arXiv++ Combinatorics

We nearly settle a natural extremal question about set systems over $[n]$: the tradeoff between the {size} (number of sets) and the number of {full chains}. This question was initially raised by Johnson, Leader, and Russell [Combin.~Probab.~Comp., 2015] as a counterpart to Sperner-type results in combinatorics. Recently, a framework introduced by Ameli, Nederlof, and Wang, and independently by Dallant and Kozma [FOCS 2026] linked this question to the space- and time-complexity of Bellman-Held-Karp-style dynamic programming algorithms for permutation problems such as the traveling salesman (TSP). Precisely, they showed that a space-time product $γ^{n+o(n)}$ is feasible for the TSP, whenever a set system of (normalized) size $S$ and chain density $D$ exists, with $ γ= S^2/D$. In this paper we show an essentially {optimal} bound of $γ\approx 3.1819$ for this quantity, closing the gap between the previous best lower and upper bounds of $γ\geq 3.015$ and $ γ\leq 3.572$ respectively. This implies a TSP algorithm with space-time product $O(3.1819^n)$ for input size $n$, as well as a limit to further improvements in this broad framework. More generally, we can obtain close to optimal values $D$ for any feasible value $S$, effectively settling the question of the number of full chains at every size. The crucial step towards our results is casting the extremal combinatorics question as an {information~vs.~entropy} tradeoff involving two random variables. This reformulation {exactly} captures the optimal tradeoff for the combinatorial problem, leading to a framework in which primal-dual certificates can be derived, proving rigorous upper and lower bounds on $γ$. We also give a further application of our techniques, improving a bound of Duffus, Sands, and Winkler on the minimum size of fibres in the Boolean lattice.

The traveling salesman problem (TSP) is a cornerstone of combinatorial optimization and has deeply influenced the development of algorithmic techniques in both exact and approximate settings. Yet, improving on the decades-old bounds for solving TSP exactly remains elusive: the dynamic program of Bellman, Held, and Karp from 1962 uses $2^{n+O(\log{n})}$ time and space, and the divide-and-conquer approach of Gurevich and Shelah from 1987 uses $4^{n + O(\log^2{n})}$ time and polynomial space. A straightforward combination of the two algorithms trades off $T^{n+o(n)}$ time and $S^{n+o(n)}$ space at various points of the curve $ST = 4$. An improvement to this tradeoff when $2 < T < 2\sqrt{2}$ was found by Koivisto and Parviainen (SODA 2010), yielding a minimum of $ST \approx 3.93$. Koivisto and Parviainen show their method to be optimal among a broad class of partial-order-based approaches, and to date, no improvement or alternative method has been found. In this paper we give a tradeoff that strictly improves all previous ones for all $2 < T < 4$, achieving a minimum of $ST < 3.572$. A key ingredient is the construction of sparse set systems (hypergraphs) that admit a large number of maximal chains. The existence of such objects is of independent interest in extremal combinatorics, likely to see further applications. Along the way we disprove a combinatorial conjecture of Johnson, Leader, and Russell from 2013, relating it with the optimality of the previous tradeoff schemes for TSP. Our techniques extend to a broad class of permutation problems over arbitrary semirings, yielding improved space-time tradeoffs in these settings as well.

The Bellman-Ford algorithm for single-source shortest paths repeatedly updates tentative distances in an operation called relaxing an edge. In several important applications a non-adaptive (oblivious) implementation is preferred, which means fixing the entire sequence of relaxations upfront, independently of the edge-weights. Such an implementation performs, in a dense graph on $n$ vertices, $(1 + o(1))n^3$ relaxations. An improvement by Yen from 1970 reduces the number of relaxations by a factor of two. We show that no further constant-factor improvements are possible, and every non-adaptive deterministic algorithm based on relaxations must perform $(\frac{1}{2} - o(1))n^3$ steps. This improves an earlier lower bound of Eppstein of $(\frac{1}{6} - o(1))n^3$. Given that a non-adaptive randomized variant of Bellman-Ford with at most $(\frac{1}{3} + o(1))n^3$ relaxations (with high probability) is known, our result implies a strict separation between deterministic and randomized strategies, answering an open question of Eppstein. On the complexity side, we show that deciding whether a given relaxation sequence is guaranteed to yield correct distances is NP-hard, even with the complete graph as input.

