arXiv++ Combinatorics

An elimination tree of a connected graph $G$ is a rooted tree on the vertices of $G$ obtained by choosing a root $v$ and recursing on the connected components of $G-v$ to obtain the subtrees of $v$. The graph associahedron of $G$ is a polytope whose vertices correspond to elimination trees of $G$ and whose edges correspond to tree rotations, a natural operation between elimination trees. These objects generalize associahedra, which correspond to the case where $G$ is a path. Ito et al. [ICALP 2023] recently proved that the problem of computing distances on graph associahedra is NP-hard. In this paper we prove that the problem, for a general graph $G$, is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by the distance $k$. Prior to our work, only the case where $G$ is a path was known to be fixed-parameter tractable. To prove our result, we use a novel approach based on a marking scheme that restricts the search to a set of vertices whose size is bounded by a (large) function of $k$.

One way to define the Matching Cut problem is: Given a graph $G$, is there an edge-cut $M$ of $G$ such that $M$ is an independent set in the line graph of $G$? We propose the more general Conflict-Free Cut problem: Together with the graph $G$, we are given a so-called conflict graph $\hat{G}$ on the edges of $G$, and we ask for an edge-cutset $M$ of $G$ that is independent in $\hat{G}$. Since conflict-free settings are popular generalizations of classical optimization problems and Conflict-Free Cut was not considered in the literature so far, we start the study of the problem. We show that the problem is $\textsf{NP}$-complete even when the maximum degree of $G$ is 5 and $\hat{G}$ is 1-regular. The same reduction implies an exponential lower bound on the solvability based on the Exponential Time Hypothesis. We also give parameterized complexity results: We show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable with the vertex cover number of $G$ as a parameter, and we show $\textsf{W[1]}$-hardness even when $G$ has a feedback vertex set of size one, and the clique cover number of $\hat{G}$ is the parameter. Since the clique cover number of $\hat{G}$ is an upper bound on the independence number of $\hat{G}$ and thus the solution size, this implies $\textsf{W[1]}$-hardness when parameterized by the cut size. We list polynomial-time solvable cases and interesting open problems. At last, we draw a connection to a symmetric variant of SAT.

The Independent Cutset problem asks whether there is a set of vertices in a given graph that is both independent and a cutset. Such a problem is $\textsf{NP}$-complete even when the input graph is planar and has maximum degree five. In this paper, we first present a $\mathcal{O}^*(1.4423^{n})$-time algorithm for the problem. We also show how to compute a minimum independent cutset (if any) in the same running time. Since the property of having an independent cutset is MSO$_1$-expressible, our main results are concerned with structural parameterizations for the problem considering parameters that are not bounded by a function of the clique-width of the input. We present $\textsf{FPT}$-time algorithms for the problem considering the following parameters: the dual of the maximum degree, the dual of the solution size, the size of a dominating set (where a dominating set is given as an additional input), the size of an odd cycle transversal, the distance to chordal graphs, and the distance to $P_5$-free graphs. We close by introducing the notion of $α$-domination, which allows us to identify more fixed-parameter tractable and polynomial-time solvable cases.

We show that every graph $G$ of maximum degree $Δ$ and sufficiently large order has a vertex cutset $S$ of order at most $Δ$ that induces a subgraph $G[S]$ of maximum degree at most $Δ-3$. For $Δ\in \{ 4,5\}$, we refine this result by considering also the average degree of $G[S]$. If $G$ has no $K_{r,r}$ subgraph, then we show the existence of a vertex cutset that induces a subgraph of maximum degree at most $\left(1-\frac{1}{r\choose 2}\right)Δ+O(1)$.

In 2021, Duarte, Oliveira, and Souza [MFCS 2021] showed some problems that are FPT when parameterized by the treewidth of the complement graph (called co-treewidth). Since the degeneracy of a graph is at most its treewidth, they also introduced the study of co-degeneracy (the degeneracy of the complement graph) as a parameter. In 1976, Bondy and Chvátal [DM 1976] introduced the notion of closure of a graph: let $\ell$ be an integer; the $(n+\ell)$-closure, $\operatorname{cl}_{n+\ell}(G)$, of a graph $G$ with $n$ vertices is obtained from $G$ by recursively adding an edge between pairs of nonadjacent vertices whose degree sum is at least $n+\ell$ until no such pair remains. A graph property $Υ$ defined on all graphs of order $n$ is said to be $(n+\ell)$-stable if for any graph $G$ of order $n$ that does not satisfy $Υ$, the fact that $uv$ is not an edge of $G$ and that $G+uv$ satisfies $Υ$ implies $d(u)+d(v)< n+\ell$. Duarte et al. [MFCS 2021] developed an algorithmic framework for co-degeneracy parameterization based on the notion of closures for solving problems that are $(n+\ell)$-stable for some $\ell$ bounded by a function of the co-degeneracy. In this paper, we first determine the stability of the property of having a bounded cycle cover. After that, combining the framework of Duarte et al. [MFCS 2021] with some results of Jansen, Kozma, and Nederlof [WG 2019], we obtain a $2^{\mathcal{O}(k)}\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$-time algorithm for Minimum Cycle Cover on graphs with co-degeneracy at most $k$, which generalizes Duarte et al. [MFCS 2021] and Jansen et al. [WG 2019] results concerning the Hamiltonian Cycle problem.

