arXiv++ Combinatorics

Permutation pattern-avoidance is a central concept of both enumerative and extremal combinatorics. In this paper we study the effect of permutation pattern-avoidance on the complexity of optimization problems. In the context of the dynamic optimality conjecture (Sleator, Tarjan, STOC 1983), Chalermsook, Goswami, Kozma, Mehlhorn, and Saranurak (FOCS 2015) conjectured that the amortized search cost of an optimal binary search tree (BST) is constant whenever the search sequence is pattern-avoiding. The best known bound to date is $2^{α{(n)}(1+o(1))}$ recently obtained by Chalermsook, Pettie, and Yingchareonthawornchai (SODA 2024); here $n$ is the BST size and $α(\cdot)$ the inverse-Ackermann function. In this paper we resolve the conjecture, showing a tight $O(1)$ bound. This indicates a barrier to dynamic optimality: any candidate online BST (e.g., splay trees or greedy trees) must match this optimum, but current analysis techniques only give superconstant bounds. More broadly, we argue that the easiness of pattern-avoiding input is a general phenomenon, not limited to BSTs or even to data structures. To illustrate this, we show that when the input avoids an arbitrary, fixed, a priori unknown pattern, one can efficiently compute a $k$-server solution of $n$ requests from a unit interval, with total cost $n^{O(1/\log k)}$, in contrast to the worst-case $Θ(n/k)$ bound; and a traveling salesman tour of $n$ points from a unit box, of length $O(\log{n})$, in contrast to the worst-case $Θ(\sqrt{n})$ bound; similar results hold for the euclidean minimum spanning tree, Steiner tree, and nearest-neighbor graphs. We show both results to be tight. Our techniques build on the Marcus-Tardos proof of the Stanley-Wilf conjecture, and on the recently emerging concept of twin-width.

Search trees on trees (STTs) generalize the fundamental binary search tree (BST) data structure: in STTs the underlying search space is an arbitrary tree, whereas in BSTs it is a path. An optimal BST of size $n$ can be computed for a given distribution of queries in $O(n^2)$ time [Knuth 1971] and centroid BSTs provide a nearly-optimal alternative, computable in $O(n)$ time [Mehlhorn 1977]. By contrast, optimal STTs are not known to be computable in polynomial time, and the fastest constant-approximation algorithm runs in $O(n^3)$ time [Berendsohn, Kozma 2022]. Centroid trees can be defined for STTs analogously to BSTs, and they have been used in a wide range of algorithmic applications. In the unweighted case (i.e., for a uniform distribution of queries), a centroid tree can be computed in $O(n)$ time [Brodal et al. 2001; Della Giustina et al. 2019]. These algorithms, however, do not readily extend to the weighted case. Moreover, no approximation guarantees were previously known for centroid trees in either the unweighted or weighted cases. In this paper we revisit centroid trees in a general, weighted setting, and we settle both the algorithmic complexity of constructing them, and the quality of their approximation. For constructing a weighted centroid tree, we give an output-sensitive $O(n\log h)\subseteq O(n\log n)$ time algorithm, where $h$ is the height of the resulting centroid tree. If the weights are of polynomial complexity, the running time is $O(n\log\log n)$. We show these bounds to be optimal, in a general decision tree model of computation. For approximation, we prove that the cost of a centroid tree is at most twice the optimum, and this guarantee is best possible, both in the weighted and unweighted cases. We also give tight, fine-grained bounds on the approximation-ratio for bounded-degree trees and on the approximation-ratio of more general $α$-centroid trees.

We study edge-labelings of the complete bidirected graph $\overset{\tiny\leftrightarrow}{K}_n$ with functions from the set $[d] = \{1, \dots, d\}$ to itself. We call a cycle in $\overset{\tiny\leftrightarrow}{K}_n$ a fixed-point cycle if composing the labels of its edges results in a map that has a fixed point, and we say that a labeling is fixed-point-free if no fixed-point cycle exists. For a given $d$, we ask for the largest value of $n$, denoted $R_f(d)$, for which there exists a fixed-point-free labeling of $\overset{\tiny\leftrightarrow}{K}_n$. Determining $R_f(d)$ for all $d >0$ is a natural Ramsey-type question, generalizing some well-studied zero-sum problems in extremal combinatorics. The problem was recently introduced by Chaudhury, Garg, Mehlhorn, Mehta, and Misra, who proved that $d \leq R_f(d) \leq d^4+d$ and showed that the problem has close connections to EFX allocations, a central problem of fair allocation in social choice theory. In this paper we show the improved bound $R_f(d) \leq d^{2 + o(1)}$, yielding an efficient ${(1-\varepsilon)}$-EFX allocation with $n$ agents and $O(n^{0.67})$ unallocated goods for any constant $\varepsilon \in (0,1/2]$; this improves the bound of $O(n^{0.8})$ of Chaudhury, Garg, Mehlhorn, Mehta, and Misra. Additionally, we prove the stronger upper bound $2d-2$, in the case where all edge-labels are permulations. A very special case of this problem, that of finding zero-sum cycles in digraphs whose edges are labeled with elements of $\mathbb{Z}_d$, was recently considered by Alon and Krivelevich and by Mészáros and Steiner. Our result improves the bounds obtained by these authors and extends them to labelings from an arbitrary (not necessarily commutative) group, while also simplifying the proof.

