arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study $p$-spread probability measures on the Boolean lattice. We show that if a set family is large under the product Bernoulli-$p$ measure, then no $p$-spread measure can be supported on the family of sets not covered by the union of two of its members, answering the fractional version of Talagrand's discrete convexity problem. Consequently, we establish two comparison theorems between $p$-spread and product Bernoulli-$p$ measures.

We study the forbidden poset analog of the maximal anti-Ramsey problem introduced for graphs by Burr, Erd\H os, Graham, and Sós. For integers $m\le 2^n$ and poset $P=(P,\preceq)$, we introduce $\mathrm{ar_m}(n,m,P)$ (and $\mathrm{ar^*_m}(n,m,P)$) to denote the minimum integer $k$ such that there exists a family $\mathcal{F}\subseteq 2^{[n]}$ with $|\mathcal{F}|=m$ and a coloring $\mathcal{F}\rightarrow [k]$ with all weak (strong) copies of $P$ being rainbow. As long as there exist $P$-free families of size $m$, these parameters equal 1. It is known that the largest size $La(n,P)$ ($La^*(n,P)$) of weak (strong) $P$-free families has order of magnitude $Θ(\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor})$ unless $P$ is the antichain $A_k$ on $k$ elements. In this paper we study $\mathrm{ar_m}(n,m,P)$ and $\mathrm{ar^*_m}(n,m,P)$ in two regimes of $m$. We determine the asymptotics of these parameters for all posets $P$ when $m=2^n$. We also consider the case $m=Θ(\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor})$. It is shown that for any connected poset $P$ and integer $k$, there exist integers $m_{P,k}$ and $m^*_{P,k}$ such that to color the middle $k$ layers of the Boolean lattice with all weak or strong copies of $P$ being rainbow, one needs $Θ(n^{m_{P,k}})$ or $Θ(n^{m^*_{P,k}})$ colors. For tree posets $T$, one has $m_{T,k}=m^*_{T,k}$. We conjecture that for any tree poset $T$, and positive real $\varepsilon$, $\mathrm{ar_m}(n,m,T),\mathrm{ar^*_m}(n,m,T)=Ω(n^{m_{T,k}})$ holds provided $m\ge (k-1+\varepsilon)\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}$. We prove our conjecture on $\mathrm{ar_m}(n,m,T)$ for an infinite class of tree posets.

We say that an antichain in a lattice $L$ is Boolean if it generates a Boolean sublattice in $L$ in a particularly nice way. These purely combinatorial objects play a role in the representation theory of the incidence algebra of the lattice $L$, as indicated by recent results of Rognerud, Yıldırım and of the last author with Klász, Kleinau and Marczinzik. Given these motivations, it is natural to ask: Can we count and construct Boolean antichains in certain lattices? In this paper we give a construction of Boolean antichains in Boolean lattices, partition lattices and Tamari lattices. Furthermore, we share the surprisingly elegant formulas we found for the number of these Boolean antichains.

For a natural number $n$ let $[n] = \{1,\ldots,n\}$. We say that a family ${\cal{S}}\subseteq 2^{[n]}$ is \emph{representing} if every singleton set of $[n]$ is an intersection of some sets from ${\cal{S}}$. We show that the smallest possible cardinality of a representing set for $[n]$ is the discrete inverse $s(n)$ of the Sperner's function $n\mapsto \binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}$, which by Sperner's Theorem is the maximum number of elements in an antichain in $2^{[n]}$ when viewed as subset (or boolean) lattice. Specifically, $s(n)$ is then the smallest positive integer such that $2^{[n]}$ contains an $n$-element antichain. Some generalization, further applications and asymptotics in terms of the second real branch of the Lambert $W$ function are presented.

We study a local closure operation on the cover edges of a Boolean lattice: whenever the two lower edges or the two upper edges of a square face are present, all four edges of that square are added. We prove that every set of cover edges generating the full cover graph of $\mathcal{B}_n$ has cardinality at least $n$, and we classify all generators attaining this bound. For a graph $G$ on $[n]$, let $S_G=\{N_G(i)\to N_G(i)\cup\{i\}:i\in[n]\}$. Then $S_G$ diamond-generates the full cover graph if and only if $G$ is a cograph, and every minimum-cardinality generator arises uniquely in this way. Consequently, labeled minimum diamond-generating sets of $\mathcal{B}_n$ are in bijection with labeled cographs on $n$ vertices.

