arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study the forbidden poset analog of the maximal anti-Ramsey problem introduced for graphs by Burr, Erd\H os, Graham, and Sós. For integers $m\le 2^n$ and poset $P=(P,\preceq)$, we introduce $\mathrm{ar_m}(n,m,P)$ (and $\mathrm{ar^*_m}(n,m,P)$) to denote the minimum integer $k$ such that there exists a family $\mathcal{F}\subseteq 2^{[n]}$ with $|\mathcal{F}|=m$ and a coloring $\mathcal{F}\rightarrow [k]$ with all weak (strong) copies of $P$ being rainbow. As long as there exist $P$-free families of size $m$, these parameters equal 1. It is known that the largest size $La(n,P)$ ($La^*(n,P)$) of weak (strong) $P$-free families has order of magnitude $Θ(\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor})$ unless $P$ is the antichain $A_k$ on $k$ elements. In this paper we study $\mathrm{ar_m}(n,m,P)$ and $\mathrm{ar^*_m}(n,m,P)$ in two regimes of $m$. We determine the asymptotics of these parameters for all posets $P$ when $m=2^n$. We also consider the case $m=Θ(\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor})$. It is shown that for any connected poset $P$ and integer $k$, there exist integers $m_{P,k}$ and $m^*_{P,k}$ such that to color the middle $k$ layers of the Boolean lattice with all weak or strong copies of $P$ being rainbow, one needs $Θ(n^{m_{P,k}})$ or $Θ(n^{m^*_{P,k}})$ colors. For tree posets $T$, one has $m_{T,k}=m^*_{T,k}$. We conjecture that for any tree poset $T$, and positive real $\varepsilon$, $\mathrm{ar_m}(n,m,T),\mathrm{ar^*_m}(n,m,T)=Ω(n^{m_{T,k}})$ holds provided $m\ge (k-1+\varepsilon)\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}$. We prove our conjecture on $\mathrm{ar_m}(n,m,T)$ for an infinite class of tree posets.

The maximum size of a weak $P$-free family $\mathcal{F}\subseteq 2^{[n]}$ is denoted by $La(n,P)$. Let $e(P)$ denote the maximum integer $k$ such that the union of any $k$ consecutive layers of $2^{[n]}$ is weak $P$-free. In recent years, multiple examples of posets with $e(P)<π^-(P):=\liminf_{n\to\infty} \frac{La(n,P)}{\binom{n}{\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\rfloor}}$ have been found. We add several further posets with $e(P)=1$ to this list. We define a family $\mathcal{F}\subseteq 2^{[n]}$ of size at least $(1.22+o(1))\binom{n}{\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\rfloor}$ that is weak $O_6$-free, where $O_6$ is the six-element crown poset. We also show an infinite set of posets $P$ with $1=e(P)<π^-(P)$ that are minimal with respect to this property. Finally, we consider how far apart $e(P)$ and $π^-(P)$ can be. We prove that for every fixed finite poset $P$ with $e(P)=1$, there is a constant $δ_P>0$ such that $La(n,P)\le(2-δ_P+o(1))\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}$. The value 2 is optimal: explicit vertex-edge incidence posets with $e(P)=1$ have $π^-(P)$ values tending to $2$. In contrast, for every $K>0$ we construct a finite poset $P$ with $e(P)=2$ and lower density greater than $K$.

We study a variant of Cops and Robbers in which the robber attempts to visit as many vertices of the graph as possible without being captured, while the cop aims to keep the robber confined to a small set of vertices. The \textit{damage number} of a graph $G$, introduced by Cox and Sanaei in 2019, is the maximum number of vertices the robber can visit in a game of Cops and Robbers on $G$. In this paper, we determine damage numbers for several classes of graphs, including hypercubes, Hamming graphs, Johnson graphs, incidence graphs of projective planes, and Erdős-Rényi random graph $G(n,p)$, for $p \gg \log^{2/5}(n) / n^{1/5}$. We also show that the problem of determining the damage number of a graph is {\sf PSPACE}-complete.

