arXiv++ Combinatorics

A classical theorem due to Friedgut, Kalai and Naor asserts that if a function $f\colon \{0,1\}^n\to\{-1,1\}$ close to a degree $1$ function, then either $f$ or $-f$ is close to either the all $1$ function, or to $(-1)^{x_i}$ for some $i\in [n]$. We prove a version of their theorem for the Grassmann scheme over $\mathbb{F}_2$. More precisely, we prove if a function $f\colon \genfrac{[}{]}{0pt}{}{\mathbb{F}_2^n}{\ell}\to\{0,1\}$ is close to a degree $1$ function, then either $f$ or $1-f$ must be close to a function of the form $g(L) = \sum_{x\in\mathcal{X}}1_{x\in L}+\sum_{W\in\mathcal{W}}1_{L\subseteq W}$, where $\mathcal{X}\subseteq\mathbb{F}_2^n$ is a set of points and $\mathcal{W}$ is a set of hyperplanes in $\mathbb{F}_2^n$.

Given two $m$-ary predicates $P,Q$, an $n$-ary polymorphism is a tuple $(f_1,\dots,f_m)$ of functions such that $x^{(1)},\dots,x^{(n)} \in P$ implies $(f_1(y_1),\dots,f_m(y_m)) \in Q$, where $y_i = (x^{(1)}_i,\dots,x^{(m)}_i)$. This generalizes the usual definition in universal algebra, in which $P = Q$ and $f_1 = \cdots = f_m$. In earlier work, we studied when all polymorphisms of a single predicate are "trivial": either all depend on a single coordinate (common to all of them), or they constitute a "certificate" for the predicate. We showed that it suffices to check this condition for $2$-ary polymorphisms, and even for $1$-ary polymorphisms, modulo an explicit list of obstructions. In this paper we generalize the first result to the $P,Q$ setting, for a relaxed notion of certificate. We also generalize the second result in the promise setting, in which $P,Q$ range over the same alphabets and $P \subseteq Q$.

Ferdinand Ihringer proved that Boolean degree one functions on the Grassmann scheme $J_q(n,k)$ are trivial when $\min(k,n-k) \ge 2$ and $n$ is large enough. We provide a mostly self-contained exposition of this result.

A group of individuals wishes to classify $m$ objects into $n$ categories in such a way that no class is left empty, a condition known as surjectivity. The opinions of the individuals are aggregated separately for each object using an aggregation function that can depend on the object. Maniquet and Mongin showed that if the aggregation functions are unanimous and the outcome must always be surjective, then the aggregation mechanism is dictatorial. Cailloux et al. showed that the same holds even if unanimity is relaxed to citizen sovereignty (each object can be classified into any category). We show that similar results hold even if we only require the outcome to be surjective with probability $1-ε$ (with respect to an arbitrary symmetric i.i.d. distribution), provided that the aggregation functions are far from being constant. On the way, we characterize all aggregation mechanisms whose outcome is always surjective without any assumptions on the aggregation functions. Our approach uses a general result of Alekseev and Filmus which has wider applicability. We illustrate this by proving a similar impossibility result for aggregating equivalence relations.

A generalized polymorphism of a predicate $P \subseteq \{0,1\}^m$ is a tuple of functions $f_1,\dots,f_m\colon \{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}$ satisfying the following property: If $x^{(1)},\dots,x^{(m)} \in \{0,1\}^n$ are such that $(x^{(1)}_i,\dots,x^{(m)}_i) \in P$ for all $i$, then also $(f_1(x^{(1)}),\dots,f_m(x^{(m)})) \in P$. We show that if $f_1,\dots,f_m$ satisfy this property for most $x^{(1)},\dots,x^{(m)}$ (as measured with respect to an arbitrary full support distribution $μ$ on $P$), then $f_1,\dots,f_m$ are close to a generalized polymorphism of $P$ (with respect to the marginals of $μ$). Our main result generalizes several results in the literature: linearity testing, quantitative Arrow theorems, approximate intersecting families, AND testing, and more generally $f$-testing.

For any $m\geq 3$ we show that the Hamming graph $H(n,m)$ admits an imbalanced partition into $m$ sets, each inducing a subgraph of low maximum degree. This improves previous results by Tandya and by Potechin and Tsang, and disproves the Strong $m$-ary Sensitivity Conjecture of Asensio, García-Marco, and Knauer. On the other hand, we prove their weaker $m$-ary Sensitivity Conjecture by showing that the sensitivity of any $m$-ary function is bounded from below by a polynomial expression in its degree.