We show that for every $η>0$ and sufficiently large $n$, there exists a poset of size $2^{(1+η)n/2}$ containing all the $n$-element posets as induced subposets. This improves a recent result of Bastide, Groenland and Nenadov. Our proof provides a labeling scheme preserving transitivity, inspired by the Boolean lattice. Among other tools, we use the Szemerédi Regularity Lemma.

We nearly settle a natural extremal question about set systems over $[n]$: the tradeoff between the {size} (number of sets) and the number of {full chains}. This question was initially raised by Johnson, Leader, and Russell [Combin.~Probab.~Comp., 2015] as a counterpart to Sperner-type results in combinatorics. Recently, a framework introduced by Ameli, Nederlof, and Wang, and independently by Dallant and Kozma [FOCS 2026] linked this question to the space- and time-complexity of Bellman-Held-Karp-style dynamic programming algorithms for permutation problems such as the traveling salesman (TSP). Precisely, they showed that a space-time product $γ^{n+o(n)}$ is feasible for the TSP, whenever a set system of (normalized) size $S$ and chain density $D$ exists, with $ γ= S^2/D$. In this paper we show an essentially {optimal} bound of $γ\approx 3.1819$ for this quantity, closing the gap between the previous best lower and upper bounds of $γ\geq 3.015$ and $ γ\leq 3.572$ respectively. This implies a TSP algorithm with space-time product $O(3.1819^n)$ for input size $n$, as well as a limit to further improvements in this broad framework. More generally, we can obtain close to optimal values $D$ for any feasible value $S$, effectively settling the question of the number of full chains at every size. The crucial step towards our results is casting the extremal combinatorics question as an {information~vs.~entropy} tradeoff involving two random variables. This reformulation {exactly} captures the optimal tradeoff for the combinatorial problem, leading to a framework in which primal-dual certificates can be derived, proving rigorous upper and lower bounds on $γ$. We also give a further application of our techniques, improving a bound of Duffus, Sands, and Winkler on the minimum size of fibres in the Boolean lattice.

A family $\mathcal{G}$ of sets is a weak copy of the poset $(P,\leqslant)$ if there exists a bijection $ι:P\rightarrow \mathcal{G}$ with $ι(p)\subset ι(q)$ whenever $p\leqslant q$. $\mathcal{G}$ is a strong copy if $ι(p)\subset ι(q)$ if and only if $p\leqslant q$ holds. A family is weak (strong) $P$-free if it does not contain any weak (strong) copies of $P$. For a poset $P$, let $e(P)$ ($e^*(P)$) denote the most number of middle layers of $2^{[n]}$ that does not contain a weak (strong) copy of $P$. Ellis, Ivan, and Leader were the first to show the existence of posets $P$ for which there exists a positive real $\varepsilon_P$ such that $La(n,P)\ge (e(P)+\varepsilon_P)\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2}$ and $La^*(n,P)\ge (e^*(P)+\varepsilon_P)\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2}$ holds, where $La(n,P)$ ($La^*(n,P)$) denotes the maximum size of a weak (strong) $P$-free family $\mathcal{F}\subseteq 2^{[n]}$. More precisely, they showed that $P=B_d$ are such posets for all $d\ge 4$, where $B_d$ is the Boolean lattice ordered by inclusion. Very recently, Tompkins showed that the diamond $B_2$ is also such a poset. In this short note, we apply his method to settle the case of the last Boolean poset $B_3$. We show that there exists a positive $\varepsilon$ such that $$La^*(n,B_3)\ge La(n,B_3)\ge La(n,D_6)\ge (3+\varepsilon)\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor},$$ where $D_6$ is the poset on eight elements $a<b_1,\dots,b_6<c$.

We construct a diamond-free family in the Boolean lattice whose size is asymptotically larger than the union of two middle layers. Denote the diamond poset by $Q_2$ and let $La(n,Q_2)$ be the maximum size of a family in $2^{[n]}$ containing no weak copy of $Q_2$. We prove $La(n,Q_2) \ge (c+o(1))\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}$, where $c \approx 2.147908$. In particular, this disproves the diamond conjecture.