In Partition Into Complementary Subgraphs (Comp-Sub) we are given a graph $G=(V,E)$, and an edge set property $Π$, and asked whether $G$ can be decomposed into two graphs, $H$ and its complement $\overline{H}$, for some graph $H$, in such a way that the edge cut $[V(H),V(\overline{H})]$ satisfies the property $Π$. Motivated by previous work, we consider Comp-Sub($Π$) when the property $Π=\mathcal{PM}$ specifies that the edge cut of the decomposition is a perfect matching. We prove that Comp-Sub($\mathcal{PM}$) is GI-hard when the graph $G$ is $\{C_{k\geq 7}, \overline{C}_{k\geq 7} \}$-free. On the other hand, we show that Comp-Sub($\mathcal{PM}$) is polynomial-time solvable on $hole$-free graphs and on $P_5$-free graphs. Furthermore, we present characterizations of Comp-Sub($\mathcal{PM}$) on chordal, distance-hereditary, and extended $P_4$-laden graphs.

An oriented graph is a digraph that does not contain a directed cycle of length two. An (oriented) graph $D$ is $H$-free if $D$ does not contain $H$ as an induced sub(di)graph. The Gyárfás-Sumner conjecture is a widely-open conjecture on simple graphs, which states that for any forest $F$, there is some function $f$ such that every $F$-free graph $G$ with clique number $ω(G)$ has chromatic number at most $f(ω(G))$. Aboulker, Charbit, and Naserasr [Extension of Gyárfás-Sumner Conjecture to Digraphs; E-JC 2021] proposed an analogue of this conjecture to the dichromatic number of oriented graphs. The dichromatic number of a digraph $D$ is the minimum number of colors required to color the vertex set of $D$ so that no directed cycle in $D$ is monochromatic. Aboulker, Charbit, and Naserasr's $\overrightarrowχ$-boundedness conjecture states that for every oriented forest $F$, there is some function $f$ such that every $F$-free oriented graph $D$ has dichromatic number at most $f(ω(D))$, where $ω(D)$ is the size of a maximum clique in the graph underlying $D$. In this paper, we perform the first step towards proving Aboulker, Charbit, and Naserasr's $\overrightarrowχ$-boundedness conjecture by showing that it holds when $F$ is any orientation of a path on four vertices.

A graph $G$ is well-covered if every minimal vertex cover of $G$ is minimum, and a graph $G$ is well-dominated if every minimal dominating set of $G$ is minimum. Studies on well-covered graphs were initiated in [Plummer, JCT 1970], and well-dominated graphs were first introduced in [Finbow, Hartnell and Nowakow, AC 1988]. Well-dominated graphs are well-covered, and both classes have been widely studied in the literature. The recognition of well-covered graphs was proved coNP-complete by [Chvátal and Slater, AODM 1993] and by [Sankaranarayana and Stewart, Networks 1992], but the complexity of recognizing well-dominated graphs has been left open since their introduction. We close this complexity gap by proving that recognizing well-dominated graphs is coNP-complete. This solves a well-known open question (c.f. [Levit and Tankus, DM 2017] and [Gözüpek, Hujdurovic and Milanič, DMTCS 2017]), which was first asked in [Caro, Sebő and Tarsi, JAlg 1996]. Surprisingly, our proof is quite simple, although it was a long-standing open problem. Finally, we show that recognizing well-totally-dominated graphs is coNP-complete, answering a question of [Bahad\ir, Ekim, and Gözüpek, AMC 2021].

We confirm a conjecture of Gartland and Lokshtanov [arXiv:2007.08761]: if for a hereditary graph class $\mathcal{G}$ there exists a constant $k$ such that no member of $\mathcal{G}$ contains a $k$-creature as an induced subgraph or a $k$-skinny-ladder as an induced minor, then there exists a polynomial $p$ such that every $G \in \mathcal{G}$ contains at most $p(|V(G)|)$ minimal separators. By a result of Fomin, Todinca, and Villanger [SIAM J. Comput. 2015] the latter entails the existence of polynomial-time algorithms for Maximum Weight Independent Set, Feedback Vertex Set and many other problems, when restricted to an input graph from $\mathcal{G}$. Furthermore, as shown by Gartland and Lokshtanov, our result implies a full dichotomy of hereditary graph classes defined by a finite set of forbidden induced subgraphs into tame (admitting a polynomial bound of the number of minimal separators) and feral (containing infinitely many graphs with exponential number of minimal separators).