The caterpillar associahedron $\mathcal{A}(G)$ is a polytope arising from the rotation graph of search trees on a caterpillar tree $G$, generalizing the rotation graph of binary search trees (BSTs) and thus the conventional associahedron. We show that the diameter of $\mathcal{A}(G)$ is $Θ(n + m \cdot (H+1))$, where $n$ is the number of vertices, $m$ is the number of leaves, and $H$ is the entropy of the leaf distribution of $G$. Our proofs reveal a strong connection between caterpillar associahedra and searching in BSTs. We prove the lower bound using Wilber's first lower bound for dynamic BSTs, and the upper bound by reducing the problem to searching in static BSTs.

A 0-1 matrix $M$ contains a 0-1 matrix pattern $P$ if we can obtain $P$ from $M$ by deleting rows and/or columns and turning arbitrary 1-entries into 0s. The saturation function $\mathrm{sat}(P,n)$ for a 0-1 matrix pattern $P$ indicates the minimum number of 1s in an $n \times n$ 0-1 matrix that does not contain $P$, but changing any 0-entry into a 1-entry creates an occurrence of $P$. Fulek and Keszegh recently showed that each pattern has a saturation function either in $O(1)$ or in $Θ(n)$. We fully classify the saturation functions of permutation matrices.

A 0-1 matrix $M$ contains a 0-1 matrix pattern $P$ if we can obtain $P$ from $M$ by deleting rows and/or columns and turning arbitrary 1-entries into 0s. The saturation function $\mathrm{sat}(P,n)$ for a 0-1 matrix pattern $P$ indicates the minimum number of 1s in a $n \times n$ 0-1 matrix that does not contain $P$, but changing any 0-entry into a 1-entry creates an occurrence of $P$. Fulek and Keszegh recently showed that the saturation function is either bounded or in $Θ(n)$. Building on their results, we find a large class of patterns with bounded saturation function, including both infinitely many permutation matrices and infinitely many non-permutation matrices.

Search trees on trees (STTs) are a far-reaching generalization of binary search trees (BSTs), allowing the efficient exploration of tree-structured domains. (BSTs are the special case in which the underlying domain is a path.) Trees on trees have been extensively studied under various guises in computer science and discrete mathematics. Recently Bose, Cardinal, Iacono, Koumoutsos, and Langerman (SODA 2020) considered adaptive STTs and observed that, apart from notable exceptions, the machinery developed for BSTs in the past decades does not readily transfer to STTs. In particular, they asked whether the optimal STT can be efficiently computed or approximated (by analogy to Knuth's algorithm for optimal BSTs), and whether natural self-adjusting BSTs such as Splay trees (Sleator, Tarjan, 1983) can be extended to this more general setting. We answer both questions affirmatively. First, we show that a $(1 + \frac{1}{t})$-approximation of an optimal size-$n$ STT for a given search distribution can be computed in time $O(n^{2t + 1})$ for all integers $t \geq 1$. Second, we identify a broad family of STTs with linear rotation-distance, allowing the generalization of Splay trees to the STT setting. We show that our generalized Splay satisfies a static optimality theorem, asymptotically matching the cost of the optimal STT in an online fashion, i.e. without knowledge of the search distribution. Our results suggest an extension of the dynamic optimality conjecture for Splay trees to the broader setting of trees on trees.

Group testing is concerned with identifying $t$ defective items in a set of $m$ items, where each test reports whether a specific subset of items contains at least one defective. In non-adaptive group testing, the subsets to be tested are fixed in advance. By testing multiple items at once, the required number of tests can be made much smaller than $m$. In fact, for $t \in \mathcal{O}(1)$, the optimal number of (non-adaptive) tests is known to be $Θ(\log{m})$. In this paper, we consider the problem of non-adaptive group testing in a geometric setting, where the items are points in $d$-dimensional Euclidean space and the tests are axis-parallel boxes (hyperrectangles). We present upper and lower bounds on the required number of tests under this geometric constraint. In contrast to the general, combinatorial case, the bounds in our geometric setting are polynomial in $m$. For instance, our results imply that identifying a defective pair in a set of $m$ points in the plane always requires $Ω(m^{3/5})$ tests, and there exist configurations of $m$ points for which $\mathcal{O}(m^{2/3})$ tests are sufficient, whereas to identify a single defective point in the plane, $Θ(m^{1/2})$ tests are always necessary and sometimes sufficient.

Permutation patterns and pattern avoidance have been intensively studied in combinatorics and computer science, going back at least to the seminal work of Knuth on stack-sorting (1968). Perhaps the most natural algorithmic question in this area is deciding whether a given permutation of length $n$ contains a given pattern of length $k$. In this work we give two new algorithms for this well-studied problem, one whose running time is $n^{k/4 + o(k)}$, and a polynomial-space algorithm whose running time is the better of $O(1.6181^n)$ and $O(n^{k/2 + 1})$. These results improve the earlier best bounds of $n^{0.47k + o(k)}$ and $O(1.79^n)$ due to Ahal and Rabinovich (2000) resp. Bruner and Lackner (2012) and are the fastest algorithms for the problem when $k \in Ω(\log{n})$. We show that both our new algorithms and the previous exponential-time algorithms in the literature can be viewed through the unifying lens of constraint-satisfaction. Our algorithms can also count, within the same running time, the number of occurrences of a pattern. We show that this result is close to optimal: solving the counting problem in time $f(k) \cdot n^{o(k/\log{k})}$ would contradict the exponential-time hypothesis (ETH). For some special classes of patterns we obtain improved running times. We further prove that $3$-increasing and $3$-decreasing permutations can, in some sense, embed arbitrary permutations of almost linear length, which indicates that an algorithm with sub-exponential running time is unlikely, even for patterns from these restricted classes.