arXiv++ Combinatorics

Although there is a somewhat standard formalization of computability on countable sets given by Turing machines, the same cannot be said about uncountable sets. Among the approaches to define computability in these sets, order-theoretic structures have proven to be useful. Here, we discuss the mathematical structure needed to define computability using order-theoretic concepts. In particular, we introduce a more general framework and discuss its limitations compared to the previous one in domain theory. We expose four features in which the stronger requirements in the domain-theoretic structure allow to improve upon the more general framework: computable elements, computable functions, model dependence of computability and complexity theory. Crucially, we show computability of elements in uncountable spaces can be defined in this new setup, and argue why this is not the case for computable functions. Moreover, we show the stronger setup diminishes the dependence of computability on the chosen order-theoretic structure and that, although a suitable complexity theory can be defined in the stronger framework and the more general one posesses a notion of computable elements, there appears to be no proper notion of element complexity in the latter.

Partial orders have been used to model several experimental setups, going from classical thermodynamics and general relativity to the quantum realm with its resource theories. In order to study such experimental setups, one typically characterizes them via a (numerical) representation, that is, a set of real-valued functions. In the context of resource theory, it is customary to use \textbf{mathematical} representations, i.e. a set of \textbf{measurement outcomes} which characterize the achievable transitions within the experimental setup. However, in line with the minimum energy and maximum entropy principles in classical mechanics and thermodynamics, respectively, one would expect an optimization interpretation for a representation to be called \textbf{physical}. More specifically, a physical representation could consist of a set of competing \textbf{optimization principles} such that a transition happens provided they are all optimized by it. Somewhat surprisingly, we show that this distinction can result in an \textbf{infinite information gap}, with some partial orders having mathematical representations that involve a finite amount of information and requiring infinite information to build a physical representation. We connect this phenomenon with well-known resource-theoretic scenarios like majorization, and develop notions of partial order dimension that run in parallel to the representations that we consider. Our results improve on the classification of preordered spaces in terms of real-valued functions.

The study of complexity and optimization in decision theory involves both partial and complete characterizations of preferences over decision spaces in terms of real-valued monotones. With this motivation, and following the recent introduction of new classes of monotones, like injective monotones or strict monotone multi-utilities, we present the classification of preordered spaces in terms of both the existence and cardinality of real-valued monotones and the cardinality of the quotient space. In particular, we take advantage of a characterization of real-valued monotones in terms of separating families of increasing sets in order to obtain a more complete classification consisting of classes that are strictly different from each other. As a result, we gain new insight into both complexity and optimization, and clarify their interplay in preordered spaces.