A \emph{saddlepoint} of an $n \times n$ matrix is an entry that is the maximum of its row and the minimum of its column. Saddlepoints give the \emph{value} of a two-player zero-sum game, corresponding to its pure-strategy Nash equilibria; efficiently finding a saddlepoint is thus a natural and fundamental algorithmic task. For finding a \emph{strict saddlepoint} (an entry that is the strict maximum of its row and the strict minimum of its column) we recently gave an $O({n\log^*{n}})$-time algorithm, improving the $O({n\log{n}})$ bounds from 1991 of Bienstock, Chung, Fredman, Schäffer, Shor, Suri and of Byrne and Vaserstein. In this paper we present an optimal $O({n})$-time algorithm for finding a strict saddlepoint based on random sampling. Our algorithm, like earlier approaches, accesses matrix entries only via unit-cost binary comparisons. For finding a (non-strict) saddlepoint, we extend an existing lower bound to randomized algorithms, showing that the trivial $O(n^2)$ runtime cannot be improved even with the use of randomness.

A saddlepoint of an $n \times n$ matrix $A$ is an entry of $A$ that is a maximum in its row and a minimum in its column. Knuth (1968) gave several different algorithms for finding a saddlepoint. The worst-case running time of these algorithms is $Θ(n^2)$, and Llewellyn, Tovey, and Trick (1988) showed that this cannot be improved, as in the worst case all entries of A may need to be queried. A strict saddlepoint of $A$ is an entry that is the strict maximum in its row and the strict minimum in its column. The strict saddlepoint (if it exists) is unique, and Bienstock, Chung, Fredman, Schäffer, Shor, and Suri (1991) showed that it can be found in time $O(n \log{n})$, where a dominant runtime contribution is sorting the diagonal of the matrix. This upper bound has not been improved since 1991. In this paper we show that the strict saddlepoint can be found in $O(n \log^{*}{n})$ time, where $\log^{*}$ denotes the very slowly growing iterated logarithm function, coming close to the lower bound of $Ω(n)$. In fact, we can also compute, within the same runtime, the value of a non-strict saddlepoint, assuming one exists. Our algorithm is based on a simple recursive approach, a feasibility test inspired by searching in sorted matrices, and a relaxed notion of saddlepoint.

Permutation pattern-avoidance is a central concept of both enumerative and extremal combinatorics. In this paper we study the effect of permutation pattern-avoidance on the complexity of optimization problems. In the context of the dynamic optimality conjecture (Sleator, Tarjan, STOC 1983), Chalermsook, Goswami, Kozma, Mehlhorn, and Saranurak (FOCS 2015) conjectured that the amortized search cost of an optimal binary search tree (BST) is constant whenever the search sequence is pattern-avoiding. The best known bound to date is $2^{α{(n)}(1+o(1))}$ recently obtained by Chalermsook, Pettie, and Yingchareonthawornchai (SODA 2024); here $n$ is the BST size and $α(\cdot)$ the inverse-Ackermann function. In this paper we resolve the conjecture, showing a tight $O(1)$ bound. This indicates a barrier to dynamic optimality: any candidate online BST (e.g., splay trees or greedy trees) must match this optimum, but current analysis techniques only give superconstant bounds. More broadly, we argue that the easiness of pattern-avoiding input is a general phenomenon, not limited to BSTs or even to data structures. To illustrate this, we show that when the input avoids an arbitrary, fixed, a priori unknown pattern, one can efficiently compute a $k$-server solution of $n$ requests from a unit interval, with total cost $n^{O(1/\log k)}$, in contrast to the worst-case $Θ(n/k)$ bound; and a traveling salesman tour of $n$ points from a unit box, of length $O(\log{n})$, in contrast to the worst-case $Θ(\sqrt{n})$ bound; similar results hold for the euclidean minimum spanning tree, Steiner tree, and nearest-neighbor graphs. We show both results to be tight. Our techniques build on the Marcus-Tardos proof of the Stanley-Wilf conjecture, and on the recently emerging concept of twin-width.