In a 2021 survey on Katona's circle method, Frankl conjectured that every family $\mathcal{F}\subseteq 2^{[n]}$ in which any two members intersect and no two members cover $[n]$ satisfies the sharp Lubell-type bound $ \sum_{F\in \mathcal{F}}\binom{n}{|F|}^{-1}\le \frac{n+1}{6}. $ This improves the earlier estimate $\frac{n}{4}$ obtained by the circle method. In this paper, we prove Frankl's conjecture and determine all extremal families. Our proof replaces the cyclic permutation argument with a $p$-biased measure framework on the Boolean lattice, and then integrates the resulting estimates over the full probability range. This continuous integration recovers the optimal coefficient $\frac{1}{6}$, whereas the discrete averaging inherent in the circle method yields only $\frac{n}{4}$.

Let \(\mathcal{B}_n\) be the Boolean lattice of all subsets of \([n]\) and let \(\mathcal{P}_{n;\ell,u}\) be the subposet of \(\mathcal{B}_n\) induced by the consecutive levels \(\ell,\ell+1,\ldots,u\). We determine $ν_{n;\ell,u}$, the maximum size of a family of pairwise disjoint maximal intervals in $\mathcal P_{n;\ell,u}$, whenever \(u\le ({n+\ell^2})/({\ell+1})\). This completely settles Engel's problem~[Combin. Probab. Comput., 1996]. The proof is constructive. We also record consequences for weakly cross-intersecting set-pair systems and discuss the three-level case.

Let $\mathcal Q=\{Q_a:a\geq1\}$ be a nested family of finite posets such that $Q_a\subseteq Q_{a+1}$ and $|Q_a|<|Q_{a+1}|$. For a poset $Q$, let $\mathcal C_t(Q)$ denote the set of all strict $t$-chains in $Q$. Given an $r$-coloring of $\mathcal C_t(Q_a)$ and posets $P_1,\ldots,P_r$, a weak copy of $P_i$ is called monochromatic of color $i$ if all $t$-chains in the copy have color $i$; the strong version is defined in the same way for induced copies. The corresponding weak and strong multiplicity parameters are the minimum possible total number of such monochromatic copies in the host poset.For the Boolean lattice $B_n$, define $E_n={(S,T,U)\in B_n^3:S\subsetneq T\subsetneq U,\ |S|+|T|=|U|}.$ For a two-coloring $χ:B_n\to{0,1}$, a triple $(S,T,U)\in E_n$ is monochromatic if $χ(S)=χ(T)=χ(U)$. Let $R^{\mathrm{arith}}_2$ be the least integer $n$ such that every two-coloring of $B_n$ contains a monochromatic triple in $E_n$, and let $M^{\mathrm{arith}}_2(B_n)$ be the minimum number of monochromatic triples in $E_n$ over all two-colorings of $B_n$. We prove that $R^{\mathrm{arith}}_2=9.$ Moreover, $|E_n|=\binom{2n}{n}-[x^n](1+x+x^2)^n-2^n+1=\frac{4^n}{\sqrt{πn}}\bigl(1+o(1)\bigr),$ and $2^{δn+o(n)}\le M^{\mathrm{arith}}_2(B_n)\le 2^{γn+o(n)}, $ where $δ\approx 1.356779$ and $γ\approx 1.567837$ are explicit entropy constants. For general nested host families, we prove a double-counting lower bound for strong poset multiplicity. For an arbitrary finite host poset $R$, we also introduce a Fourier-Möbius method and give an exact Fourier expansion for strong multiplicity, a Parseval-type error bound, and a spectral lower bound.

The Boolean lattice $BL_n$, $n\geq 3$, is the graph whose vertex set is the collection of all subsets of $[n]=\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$, where two subsets $U$ and $W$ are adjacent if and only if their symmetric difference has precisely one element. In the graph $BL_n$, the \emph{layer} $L_k$ is the family of all $k$-element subsets of $[n]$. The subgraph $BL_n(k-1,k)$ is the induced subgraph of $BL_n$ on layers $L_{k-1}$ and $L_{k}$. This graph is bipartite and, when $n=2k-1$, is $k$-regular and isomorphic to the bipartite double cover $2{\cdot}O_k$ of the odd graph $O_k$. In this paper, we determine the full adjacency spectrum -- eigenvalues together with their multiplicities -- of the line graph $L(BL_n(k-1,k))$ for all admissible values of $n$ and $k$. As a consequence, we show that $L(BL_n(k-1,k))$ is an integral graph whenever $n = 2k-1$, and we recover as a special case the spectrum of the line graph $L(n)$ of $BL_n(1,2)$ established by Mirafzal~\cite{pap-sm-1}.