The CONTRACTION(vc) problem takes as input a graph $G$ on $n$ vertices and two integers $k$ and $d$, and asks whether one can contract at most $k$ edges to reduce the size of a minimum vertex cover of $G$ by at least $d$. Recently, Lima et al. [JCSS 2021] proved, among other results, that unlike most of the so-called blocker problems, CONTRACTION(vc) admits an XP algorithm running in time $f(d) \cdot n^{O(d)}$. They left open the question of whether this problem is FPT under this parameterization. In this article, we continue this line of research and prove the following results: 1. CONTRACTION(vc) is W[1]-hard parameterized by $k + d$. Moreover, unless the ETH fails, the problem does not admit an algorithm running in time $f(k + d) \cdot n^{o(k + d)}$ for any function $f$. In particular, this answers the open question stated in Lima et al. [JCSS 2021] in the negative. 2. It is NP-hard to decide whether an instance $(G, k, d)$ of CONTRACTION(vc) is a yes-instance even when $k = d$, hence enhancing our understanding of the classical complexity of the problem. 3. CONTRACTION(vc) can be solved in time $2^{O(d)} \cdot n^{k - d + O(1)}$. This XP algorithm improves the one of Lima et al. [JCSS 2021], which uses Courcelle's theorem as a subroutine and hence, the $f(d)$-factor in the running time is non-explicit and probably very large. On the other hard, it shows that when $k=d$, the problem is FPT parameterized by $d$ (or by $k$).

For a graph invariant $π$, the Contraction($π$) problem consists in, given a graph $G$ and two positive integers $k,d$, deciding whether one can contract at most $k$ edges of $G$ to obtain a graph in which $π$ has dropped by at least $d$. Galby et al. [ISAAC 2019, MFCS 2019] recently studied the case where $π$ is the size of a minimum dominating set. We focus on graph invariants defined as the minimum size of a vertex set that hits all the occurrences of graphs in a collection ${\cal H}$ according to a fixed containment relation. We prove co-NP-hardness results under some assumptions on the graphs in ${\cal H}$, which in particular imply that Contraction($π$) is co-NP-hard even for fixed $k=d=1$ when $π$ is the size of a minimum feedback vertex set or an odd cycle transversal. In sharp contrast, we show that when $π$ is the size of a minimum vertex cover, the problem is in XP parameterized by $d$.

For a fixed graph $H$, the $H$-IS-Deletion problem asks, given a graph $G$, for the minimum size of a set $S \subseteq V(G)$ such that $G\setminus S$ does not contain $H$ as an induced subgraph. Motivated by previous work about hitting (topological) minors and subgraphs on bounded treewidth graphs, we are interested in determining, for a fixed graph $H$, the smallest function $f_H(t)$ such that $H$-IS-Deletion can be solved in time $f_H(t) \cdot n^{O(1)}$ assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), where $t$ and $n$ denote the treewidth and the number of vertices of the input graph, respectively. We show that $f_H(t) = 2^{O(t^{h-2})}$ for every graph $H$ on $h \geq 3$ vertices, and that $f_H(t) = 2^{O(t)}$ if $H$ is a clique or an independent set. We present a number of lower bounds by generalizing a reduction of Cygan et al. [MFCS 2014] for the subgraph version. In particular, we show that when $H$ deviates slightly from a clique, the function $f_H(t)$ suffers a sharp jump: if $H$ is obtained from a clique of size $h$ by removing one edge, then $f_H(t) = 2^{Θ(t^{h-2})}$. We also show that $f_H(t) = 2^{Ω(t^{h})}$ when $H=K_{h,h}$, and this reduction answers an open question of Mi. Pilipczuk [MFCS 2011] about the function $f_{C_4}(t)$ for the subgraph version. Motivated by Cygan et al. [MFCS 2014], we also consider the colorful variant of the problem, where each vertex of $G$ is colored with some color from $V(H)$ and we require to hit only induced copies of $H$ with matching colors. In this case, we determine, under the ETH, the function $f_H(t)$ for every connected graph $H$ on $h$ vertices: if $h\leq 2$ the problem can be solved in polynomial time; if $h\geq 3$, $f_H(t) = 2^{Θ(t)}$ if $H$ is a clique, and $f_H(t) = 2^{Θ(t^{h-2})}$ otherwise.

The input of the Maximum Colored Cut problem consists of a graph $G=(V,E)$ with an edge-coloring $c:E\to \{1,2,3,\ldots , p\}$ and a positive integer $k$, and the question is whether $G$ has a nontrivial edge cut using at least $k$ colors. The Colorful Cut problem has the same input but asks for a nontrivial edge cut using all $p$ colors. Unlike what happens for the classical Maximum Cut problem, we prove that both problems are NP-complete even on complete, planar, or bounded treewidth graphs. Furthermore, we prove that Colorful Cut is NP-complete even when each color class induces a clique of size at most 3, but is trivially solvable when each color induces a $K_2$. On the positive side, we prove that Maximum Colored Cut is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by either $k$ or $p$, by constructing a cubic kernel in both cases.