arXiv++ Combinatorics

We consider the following combinatorial game: two players, Fast and Slow, claim $k$-element subsets of $[n]=\{1,2,...,n\}$ alternately, one at each turn, such that both players are allowed to pick sets that intersect all previously claimed subsets. The game ends when there does not exist any unclaimed $k$-subset that meets all already claimed sets. The score of the game is the number of sets claimed by the two players, the aim of Fast is to keep the score as low as possible, while the aim of Slow is to postpone the game's end as long as possible. The game saturation number is the score of the game when both players play according to an optimal strategy. To be precise we have to distinguish two cases depending on which player takes the first move. Let $gsat_F(\mathbb{I}_{n,k})$ and $gsat_S(\mathbb{I}_{n,k})$ denote the score of the saturation game when both players play according to an optimal strategy and the game starts with Fast's or Slow's move, respectively. We prove that $Ω_k(n^{k/3-5}) \le gsat_F(\mathbb{I}_{n,k}),gsat_S(\mathbb{I}_{n,k}) \le O_k(n^{k-\sqrt{k}/2})$ holds.

A coloring $c$ of the vertices of a graph $G$ is nonrepetitive if there exists no path $v_1v_2\ldots v_{2l}$ for which $c(v_i)=c(v_{l+i})$ for all $1\le i\le l$. Given graphs $G$ and $H$ with $|V(H)|=k$, the lexicographic product $G[H]$ is the graph obtained by substituting every vertex of $G$ by a copy of $H$, and every edge of $G$ by a copy of $K_{k,k}$. %Our main results are the following. We prove that for a sufficiently long path $P$, a nonrepetitive coloring of $P[K_k]$ needs at least $3k+\lfloor k/2\rfloor$ colors. If $k>2$ then we need exactly $2k+1$ colors to nonrepetitively color $P[E_k]$, where $E_k$ is the empty graph on $k$ vertices. If we further require that every copy of $E_k$ be rainbow-colored and the path $P$ is sufficiently long, then the smallest number of colors needed for $P[E_k]$ is at least $3k+1$ and at most $3k+\lceil k/2\rceil$. Finally, we define fractional nonrepetitive colorings of graphs and consider the connections between this notion and the above results.

A well-known theorem of de Bruijn and Erdős states that any set of $n$ non-collinear points in the plane determines at least $n$ lines. Chen and Chvátal asked whether an analogous statement holds within the framework of finite metric spaces, with lines defined using the notion of {\em betweenness}. In this paper, we prove that the answer is affirmative for sets of $n$ points in the plane with the $L_1$ metric, provided that no two points share their $x$- or $y$-coordinate. In this case, either there is a line that contains all $n$ points, or $X$ induces at least $n$ distinct lines. If points of $X$ are allowed to share their coordinates, then either there is a line that contains all $n$ points, or $X$ induces at least $n/37$ distinct lines.

A family $\cF\subseteq 2^{[n]}$ of sets is said to be $l$-trace $k$-Sperner if for any $l$-subset $L \subset [n]$ the family $\cF|_L=\{F|_L:F \in \cF\}=\{F \cap L: F \in \cF\}$ is $k$-Sperner, i.e. does not contain any chain of length $k+1$. The maximum size that an $l$-trace $k$-Sperner family $\cF \subseteq 2^{[n]}$ can have is denoted by $f(n,k,l)$. For pairs of integers $l<k$, if in a family $\cG$ every pair of sets satisfies $||G_1|-|G_2||<k-l$, then $\cG$ possesses the $(n-l)$-trace $k$-Sperner property. Among such families, the largest one is $\cF_0=\{F\in 2^{[n]}: \lfloor \frac{n-(k-l)}{2}\rfloor+1 \le |F| \le \lfloor \frac{n-(k-l)}{2}\rfloor +k-l\}$ and also $\cF'_0=\{F\in 2^{[n]}: \lfloor \frac{n-(k-l)}{2}\rfloor \le |F| \le \lfloor \frac{n-(k-l)}{2}\rfloor +k-l-1\}$ if $n-(k-l)$ is even. In an earlier paper, we proved that this is asymptotically optimal for all pair of integers $l<k$, i.e. $f(n,k,n-l)=(1+o(1))|\cF_0|$. In this paper we consider the case when $l=1$, $k\ge 2$, and prove that $f(n,k,n-1)=|\cF_0|$ provided $n$ is large enough. We also prove that the unique $(n-1)$-trace $k$-Sperner family with size $f(n,k,n-1)$ is $\cF_0$ and also $\cF'_0$ when $n+k$ is odd.