Search trees on trees (STTs) generalize the fundamental binary search tree (BST) data structure: in STTs the underlying search space is an arbitrary tree, whereas in BSTs it is a path. An optimal BST of size $n$ can be computed for a given distribution of queries in $O(n^2)$ time [Knuth 1971] and centroid BSTs provide a nearly-optimal alternative, computable in $O(n)$ time [Mehlhorn 1977]. By contrast, optimal STTs are not known to be computable in polynomial time, and the fastest constant-approximation algorithm runs in $O(n^3)$ time [Berendsohn, Kozma 2022]. Centroid trees can be defined for STTs analogously to BSTs, and they have been used in a wide range of algorithmic applications. In the unweighted case (i.e., for a uniform distribution of queries), a centroid tree can be computed in $O(n)$ time [Brodal et al. 2001; Della Giustina et al. 2019]. These algorithms, however, do not readily extend to the weighted case. Moreover, no approximation guarantees were previously known for centroid trees in either the unweighted or weighted cases. In this paper we revisit centroid trees in a general, weighted setting, and we settle both the algorithmic complexity of constructing them, and the quality of their approximation. For constructing a weighted centroid tree, we give an output-sensitive $O(n\log h)\subseteq O(n\log n)$ time algorithm, where $h$ is the height of the resulting centroid tree. If the weights are of polynomial complexity, the running time is $O(n\log\log n)$. We show these bounds to be optimal, in a general decision tree model of computation. For approximation, we prove that the cost of a centroid tree is at most twice the optimum, and this guarantee is best possible, both in the weighted and unweighted cases. We also give tight, fine-grained bounds on the approximation-ratio for bounded-degree trees and on the approximation-ratio of more general $α$-centroid trees.

We study edge-labelings of the complete bidirected graph $\overset{\tiny\leftrightarrow}{K}_n$ with functions from the set $[d] = \{1, \dots, d\}$ to itself. We call a cycle in $\overset{\tiny\leftrightarrow}{K}_n$ a fixed-point cycle if composing the labels of its edges results in a map that has a fixed point, and we say that a labeling is fixed-point-free if no fixed-point cycle exists. For a given $d$, we ask for the largest value of $n$, denoted $R_f(d)$, for which there exists a fixed-point-free labeling of $\overset{\tiny\leftrightarrow}{K}_n$. Determining $R_f(d)$ for all $d >0$ is a natural Ramsey-type question, generalizing some well-studied zero-sum problems in extremal combinatorics. The problem was recently introduced by Chaudhury, Garg, Mehlhorn, Mehta, and Misra, who proved that $d \leq R_f(d) \leq d^4+d$ and showed that the problem has close connections to EFX allocations, a central problem of fair allocation in social choice theory. In this paper we show the improved bound $R_f(d) \leq d^{2 + o(1)}$, yielding an efficient ${(1-\varepsilon)}$-EFX allocation with $n$ agents and $O(n^{0.67})$ unallocated goods for any constant $\varepsilon \in (0,1/2]$; this improves the bound of $O(n^{0.8})$ of Chaudhury, Garg, Mehlhorn, Mehta, and Misra. Additionally, we prove the stronger upper bound $2d-2$, in the case where all edge-labels are permulations. A very special case of this problem, that of finding zero-sum cycles in digraphs whose edges are labeled with elements of $\mathbb{Z}_d$, was recently considered by Alon and Krivelevich and by Mészáros and Steiner. Our result improves the bounds obtained by these authors and extends them to labelings from an arbitrary (not necessarily commutative) group, while also simplifying the proof.

