r$-multipacking is called a multipacking and $r$-multipacking number is called as multipacking number. For $r=1 \text{ and } 2$, we study the problem of computing a maximum $r$-multipacking of the point sets in $\mathbb{R}^2$. We show that a maximum $1$-multipacking can be computed in polynomial time but computing a maximum $2$-multipacking is \textsc{NP-hard}. Further, we provide approximation and parameterized solutions to the $2$-multipacking problem.

For a graph $ G = (V, E) $ with a vertex set $ V $ and an edge set $ E $, a function $ f : V \rightarrow \{0, 1, 2, . . . , diam(G)\} $ is called a \emph{broadcast} on $ G $. For each vertex $ u \in V $, if there exists a vertex $ v $ in $ G $ (possibly, $ u = v $) such that $ f (v) > 0 $ and $ d(u, v) \leq f (v) $, then $ f $ is called a dominating broadcast on $ G $. The cost of the dominating broadcast $f$ is the quantity $ \sum_{v\in V}f(v) $. The minimum cost of a dominating broadcast is the broadcast domination number of $G$, denoted by $ γ_{b}(G) $. A multipacking is a set $ S \subseteq V $ in a graph $ G = (V, E) $ such that for every vertex $ v \in V $ and for every integer $ r \geq 1 $, the ball of radius $ r $ around $ v $ contains at most $ r $ vertices of $ S $, that is, there are at most $ r $ vertices in $ S $ at a distance at most $ r $ from $ v $ in $ G $. The multipacking number of $ G $ is the maximum cardinality of a multipacking of $ G $ and is denoted by $ mp(G) $. We show that, for any connected chordal graph $G$, $γ_{b}(G)\leq \big\lceil{\frac{3}{2} mp(G)\big\rceil}$. We also show that $γ_b(G)-mp(G)$ can be arbitrarily large for connected chordal graphs by constructing an infinite family of connected chordal graphs such that the ratio $γ_b(G)/mp(G)=10/9$, with $mp(G)$ arbitrarily large. Moreover, we show that $γ_{b}(G)\leq \big\lfloor{\frac{3}{2} mp(G)+2δ\big\rfloor} $ holds for all $δ$-hyperbolic graphs. In addition, we provide a polynomial-time algorithm to construct a multipacking of a $δ$-hyperbolic graph $G$ of size at least $ \big\lceil{\frac{2mp(G)-4δ}{3} \big\rceil} $.

Graph burning is a graph process that models the spread of social contagion. Initially, all the vertices of a graph $G$ are unburnt. At each step, an unburnt vertex is put on fire and the fire from burnt vertices of the previous step spreads to their adjacent unburnt vertices. This process continues till all the vertices are burnt. The burning number $b(G)$ of the graph $G$ is the minimum number of steps required to burn all the vertices in the graph. The burning number conjecture by Bonato et al. states that for a connected graph $G$ of order $n$, its burning number $b(G) \leq \lceil \sqrt{n} \rceil$. It is easy to observe that in order to burn a graph it is enough to burn its spanning tree. Hence it suffices to prove that for any tree $T$ of order $n$, its burning number $b(T) \leq \lceil \sqrt{n} \rceil$ where $T$ is the spanning tree of $G$. It was proved in 2018 that $b(T) \leq \lceil \sqrt{n + n_2 + 1/4} +1/2 \rceil$ for a tree $T$ where $n_2$ is the number of degree $2$ vertices in $T$. In this paper, we provide an algorithm to burn a tree and we improve the existing bound using this algorithm. We prove that $b(T)\leq \lceil \sqrt{n + n_2 + 8}\rceil -1$ which is an improved bound for $n\geq 50$. We also provide an algorithm to burn some subclasses of the binary tree and prove the burning number conjecture for the same.