Given a set of n balls each colored with a color, a ball is said to be majority, k-majority, plurality if its color class has size larger than half of the number of balls, has size at least k, has size larger than any other color class; respectively. We address the problem of finding the minimum number of queries (a comparison of a pair of balls if they have the same color or not) that is needed to decide whether a majority, k-majority or plurality ball exists and if so then show one such ball. We consider both adaptive and non-adaptive strategies and in certain cases, we also address weighted versions of the problems.

A family of sets $\mathcal{F} \subseteq 2^{[n]}$ is defined to be $l$-trace $k$-Sperner if for any $l$-subset $L$ of $[n]$ the family of traces $\mathcal{F}|_L=\{F \cap L: F \in \mathcal{F}\}$ does not contain any chain of length $k+1$. In this paper we prove that for any positive integers $l',k$ with $l'<k$ if $\mathcal{F}$ is $(n-l')$-trace $k$-Sperner, then $|\mathcal{F}| \le (k-l'+o(1))\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}$ and this bound is asymptotically tight.

The two part Sperner theorem of Katona and Kleitman states that if $X$ is an $n$-element set with partition $X_1 \cup X_2$, and $\cF$ is a family of subsets of $X$ such that no two sets $A, B \in \cF$ satisfy $A \subset B$ (or $B \subset A$) and $A \cap X_i=B \cap X_i$ for some $i$, then $|\cF| \le {n \choose \lfloor n/2 \rfloor}$. We consider variations of this problem by replacing the Sperner property with the intersection property and considering families that satisfiy various combinations of these properties on one or both parts $X_1$, $X_2$. Along the way, we prove the following new result which may be of independent interest: let $\cF, \cG$ be families of subsets of an $n$-element set such that $\cF$ and $\cG$ are both intersecting and cross-Sperner, meaning that if $A \in \cF$ and $B \in \cG$, then $A \not\subset B$ and $B \not\subset A$. Then $|\cF| +|\cG| < 2^{n-1}$ and there are exponentially many examples showing that this bound is tight.

To study how balanced or unbalanced a maximal intersecting family $\mathcal{F}\subseteq \binom{[n]}{r}$ is we consider the ratio $\mathcal{R}(\mathcal{F})=\frac{Δ(\mathcal{F})}{δ(\mathcal{F})}$ of its maximum and minimum degree. We determine the order of magnitude of the function $m(n,r)$, the minimum possible value of $\mathcal{R}(\mathcal{F})$, and establish some lower and upper bounds on the function $M(n,r)$, the maximum possible value of $\mathcal{R}(\mathcal{F})$. To obtain constructions that show the bounds on $m(n,r)$ we use a theorem of Blokhuis on the minimum size of a non-trivial blocking set in projective planes.

A family $\cF \subseteq 2^{[n]}$ saturates the monotone decreasing property $\cP$ if $\cF$ satisfies $\cP$ and one cannot add any set to $\cF$ such that property $\cP$ is still satisfied by the resulting family. We address the problem of finding the minimum size of a family saturating the $k$-Sperner property and the minimum size of a family that saturates the Sperner property and that consists only of $l$-sets and $(l+1)$-sets.

A pair of families $(\cF,\cG)$ is said to be \emph{cross-Sperner} if there exists no pair of sets $F \in \cF, G \in \cG$ with $F \subseteq G$ or $G \subseteq F$. There are two ways to measure the size of the pair $(\cF,\cG)$: with the sum $|\cF|+|\cG|$ or with the product $|\cF|\cdot |\cG|$. We show that if $\cF, \cG \subseteq 2^{[n]}$, then $|\cF||\cG| \le 2^{2n-4}$ and $|\cF|+|\cG|$ is maximal if $\cF$ or $\cG$ consists of exactly one set of size $\lceil n/2 \rceil$ provided the size of the ground set $n$ is large enough and both $\cF$ and $\cG$ are non-empty.

For a property $Γ$ and a family of sets $\cF$, let $f(\cF,Γ)$ be the size of the largest subfamily of $\cF$ having property $Γ$. For a positive integer $m$, let $f(m,Γ)$ be the minimum of $f(\cF,Γ)$ over all families of size $m$. A family $\cF$ is said to be $B_d$-free if it has no subfamily $\cF'=\{F_I: I \subseteq [d]\}$ of $2^d$ distinct sets such that for every $I,J \subseteq [d]$, both $F_I \cup F_J=F_{I \cup J}$ and $F_I \cap F_J = F_{I \cap J}$ hold. A family $\cF$ is $a$-union free if $F_1\cup ... F_a \neq F_{a+1}$ whenever $F_1,..,F_{a+1}$ are distinct sets in $\FF$. We verify a conjecture of Erd\H os and Shelah that $f(m, B_2\text{\rm -free})=Θ(m^{2/3})$. We also obtain lower and upper bounds for $f(m, B_d\text{\rm -free})$ and $f(m,a\text{\rm -union free})$.