A family $\mathcal{G}$ of sets is a weak copy of the poset $(P,\leqslant)$ if there exists a bijection $ι:P\rightarrow \mathcal{G}$ with $ι(p)\subset ι(q)$ whenever $p\leqslant q$. $\mathcal{G}$ is a strong copy if $ι(p)\subset ι(q)$ if and only if $p\leqslant q$ holds. A family is weak (strong) $P$-free if it does not contain any weak (strong) copies of $P$. For a poset $P$, let $e(P)$ ($e^*(P)$) denote the most number of middle layers of $2^{[n]}$ that does not contain a weak (strong) copy of $P$. Ellis, Ivan, and Leader were the first to show the existence of posets $P$ for which there exists a positive real $\varepsilon_P$ such that $La(n,P)\ge (e(P)+\varepsilon_P)\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2}$ and $La^*(n,P)\ge (e^*(P)+\varepsilon_P)\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2}$ holds, where $La(n,P)$ ($La^*(n,P)$) denotes the maximum size of a weak (strong) $P$-free family $\mathcal{F}\subseteq 2^{[n]}$. More precisely, they showed that $P=B_d$ are such posets for all $d\ge 4$, where $B_d$ is the Boolean lattice ordered by inclusion. Very recently, Tompkins showed that the diamond $B_2$ is also such a poset. In this short note, we apply his method to settle the case of the last Boolean poset $B_3$. We show that there exists a positive $\varepsilon$ such that $$La^*(n,B_3)\ge La(n,B_3)\ge La(n,D_6)\ge (3+\varepsilon)\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor},$$ where $D_6$ is the poset on eight elements $a<b_1,\dots,b_6<c$.

For integers $1\le r\le n+1$, let $N(n,r)$ denote the least number of chains in the Boolean lattice $B_n=2^{[n]}$ that cover every strict $r$-term chain. The case $r=1$ is the classical chain-decomposition problem and is generalizing Dilworth's theorem and Sperner's theorem. We study two complementary regimes. First, when $r>1$ is fixed and $n\to\infty$. Let $$M(n,r):= \max_{\substack{ a_0+\cdots+a_r=n a_0,a_r\ge 0,\ a_i\ge 1\ (1\le i\le r-1) }} \binom{n}{a_0,\ldots,a_r}.$$ We prove that lower and upper bounds which differ only by a logarithmic factor: $$ M(n,r)\le N(n,r)\le \left(\frac r2+o(1)\right)\log n\cdot M(n,r).$$ Second, we consider the near-maximal regime $N(n,n-t)$, where $t>0$ is fixed. We prove a general upper bound $ N(n,n-t)\le \frac{n!}{t}$ using the inversion number of the permutations modulo $t$. This is exact for $t=2$, giving $N(n,n-2)=n!/2$, and asymptotically exact for $t=3$, giving $N(n,n-3)=\left(\frac13+o(1)\right)n!.$ The matching lower bound for $t=3$, and stronger lower bounds for all fixed $t$, come from subcube-hitting problems originated from Kostochka and vertex-Turán problems.

A family $\mathcal{G}$ of sets is a weak copy of a poset $P$ if there is a bijection $f:P\rightarrow \mathcal{G}$ such that $p\leqslant q$ implies $f(p)\subseteq f(q)$. If $f$ satisfies $p\leqslant q$ if and only if $f(p)\subseteq f(q)$, the $\mathcal{G}$ is a strong copy of $P$. We study the anti-Ramsey numbers $\mathrm{ar}(n,P), \mathrm{ar^*}(n,P)$, the maximum number of colors used in a coloring of $2^{[n]}$ that does not admit a rainbow weak or strong copy of $P$, respectively. We establish connections to the well-studied extremal numbers $\mathrm{La}(n,P)$ and $\mathrm{La^*}(n,P)$ and determine asymptotically $\mathrm{ar^*}(n,T)$ for all tree posets $T$ and $\mathrm{ar^*}(n,O_{2k})$ for all crown posets $O_{2k}$.

A family $\mathcal{G}$ of sets is a copy of a poset $(P,\leqslant)$ if $(\mathcal{G},\subseteq)$ is isomorphic to $(P,\leqslant)$. The forbidden subposet problem asks for determining $La^*(n,P)$, the maximum size of a family $\mathcal{F}\subseteq 2^{[n]}$ that does not contain any copy of $P$. We study the rainbow version of this problem: what is the maximum size $La_R^*(n,P)$ of a family $\mathcal{F}=\cup_{i=1}^mA^i$ such that all $A^i$ are antichains and there is no copy of $P$ with all sets coming from distinct $A^i$ or equivalently $\mathcal{F}$ admits a proper coloring (sets $F\subset F'$ must receive different colors) with no rainbow copy of $P$. A poset $(Q,\leqslant')$ rainbow forces $(P,\leqslant)$ if any proper coloring $c$ of $Q$ ($q\leqslant' q'$ or $q'\leqslant' q$ implies $c(q)\neq c(q')$) admits a rainbow copy of $P$. We establish connection between the $La^*$ and the $La^*_R$ functions via poset rainbow forcing, determine the asymptotics of $La_R^*(n,T)$ for all tree posets and obtain further exact or asymptotic results for antichains and complete bipartite posets.