Search trees on trees (STTs) are a far-reaching generalization of binary search trees (BSTs), allowing the efficient exploration of tree-structured domains. (BSTs are the special case in which the underlying domain is a path.) Trees on trees have been extensively studied under various guises in computer science and discrete mathematics. Recently Bose, Cardinal, Iacono, Koumoutsos, and Langerman (SODA 2020) considered adaptive STTs and observed that, apart from notable exceptions, the machinery developed for BSTs in the past decades does not readily transfer to STTs. In particular, they asked whether the optimal STT can be efficiently computed or approximated (by analogy to Knuth's algorithm for optimal BSTs), and whether natural self-adjusting BSTs such as Splay trees (Sleator, Tarjan, 1983) can be extended to this more general setting. We answer both questions affirmatively. First, we show that a $(1 + \frac{1}{t})$-approximation of an optimal size-$n$ STT for a given search distribution can be computed in time $O(n^{2t + 1})$ for all integers $t \geq 1$. Second, we identify a broad family of STTs with linear rotation-distance, allowing the generalization of Splay trees to the STT setting. We show that our generalized Splay satisfies a static optimality theorem, asymptotically matching the cost of the optimal STT in an online fashion, i.e. without knowledge of the search distribution. Our results suggest an extension of the dynamic optimality conjecture for Splay trees to the broader setting of trees on trees.

Group testing is concerned with identifying $t$ defective items in a set of $m$ items, where each test reports whether a specific subset of items contains at least one defective. In non-adaptive group testing, the subsets to be tested are fixed in advance. By testing multiple items at once, the required number of tests can be made much smaller than $m$. In fact, for $t \in \mathcal{O}(1)$, the optimal number of (non-adaptive) tests is known to be $Θ(\log{m})$. In this paper, we consider the problem of non-adaptive group testing in a geometric setting, where the items are points in $d$-dimensional Euclidean space and the tests are axis-parallel boxes (hyperrectangles). We present upper and lower bounds on the required number of tests under this geometric constraint. In contrast to the general, combinatorial case, the bounds in our geometric setting are polynomial in $m$. For instance, our results imply that identifying a defective pair in a set of $m$ points in the plane always requires $Ω(m^{3/5})$ tests, and there exist configurations of $m$ points for which $\mathcal{O}(m^{2/3})$ tests are sufficient, whereas to identify a single defective point in the plane, $Θ(m^{1/2})$ tests are always necessary and sometimes sufficient.

Partially ordered sets (posets) are fundamental combinatorial objects with important applications in computer science. Perhaps the most natural algorithmic task, given a size-$n$ poset, is to compute its number of linear extensions. In 1991 Brightwell and Winkler showed this problem to be $\#P$-hard. In spite of extensive research, the fastest known algorithm is still the straightforward $O(n 2^n)$-time dynamic programming (an adaptation of the Bellman-Held-Karp algorithm for the TSP). Very recently, Dittmer and Pak showed that the problem remains $\#P$-hard for two-dimensional posets, and no algorithm was known to break the $2^n$-barrier even in this special case. The question of whether the two-dimensional problem is easier than the general case was raised decades ago by Möhring, Felsner and Wernisch, and others. In this paper we show that the number of linear extensions of a two-dimensional poset can be computed in time $O(1.8172^n)$. The related jump number problem asks for a linear extension of a poset, minimizing the number of neighboring incomparable pairs. The problem has applications in scheduling, and has been widely studied. In 1981 Pulleyblank showed it to be NP-complete. We show that the jump number problem can be solved (in arbitrary posets) in time $O(1.824^n)$. This improves (slightly) the previous best bound of Kratsch and Kratsch.