For integers $1\le r\le n+1$, let $N(n,r)$ denote the least number of chains in the Boolean lattice $B_n=2^{[n]}$ that cover every strict $r$-term chain. The case $r=1$ is the classical chain-decomposition problem and is generalizing Dilworth's theorem and Sperner's theorem. We study two complementary regimes. First, when $r>1$ is fixed and $n\to\infty$. Let $$M(n,r):= \max_{\substack{ a_0+\cdots+a_r=n a_0,a_r\ge 0,\ a_i\ge 1\ (1\le i\le r-1) }} \binom{n}{a_0,\ldots,a_r}.$$ We prove that lower and upper bounds which differ only by a logarithmic factor: $$ M(n,r)\le N(n,r)\le \left(\frac r2+o(1)\right)\log n\cdot M(n,r).$$ Second, we consider the near-maximal regime $N(n,n-t)$, where $t>0$ is fixed. We prove a general upper bound $ N(n,n-t)\le \frac{n!}{t}$ using the inversion number of the permutations modulo $t$. This is exact for $t=2$, giving $N(n,n-2)=n!/2$, and asymptotically exact for $t=3$, giving $N(n,n-3)=\left(\frac13+o(1)\right)n!.$ The matching lower bound for $t=3$, and stronger lower bounds for all fixed $t$, come from subcube-hitting problems originated from Kostochka and vertex-Turán problems.

The paper studies the graph algebra whose monomial basis is naturally indexed by simple graphs on a fixed set of vertices. This algebra is at the same time the algebra of pseudo-Boolean functions on the Boolean cube and a natural object of algebraic combinatorics, related to the Boolean lattice of subsets of the edge set of the complete graph. The main aim of the paper is to study two compatible representation-theoretic structures on this algebra: the action of the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{sl}_2$, arising from the operators of adding and deleting one edge, and the action of the pair group $S_n^{(2)}$, induced by the renumbering of vertices. It is proved that the graph algebra with this $\mathfrak{sl}_2$-action is isomorphic to a tensor power of the standard two-dimensional $\mathfrak{sl}_2$-module, and on this basis its decomposition into irreducible $\mathfrak{sl}_2$-modules is obtained. Primitive spaces, that is, the kernels of the edge-deletion operator on rank components, are also described, and it is shown that they have a natural interpretation in terms of two-row Specht modules. It is then established that the $\mathfrak{sl}_2$-action commutes with the action of the pair group. It follows that the space of graph invariants also inherits the structure of an $\mathfrak{sl}_2$-module. Using Schur--Weyl duality, primitive invariants are described through the fixed parts of the restrictions of two-row Specht modules from the full symmetric group on the edge set to the pair group. As a consequence, the classical enumeration of non-isomorphic graphs by the number of edges receives a representation-theoretic refinement: the orbital components entering the Burnside--Polya formula decompose into natural primitive contributions associated with the $\mathfrak{sl}_2$-structure and two-row Specht modules.

Daisy cubes are partial cubes whose vertices can be represented by a down-set of a Boolean lattice. This paper gives a label-free characterization: a finite partial cube is a daisy cube if and only if every Djoković--Winkler $Θ$-class is peripheral. The proof orients each $Θ$-class toward a peripheral halfspace and shows that the resulting $Θ$-coordinate labels are closed downward. The characterization turns recognition into a condition on the halfspace structure and gives an exact obstruction formulation: the minimal forbidden pc-minors for daisy cubes are precisely the pc-minor-minimal partial cubes containing a non-peripheral $Θ$-class. We also give an infinite product family of such obstructions. For all $r\ge 2$ and $s\ge 1$, the graph obtained from $P_3^{\square r}\sq Q_s$ by deleting the two opposite corners is a minimal forbidden partial cube-minor for the class of daisy cubes.