We study the number of distance queries needed to identify certain properties of a hidden tree $T$ on $n$ vertices. A distance query consists of two vertices $x,y$, and the answer is the distance of $x$ and $y$ in $T$. We determine the number of queries an optimal adaptive algorithm needs to find two vertices of maximal distance up to an additive constant, and the number of queries needed to identify the hidden tree asymptotically. We also study the non-adaptive versions of these problems, determining the number of queries needed exactly.

An abstract simplicial complex $\mathbf{F}$ is a non-uniform hypergraph without isolated vertices, whose edge set is closed under taking subsets. The extremal number $\mathrm{ex}(n,\mathbf{F})$ is the maximum number of edges in an $\mathbf{F}$-free simplicial complex on $n$ vertices. This extremal number is naturally related to the generalised Turán numbers of certain underlying hypergraphs. Making progress in a problem raised by Conlon, Piga, and Schülke, we find large classes of simplicial complexes whose extremal numbers are determined by the respective generalised hypergraph Turán numbers. We also provide simplicial complexes for which such a relation does not hold.

A family $\mathcal{G}$ of sets is a(n induced) copy of a poset $P=(P,\leqslant)$ if there exists a bijection $b:P\rightarrow \mathcal{G}$ such that $p\leqslant q$ holds if and only if $b(p)\subseteq b(q)$. The induced saturation number sat$^*(n,P)$ is the minimum size of a family $\mathcal{F}\subseteq 2^{[n]}$ that does not contain any copy of $P$, but for any $G\in 2^{[n]}\setminus \mathcal{F}$, the family $\mathcal{F}\cup \{G\}$ contains a copy of $P$. We consider sat$^*(n,P)$ for posets $P$ that are formed by pairwise incomparable chains, i.e. $P=\bigoplus_{j=1}^mC_{i_j}$. We make the following two conjectures: (i) sat$^*(n,P)=O(n)$ for all such posets and (ii) sat$^*(n,P)=O(1)$ if not all chains are of the same size. (The second conjecture is known to hold if there is a unique longest among the chains.) We verify these conjectures in some special cases: we prove (i) if all chains are of the same length, we prove (ii) in the first unknown general case: for posets $2C_k+C_1$. Finally, we give an infinite number of examples showing that (ii) is not a necessary condition for sat$^*(n,P)=O(1)$ among posets $P=\bigoplus_{j=1}^mC_{i_j}$: we prove sat$^*(n,(\binom{2t}{t}+1)C_2)=O(1)$ for all $t\ge 1$.

We start a systematic investigation concerning bipartite Turán number for trees. For a graph $F$ and integers $1 \leq a \leq b$ we define: $(i)$\quad $ex_b(a, b, F)$ is the largest number of edges that an $F$-free bipartite graph can have with part sizes $a$ and $b$. We write $ex_b(n, F)$ for $ex_b(n, n, F)$. $(ii)$\quad $ex_{b,c}(a, b, F)$ is the largest number of edges that an $F$-free connected, bipartite graph can have with part sizes $a$ and $b$. We write $ex_{b,c}(n, F)$ for $ex{b,c}(n, n, F)$. Both definitions are similar for a family $\mathcal{F}$ of graphs. We prove general lower bounds depending on the maximum degree of $F$, as well as on the cardinalities of the two vertex classes of $F$. We derive upper and lower bounds for $ex_b(n,F)$ in terms of $ex(2n,F)$ and $ex(n, F)$, the corresponding classical (not bipartite) Turán numbers. We solve both problems for various classes of graphs, including all trees up to six vertices for any $n$, for double stars $D_{s ,t}$ if $a \geq f(s,t )$, for some families of spiders, and more. We use these results to supply an answer to a problem raised by L. T. Yuan and X. D. Zhang [{\it Graphs and Combinatorics}, 2017] concerning $ex_b( n, \mathcal{T}_{k,\ell} )$, where $\mathcal{T}_{k,\ell}$ is the family of all trees with vertex classes of respective cardinalities $k$ and $\ell$. The asymptotic worst-case ratios between Turán-type functions are also inverstigated.