Permutation patterns and pattern avoidance have been intensively studied in combinatorics and computer science, going back at least to the seminal work of Knuth on stack-sorting (1968). Perhaps the most natural algorithmic question in this area is deciding whether a given permutation of length $n$ contains a given pattern of length $k$. In this work we give two new algorithms for this well-studied problem, one whose running time is $n^{k/4 + o(k)}$, and a polynomial-space algorithm whose running time is the better of $O(1.6181^n)$ and $O(n^{k/2 + 1})$. These results improve the earlier best bounds of $n^{0.47k + o(k)}$ and $O(1.79^n)$ due to Ahal and Rabinovich (2000) resp. Bruner and Lackner (2012) and are the fastest algorithms for the problem when $k \in Ω(\log{n})$. We show that both our new algorithms and the previous exponential-time algorithms in the literature can be viewed through the unifying lens of constraint-satisfaction. Our algorithms can also count, within the same running time, the number of occurrences of a pattern. We show that this result is close to optimal: solving the counting problem in time $f(k) \cdot n^{o(k/\log{k})}$ would contradict the exponential-time hypothesis (ETH). For some special classes of patterns we obtain improved running times. We further prove that $3$-increasing and $3$-decreasing permutations can, in some sense, embed arbitrary permutations of almost linear length, which indicates that an algorithm with sub-exponential running time is unlikely, even for patterns from these restricted classes.

Permutation patterns and pattern avoidance have been intensively studied in combinatorics and computer science, going back at least to the seminal work of Knuth on stack-sorting (1968). Perhaps the most natural algorithmic question in this area is deciding whether a given permutation of length $n$ contains a given pattern of length $k$. In this work we give two new algorithms for this well-studied problem, one whose running time is $n^{0.44k+o(k)}$, and one whose running time is the better of $O(1.6181^n)$ and $n^{k/2+o(k)}$. These results improve the earlier best bounds of Ahal and Rabinovich (2000), and Bruner and Lackner (2012), and are the fastest algorithms for the problem when $k = Ω(\log n)$. When $k = o(\log n)$, the parameterized algorithm of Guillemot and Marx (2013) dominates. Our second algorithm uses polynomial space and is significantly simpler than all previous approaches with comparable running times, including an $n^{k/2+o(k)}$ algorithm proposed by Guillemot and Marx. Our approach can be summarized as follows: "for every matching of the even-valued entries of the pattern, try to match all odd-valued entries left-to-right". For the special case of patterns that are Jordan-permutations, we show an improved, subexponential running time.

Dirac's theorem (1952) is a classical result of graph theory, stating that an $n$-vertex graph ($n \geq 3$) is Hamiltonian if every vertex has degree at least $n/2$. Both the value $n/2$ and the requirement for every vertex to have high degree are necessary for the theorem to hold. In this work we give efficient algorithms for determining Hamiltonicity when either of the two conditions are relaxed. More precisely, we show that the Hamiltonian cycle problem can be solved in time $c^k \cdot n^{O(1)}$, for some fixed constant $c$, if at least $n-k$ vertices have degree at least $n/2$, or if all vertices have degree at least $n/2-k$. The running time is, in both cases, asymptotically optimal, under the exponential-time hypothesis (ETH). The results extend the range of tractability of the Hamiltonian cycle problem, showing that it is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized below a natural bound. In addition, for the first parameterization we show that a kernel with $O(k)$ vertices can be found in polynomial time.

