arXiv++ Combinatorics

Signed graphs have been introduced to enrich graph structures expressing relationships between persons or general social entities, introducing edge signs to reflect the nature of the relationship, e.g., friendship or enmity. Independently, offensive alliances have been defined and studied for undirected, unsigned graphs. We join both lines of research and define offensive alliances in signed graphs, hence considering the nature of relationships. Apart from some combinatorial results, mainly on k-balanced and k-anti-balanced signed graphs (where the latter is a newly introduced family of signed graphs), we focus on the algorithmic complexity of finding smallest offensive alliances, looking at a number of parameterizations. While the parameter solution size leads to an FPT result for unsigned graphs, we obtain W[2]-completeness for the signed setting. We introduce new parameters for signed graphs, e.g., distance to weakly balanced signed graphs, that could be of independent interest. We show that these parameters yield FPT results. Here, we make use of the recently introduced parameter neighborhood diversity for signed graphs.

The idea of enumeration algorithms with polynomial delay is to polynomially bound the running time between any two subsequent solutions output by the enumeration algorithm. While it is open for more than four decades if all minimal dominating sets of a graph can be enumerated in output-polynomial time, it has recently been proven that pointwise-minimal Roman dominating functions can be enumerated even with polynomial delay. The idea of the enumeration algorithm was to use polynomial-time solvable extension problems. We use this as a motivation to prove that also two variants of Roman dominating functions studied in the literature, named perfect and unique response, can be enumerated with polynomial delay. This is interesting since Extension Perfect Roman Domination is W[1]-complete if parameterized by the weight of the given function and even W[2]-complete if parameterized by the number vertices assigned 0 in the pre-solution, as we prove. Otherwise, efficient solvability of extension problems and enumerability with polynomial delay tend to go hand-in-hand. We achieve our enumeration result by constructing a bijection to Roman dominating functions, where the corresponding extension problem is polynomimaltime solvable. Furthermore, we show that Unique Response Roman Domination is solvable in polynomial time on split graphs, while Perfect Roman Domination is NP-complete on this graph class, which proves that both variations, albeit coming with a very similar definition, do differ in some complexity aspects. This way, we also solve an open problem from the literature.

The concept of sum labelling was introduced in 1990 by Harary. A graph is a sum graph if its vertices can be labelled by distinct positive integers in such a way that two vertices are connected by an edge if and only if the sum of their labels is the label of another vertex in the graph. It is easy to see that every sum graph has at least one isolated vertex, and every graph can be made a sum graph by adding at most $n^2$ isolated vertices to it. The minimum number of isolated vertices that need to be added to a graph to make it a sum graph is called the sum number of the graph. The sum number of several prominent graph classes (e.g., cycles, trees, complete graphs) is already well known. We examine the effect of taking the disjoint union of graphs on the sum number. In particular, we provide a complete characterization of the sum number of graphs of maximum degree two, since every such graph is the disjoint union of paths and cycles.

A graph $G$ is well-covered if every minimal vertex cover of $G$ is minimum, and a graph $G$ is well-dominated if every minimal dominating set of $G$ is minimum. Studies on well-covered graphs were initiated in [Plummer, JCT 1970], and well-dominated graphs were first introduced in [Finbow, Hartnell and Nowakow, AC 1988]. Well-dominated graphs are well-covered, and both classes have been widely studied in the literature. The recognition of well-covered graphs was proved coNP-complete by [Chvátal and Slater, AODM 1993] and by [Sankaranarayana and Stewart, Networks 1992], but the complexity of recognizing well-dominated graphs has been left open since their introduction. We close this complexity gap by proving that recognizing well-dominated graphs is coNP-complete. This solves a well-known open question (c.f. [Levit and Tankus, DM 2017] and [Gözüpek, Hujdurovic and Milanič, DMTCS 2017]), which was first asked in [Caro, Sebő and Tarsi, JAlg 1996]. Surprisingly, our proof is quite simple, although it was a long-standing open problem. Finally, we show that recognizing well-totally-dominated graphs is coNP-complete, answering a question of [Bahad\ir, Ekim, and Gözüpek, AMC 2021].

In this paper, we show that several graph parameters are known in different areas under completely different names. More specifically, our observations connect signed domination, monopolies, $α$-domination, $α$-independence, positive influence domination, and a parameter associated to fast information propagation in networks to parameters related to various notions of global $r$-alliances in graphs. We also propose a new framework, called (global) $(D,O)$-alliances, not only in order to characterize various known variants of alliance and domination parameters, but also to suggest a unifying framework for the study of alliances and domination. Finally, we also give a survey on the mentioned graph parameters, indicating how results transfer due to our observations.

The metric dimension is quite a well-studied graph parameter. Recently, the adjacency metric dimension and the local metric dimension have been introduced. We combine these variants and introduce the local adjacency metric dimension. We show that the (local) metric dimension of the corona product of a graph of order $n$ and some non-trivial graph $H$ equals $n$ times the (local) adjacency metric dimension of $H$. This strong relation also enables us to infer computational hardness results for computing the (local) metric dimension, based on according hardness results for (local) adjacency metric dimension that we also provide. We also study combinatorial properties of the strong product of graphs and emphasize the role different types of twins play in determining in particular the adjacency metric dimension of a graph.

Given an ordered partition $Π=\{P_1,P_2, ...,P_t\}$ of the vertex set $V$ of a connected graph $G=(V,E)$, the \emph{partition representation} of a vertex $v\in V$ with respect to the partition $Π$ is the vector $r(v|Π)=(d(v,P_1),d(v,P_2),...,d(v,P_t))$, where $d(v,P_i)$ represents the distance between the vertex $v$ and the set $P_i$. A partition $Π$ of $V$ is a \emph{resolving partition} if different vertices of $G$ have different partition representations, i.e., for every pair of vertices $u,v\in V$, $r(u|Π)\ne r(v|Π)$. The \emph{partition dimension} of $G$ is the minimum number of sets in any resolving partition for $G$. In this paper we obtain several tight bounds on the partition dimension of unicyclic graphs.