For a family $\mathcal{F}$ of sets and a disjoint pair $A,B$ we let $\mathcal{F}(A,\overline{B})=\{F\in \mathcal{F}: A\subseteq F, ~B\cap F=\emptyset\}$. The \textbf{$(p,q)$-dömdödöm} of a family $\mathcal{F}\subseteq 2^{[n]}$ is $β_{p,q}(\mathcal{F})=\min\{|\mathcal{F}(A,\overline{B})|:|A|=p,|B|=q, A\cap B=\emptyset, A,B\subseteq [n]\} $. This definition encompasses size, diversity, minimum degree, and sturdiness as special cases. We investigate the maximum possible value $β_{p,q}(n,k)$ of $β_{p,q}(\mathcal{F})$ over all $k$-uniform intersecting families $\mathcal{F}\subset 2^{[n]}$. We determine the order of magnitude of $β_{p,q}(n,k)$ for all fixed $p,q,k$. We relate the asymptotics of $β_{p,q}(n,k)$ to the constant value of $β_{0,q}(n,q+1)$ and establish $β_{p,1}(n,k)=\binom{n-3-p}{k-2-p}$ and $β_{p,2}(n,k)=2\binom{n-5}{k-3-p}-\binom{n-7}{k-5-p}$ if $n$ is large enough.

We study the number of queries needed to identify a monotone Boolean function $f:\{0,1\}^n \rightarrow \{0,1\}$. A query consists of a 0-1-sequence, and the answer is the value of $f$ on that sequence. It is well-known that the number of queries needed is $\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}+\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor+1}$ in general. Here we study a variant where $f$ has $k$ ``reasons'' to be 1, i.e., its disjunctive normal form has $k$ conjunctions if the redundant conjunctions are deleted. This problem is equivalent to identifying an upfamily in $2^{[n]}$ that has exactly $k$ minimal members. We find the asymptotics on the number of queries needed for fixed $k$. We also study the non-adaptive version of the problem, where the queries are asked at the same time, and determine the exact number of queries for most values of $k$ and $n$.

A classical result of Kleitman determines the maximum number $f(n,s)$ of subsets in a family $\mathcal{F}\subseteq 2^{[n]}$ of sets that do not contain distinct sets $F_1,F_2,\dots,F_s$ that are pairwise disjoint in the case $n\equiv 0,-1$ (mod $s$). Katona and Nagy determined the maximum size of a family of subsets of an $n$-element set that does not contain $A_1,A_2,\dots,A_t,B_1,B_2,\dots,B_t$ with $\bigcup_{i=1}^t A_i$ and $\bigcup_{i=1}^t B_i$ being disjoint. In this paper, we consider the problem of finding the maximum number $vex(n,K_{s\times t})$ in a family $\mathcal{F}\subseteq 2^{[n]}$ without sets $F^1_1,\dots,F^1_t,\dots,F^s_1,\dots,F^s_t$ such that $G_j=\bigcup_{i=1}^tF^j_i$ $j=1,2,\dots,s$ are pairwise disjoint. We determine the asymptotics of $2^n-vex(n,K_{s\times t})$ if $n\equiv -1$ (mod $s$) for all $t$, and if $n\equiv 0$ (mod $s$), $t\ge 3$ and show that in this latter case the asymptotics of the $t=2$ subcase is different from both the $t=1$ and $t\ge 3$ subcases.