We revisit multipass pairing heaps and path-balanced binary search trees (BSTs), two classical algorithms for data structure maintenance. The pairing heap is a simple and efficient "self-adjusting" heap, introduced in 1986 by Fredman, Sedgewick, Sleator, and Tarjan. In the multipass variant (one of the original pairing heap variants described by Fredman et al.) the minimum item is extracted via repeated pairing rounds in which neighboring siblings are linked. Path-balanced BSTs, proposed by Sleator (Subramanian, 1996), are a natural alternative to Splay trees (Sleator and Tarjan, 1983). In a path-balanced BST, whenever an item is accessed, the search path leading to that item is re-arranged into a balanced tree. Despite their simplicity, both algorithms turned out to be difficult to analyse. Fredman et al. showed that operations in multipass pairing heaps take amortized $O(\log{n} \cdot \log\log{n} / \log\log\log{n})$ time. For searching in path-balanced BSTs, Balasubramanian and Raman showed in 1995 the same amortized time bound of $O(\log{n} \cdot \log\log{n} / \log\log\log{n})$, using a different argument. In this paper we show an explicit connection between the two algorithms and improve the two bounds to $O\left(\log{n} \cdot 2^{\log^{\ast}{n}} \cdot \log^{\ast}{n}\right)$, respectively $O\left(\log{n} \cdot 2^{\log^{\ast}{n}} \cdot (\log^{\ast}{n})^2 \right)$, where $\log^{\ast}(\cdot)$ denotes the very slowly growing iterated logarithm function. These are the first improvements in more than three, resp. two decades, approaching in both cases the information-theoretic lower bound of $Ω(\log{n})$.

We present a new connection between self-adjusting binary search trees (BSTs) and heaps, two fundamental, extensively studied, and practically relevant families of data structures. Roughly speaking, we map an arbitrary heap algorithm within a natural model, to a corresponding BST algorithm with the same cost on a dual sequence of operations (i.e. the same sequence with the roles of time and key-space switched). This is the first general transformation between the two families of data structures. There is a rich theory of dynamic optimality for BSTs (i.e. the theory of competitiveness between BST algorithms). The lack of an analogous theory for heaps has been noted in the literature. Through our connection, we transfer all instance-specific lower bounds known for BSTs to a general model of heaps, initiating a theory of dynamic optimality for heaps. On the algorithmic side, we obtain a new, simple and efficient heap algorithm, which we call the smooth heap. We show the smooth heap to be the heap-counterpart of Greedy, the BST algorithm with the strongest proven and conjectured properties from the literature, widely believed to be instance-optimal. Assuming the optimality of Greedy, the smooth heap is also optimal within our model of heap algorithms. As corollaries of results known for Greedy, we obtain instance-specific upper bounds for the smooth heap, with applications in adaptive sorting. Intriguingly, the smooth heap, although derived from a non-practical BST algorithm, is simple and easy to implement (e.g. it stores no auxiliary data besides the keys and tree pointers). It can be seen as a variation on the popular pairing heap data structure, extending it with a "power-of-two-choices" type of heuristic.

We revisit the classical problem of searching in a binary search tree (BST) using rotations, and present novel connections of this problem to a number of geometric and combinatorial structures. In particular, we show that the execution trace of a BST that serves a sequence of queries is in close correspondence with the flip-sequence between two rectangulations. (Rectangulations are well-studied combinatorial objects also known as mosaic floorplans.) We also reinterpret Small Manhattan Network, a problem with known connections to the BST problem, in terms of flips in rectangulations. We apply further transformations to the obtained geometric model, to arrive at a particularly simple view of the BST problem that resembles sequences of edge-relaxations in a shortest path algorithm. Our connections yield new results and observations for all structures concerned. In this draft we present some preliminary findings. BSTs with rotations are among the most fundamental and most thoroughly studied objects in computer science, nonetheless they pose long-standing open questions, such as the dynamic optimality conjecture of Sleator and Tarjan (STOC 1983). Our hope is that the correspondences presented in this paper provide a new perspective on this old problem and bring new tools to the study of dynamic optimality.