We study balanced subfamilies of the middle layer $\binom{[2n]}{n}$ of the Boolean lattice $2^{[2n]}$. A family $\mathcal{F}\subseteq\binom{[2n]}{n}$ is said to be balanced if every element in $[2n]$ appears in the same number of members of $\mathcal{F}$. A balanced subfamily of size 2 is exactly a complementary pair $\{A,[2n]\setminus A\}$, and therefore a family with no balanced subfamily of size $2$ has at most $\frac{1}{2}\binom{2n}{n}$ members. We show that for every $k\geq 1$ and all sufficiently large $n$, this maximum size is compatible with delaying the smallest size of a balanced subfamily until $2k+2$. More precisely, there exists a family $\mathcal{F}\subseteq\binom{[2n]}{n}$ of size $\frac{1}{2}\binom{2n}{n}$ with no balanced subfamilies of sizes $2,4,\ldots,2k$, but with a balanced subfamily of size $2k+2$. The proof is constructive and is obtained by lifting Taylor-Zwicker trade-robust magic-square games to self-dual selectors in the middle layer. This proves a recent conjecture of Moss and Pedersen.

We study the problem of enumerating symmetric chain decompositions (SCDs) of the minuscule lattices $L(m,n)$ of partitions in an $m$ by $n$ box and $M(n)$ of partitions into distinct parts at most $n$. We shift the focus from constructing a single SCD to analyzing the global structure of the set of SCDs. Let $\#SCD(P)$ be the number of symmetric chain decompositions of $P$. We give an explicit formula for $\#SCD(L(2,n))$ based on inversion sets of permutations and conjecture that for fixed $m>1$ both $\#SCD(L(m,n))$ and $\#SCD(M(n))$ grow super-exponentially. These conjectures are supported by data produced by AlphaEvolve, an evolutionary coding agent from Google DeepMind, and are in the same vein as a recent paper of Tomon on the growth rate of $\#SCD$ for the Boolean lattice and hypergrid. We make connections with crystal bases and show that the Lusztig involution (evacuation) extends to an involution on SCDs, which we use to show that $\#SCD(M(n))$ is even for $n>2$. We use skew tableaux sequences, which are equivalent to SCDs, and describe a potential path forward for finding SCDs through a notion of tableaux avoidance. We discuss implications of the conjectures for the problem of computing plethysm coefficients and discuss connections to physics and geometry. We end with a list of conjectures, questions and open problems.

Dedekind's problem counts monotone Boolean functions, equivalently downsets of a Boolean lattice. We recast this enumeration as a finite layer-ratio reconstruction problem for the Whitney numbers of the ranked ideal lattice. An exact adjacent-layer double count expresses each layer ratio through local averages of the number of addable elements and the number of removable elements. Reversible fixed-layer Markov chains estimate these averages and hence estimate the Dedekind number M(n). Backtests at M(8) and M(9) calibrate seed-level variability under the fixed protocol and measure the observed Monte Carlo budget scaling. The resulting estimate probes the Whitney-number sequence of the ideal lattice. Although these rows have previously been described empirically as unimodal, the high-precision n=9 estimate has a shallow two-shoulder feature around the central rank, contrary to that empirical description; n=11 and n=13 center-window estimates show a larger-contrast analogous pattern. The protocol estimate for M(10) is \[ \widehat M(10)=(8.9360\pm0.0010)\times 10^{78}, \] where the displayed uncertainty is the budget-based forecast scale from the cross-n scaling law under the production budget.

We introduce weak and strong poset Ramsey-Turán numbers for $t$-chains in host poset families, focusing on the Boolean lattice family $\mathcal{B}=\{B_n:n\ge 1\}$. For any poset $P$, we show $\operatorname{RT}(\mathcal{B};n,P,l,t)\le \operatorname{RT}^{\sharp}(\mathcal{B};n,P,l,t)$, with equality when $P$ is a chain. In particular, for $t=1$, $\operatorname{RT}(\mathcal{B};n,C_k,l)=\operatorname{RT}^{\sharp}(\mathcal{B};n,C_k,l)=(k-1)(l-1)$. We also give universal upper bounds for both versions. For fixed $k,l,t$ with $\min\{l-1,k-1\}\ge 1$, we prove $\operatorname{RT}^{\sharp}(\mathcal{B};n,A_k,l,t)=Θ(n^t)$. More generally, for every non-chain poset $P$, the strong number is $Θ(n^t)$ for fixed $l,t$. Finally, if $h(P)=r>t$ and $l(n)=\lfloor M_n^β\rfloor$ with $0<β\le α<1$, then both weak and strong versions admit lower bounds of order $Ω\!\left(2^{βn}n^{-β/2}\right)$.