The Erd\H os Matching Conjecture states that the maximum size $f(n,k,s)$ of a family $\mathcal{F}\subseteq \binom{[n]}{k}$ that does not contain $s$ pairwise disjoint sets is $\max\{|\mathcal{A}_{k,s}|,|\mathcal{B}_{n,k,s}|\}$, where $\mathcal{A}_{k,s}=\binom{[sk-1]}{k}$ and $\mathcal{B}_{n,k,s}=\{B\in \binom{[n]}{k}:B\cap [s-1]\neq \emptyset\}$. The case $s=2$ is simply the Erdős-Ko-Rado theorem on intersecting families and is well understood. The case $n=sk$ was settled by Kleitman and the uniqueness of the extremal construction was obtained by Frankl. Most results in this area show that if $k,s$ are fixed and $n$ is large enough, then the conjecture holds true. Exceptions are due to Frankl who proved the conjecture and considered variants for $n\in [sk,sk+c_{s,k}]$ if $s$ is large enough compared to $k$. A recent manuscript by Guo and Lu considers non-trivial families with matching number at most $s$ in a similar range of parameters. In this short note, we are concerned with the case $s\ge 3$ fixed, $k$ tending to infinity and $n\in\{sk,sk+1\}$. For $n=sk$, we show the stability of the unique extremal construction of size $\binom{sk-1}{k}=\frac{s-1}{s}\binom{sk}{k}$ with respect to minimal degree. As a consequence we derive $\lim\limits_{k\rightarrow \infty}\frac{f(sk+1,k,s)}{\binom{sk+1}{k}}<\frac{s-1}{s}-\varepsilon_s$ for some positive constant $\varepsilon_s$ which depends only on $s$.

We study the following game version of the generalized graph Turán problem. For two fixed graphs F and H, two players, Max and Mini, alternately claim unclaimed edges of the complete graph Kn such that the graph G of the claimed edges must remain F-free throughout the game. The game ends when no further edges can be claimed, i.e. when G becomes F-saturated. The H-score of the game is the number of copies of H in G. Max aims to maximize the H-score, while Mini wants to minimize it. The H-score of the game when both players play optimally is denoted by s1(n, #H, F) when Max starts, and by s2(n, #H, F) when Mini starts. We study these values for several natural choices of F and H.

The Kneser cube $Kn_n$ has vertex set $2^{[n]}$ and two vertices $F,F'$ are joined by an edge if and only if $F\cap F'=\emptyset$. For a fixed graph $G$, we are interested in the most number $vex(n,G)$ of vertices of $Kn_n$ that span a $G$-free subgraph in $Kn_n$. We show that the asymptotics of $vex(n,G)$ is $(1+o(1))2^{n-1}$ for bipartite $G$ and $(1-o(1))2^n$ for graphs with chromatic number at least 3. We also obtain results on the order of magnitude of $2^{n-1}-vex(n,G)$ and $2^n-vex(n,G)$ in these two cases. In the case of bipartite $G$, we relate this problem to instances of the forbidden subposet problem.

In this paper, we address problems related to parameters concerning edge mappings of graphs. Inspired by Ramsey's Theorem, the quantity $m(G, H)$ is defined to be the minimum number $n$ such that for every $f: E(K_n) \rightarrow E(K_n)$ either there is a fixed copy of $G$ with $f ( e) = e$ for all $e\in E(G)$, or a free copy of $H$ with $f( e) \notin E(H)$ for all $e\in E(H)$. We extend many old results from the 80's as well as proving many new results. We also consider several new interesting parameters with the same spirit.

In this paper, we address problems related to parameters concerning edge mappings of graphs. The quantity $h(n,G)$ is defined to be the maximum number of edges in an $n$-vertex graph $H$ such that there exists a mapping $f: E(H)\rightarrow E(H)$ with $f(e)\neq e$ for all $e\in E$ and further in all copies $G'$ of $G$ in $H$ there exists $e\in E(G')$ with $f(e)\in E(G')$. Among other results, we determine $h(n, G)$ when $G$ is a matching and $n$ is large enough. As a related concept, we say that $H$ is unavoidable for $G$ if for any mapping $f: E(H)\rightarrow E(H)$ with $f(e)\neq e$ there exists a copy $G'$ of $G$ in $H$ such that $f(e)\notin E(G')$ for all $e\in E(G)$. The set of minimal unavoidable graphs for $G$ is denoted by $\mathcal{M}(G)$. We prove that if $F$ is a forest, then $\mathcal{M}(F)$ is finite if and only if $F$ is a matching, and we conjecture that for all non-forest graphs $G$, the set $\mathcal{M}(G)$ is infinite. Several other parameters are defined with basic results proved. Lots of open problems remain.

We study the query complexity on slices of Boolean functions. Among other results we show that there exists a Boolean function for which we need to query all but 7 input bits to compute its value, even if we know beforehand that the number of 0's and 1's in the input are the same, i.e., when our input is from the middle slice. This answers a question of Byramji. Our proof is non-constructive, but we also propose a concrete candidate function that might have the above property. Our results are related to certain natural discrepancy type questions that, somewhat surprisingly, have not been studied before.