We study the complexity of the Hitting Set problem in set systems (hypergraphs) that avoid certain sub-structures. In particular, we characterize the classical and parameterized complexity of the problem when the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension (VC-dimension) of the input is small. VC-dimension is a natural measure of complexity of set systems. Several tractable instances of Hitting Set with a geometric or graph-theoretical flavor are known to have low VC-dimension. In set systems of bounded VC-dimension, Hitting Set is known to admit efficient and almost optimal approximation algorithms (Brönnimann and Goodrich, 1995; Even, Rawitz, and Shahar, 2005; Agarwal and Pan, 2014). In contrast to these approximation-results, a low VC-dimension does not necessarily imply tractability in the parameterized sense. In fact, we show that Hitting Set is W[1]-hard already on inputs with VC-dimension 2, even if the VC-dimension of the dual set system is also 2. Thus, Hitting Set is very unlikely to be fixed-parameter tractable even in this arguably simple case. This answers an open question raised by King in 2010. For set systems whose (primal or dual) VC-dimension is 1, we show that Hitting Set is solvable in polynomial time. To bridge the gap in complexity between the classes of inputs with VC-dimension 1 and 2, we use a measure that is more fine-grained than VC-dimension. In terms of this measure, we identify a sharp threshold where the complexity of Hitting Set transitions from polynomial-time-solvable to NP-hard. The tractable class that lies just under the threshold is a generalization of Edge Cover, and thus extends the domain of polynomial-time tractability of Hitting Set.

The dynamic optimality conjecture is perhaps the most fundamental open question about binary search trees (BST). It postulates the existence of an asymptotically optimal online BST, i.e. one that is constant factor competitive with any BST on any input access sequence. The two main candidates for dynamic optimality in the literature are splay trees [Sleator and Tarjan, 1985], and Greedy [Lucas, 1988; Munro, 2000; Demaine et al. 2009] [..] Dynamic optimality is trivial for almost all sequences: the optimum access cost of most length-n sequences is Theta(n log n), achievable by any balanced BST. Thus, the obvious missing step towards the conjecture is an understanding of the "easy" access sequences. [..] The difficulty of proving dynamic optimality is witnessed by highly restricted special cases that remain unresolved; one prominent example is the traversal conjecture [Sleator and Tarjan, 1985], which states that preorder sequences (whose optimum is linear) are linear-time accessed by splay trees; no online BST is known to satisfy this conjecture. In this paper, we prove two different relaxations of the traversal conjecture for Greedy: (i) Greedy is almost linear for preorder traversal, (ii) if a linear-time preprocessing is allowed, Greedy is in fact linear. These statements are corollaries of our more general results that express the complexity of access sequences in terms of a pattern avoidance parameter k. [..] To our knowledge, these are the first upper bounds for Greedy that are not known to hold for any other online BST. To obtain these results we identify an input-revealing property of Greedy. Informally, this means that the execution log partially reveals the structure of the access sequence. This property facilitates the use of rich technical tools from forbidden submatrix theory. [Abridged]

In this paper we extend the geometric binary search tree (BST) model of Demaine, Harmon, Iacono, Kane, and Patrascu (DHIKP) to accommodate for insertions and deletions. Within this extended model, we study the online Greedy BST algorithm introduced by DHIKP. Greedy BST is known to be equivalent to a maximally greedy (but inherently offline) algorithm introduced independently by Lucas in 1988 and Munro in 2000, conjectured to be dynamically optimal. With the application of forbidden-submatrix theory, we prove a quasilinear upper bound on the performance of Greedy BST on deque sequences. It has been conjectured (Tarjan, 1985) that splay trees (Sleator and Tarjan, 1983) can serve such sequences in linear time. Currently neither splay trees, nor other general-purpose BST algorithms are known to fulfill this requirement. As a special case, we show that Greedy BST can serve output-restricted deque sequences in linear time. A similar result is known for splay trees (Tarjan, 1985; Elmasry, 2004). As a further application of the insert-delete model, we give a simple proof that, given a set U of permutations of [n], the access cost of any BST algorithm is Omega(log |U| + n) on "most" of the permutations from U. In particular, this implies that the access cost for a random permutation of [n] is Omega(n log n) with high probability. Besides the splay tree noted before, Greedy BST has recently emerged as a plausible candidate for dynamic optimality. Compared to splay trees, much less effort has gone into analyzing Greedy BST. Our work is intended as a step towards a full understanding of Greedy BST, and we remark that forbidden-submatrix arguments seem particularly well suited for carrying out this program.