Dokow and Holzman determined which predicates over $\{0, 1\}$ satisfy an analog of Arrow's theorem: all unanimous aggregators are dictatorial. Szegedy and Xu, extending earlier work of Dokow and Holzman, extended this to predicates over arbitrary finite alphabets. Mossel extended Arrow's theorem in an orthogonal direction, determining all aggregators without the assumption of unanimity. We bring together both threads of research by extending the results of Dokow-Holzman and Szegedy-Xu to the setting of Mossel. As an application, we determine, for each symmetric predicate over $\{0,1\}$, all of its aggregators.

An integer sequence $(a_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ is \emph{MC-finite} if for all $m$, the sequence $a_n \bmod m$ is eventually periodic. There are MC-finite sequences $(a_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$ such that the function $F: (m,n) \mapsto a_n \bmod m$ is not computable. In \cite{filmus2023mc} we presented concrete examples of MC-finite sequences taken from the Online Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (OEIS) without discussing the computability of $F$. In this paper we discuss cases when this $F$ is effectively computable.

In a recent breakthrough, Kelley and Meka (FOCS 2023) obtained a strong upper bound on the density of sets of integers without nontrivial three-term arithmetic progressions. In this work, we extend their result, establishing similar bounds for all linear patterns defined by binary systems of linear forms, where "binary" indicates that every linear form depends on exactly two variables. Prior to our work, no strong bounds were known for such systems even in the finite field model setting. A key ingredient in our proof is a graph counting lemma. The classical graph counting lemma, developed by Thomason (Random Graphs 1985) and Chung, Graham, and Wilson (Combinatorica 1989), is a fundamental tool in combinatorics. For a fixed graph $H$, it states that the number of copies of $H$ in a pseudorandom graph $G$ is similar to the number of copies of $H$ in a purely random graph with the same edge density as $G$. However, this lemma is only non-trivial when $G$ is a dense graph. In this work, we prove a graph counting lemma that is also effective when $G$ is sparse. Moreover, our lemma is well-suited for density increment arguments in additive number theory. As an immediate application, we obtain a strong bound for the Turán problem in abelian Cayley sum graphs: let $Γ$ be a finite abelian group with odd order. If a Cayley sum graph on $Γ$ does not contain any $r$-clique as a subgraph, it must have at most $2^{-Ω_r(\log^{1/16}|Γ|)}\cdot |Γ|^2$ edges. These results hinge on the technology developed by Kelley and Meka and the follow-up work by Kelley, Lovett, and Meka (STOC 2024).

We find all functions $f_0,f_1,\dots,f_m\colon \{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}$ and $g_0,g_1,\dots,g_n\colon \{0,1\}^m \to \{0,1\}$ satisfying the following identity for all $n \times m$ matrices $(z_{ij}) \in \{0,1\}^{n \times m}$: \[ f_0(g_1(z_{11},\dots,z_{1m}),\dots,g_n(z_{n1},\dots,z_{nm})) = g_0(f_1(z_{11},\dots,z_{n1}),\dots,f_m(z_{1m},\dots,z_{nm})). \] Our results generalize work of Dokow and Holzman (2010), which considered the case $g_0 = g_1 = \cdots = g_n$, and of Chase, Filmus, Minzer, Mossel and Saurabh (2022), which considered the case $g_0 \neq g_1 = \cdots = g_n$.

A sequence $s(n)$ of integers is MC-finite if for every $m \in \mathbb{N}^+$ the sequence $s^m(n) = s(n) \bmod{m}$ is ultimately periodic. We discuss various ways of proving and disproving MC-finiteness. Our examples are mostly taken from set partition functions, but our methods can be applied to many more integer sequences.

A \emph{subcube partition} is a partition of the Boolean cube $\{0,1\}^n$ into subcubes. A subcube partition is irreducible if the only sub-partitions whose union is a subcube are singletons and the entire partition. A subcube partition is tight if it "mentions" all coordinates. We study extremal properties of tight irreducible subcube partitions: minimal size, minimal weight, maximal number of points, maximal size, and maximal minimum dimension. We also consider the existence of homogeneous tight irreducible subcube partitions, in which all subcubes have the same dimensions. We additionally study subcube partitions of $\{0,\dots,q-1\}^n$, and partitions of $\mathbb{F}_2^n$ into affine subspaces, in both cases focusing on the minimal size. Our constructions and computer experiments lead to several conjectures on the extremal values of the aforementioned properties.

An affine vector space partition of $\operatorname{AG}(n,q)$ is a set of proper affine subspaces that partitions the set of points. Here we determine minimum sizes and enumerate equivalence classes of affine vector space partitions for small parameters. We also give parametric constructions for arbitrary field sizes.

We give a characterization of the largest $2$-intersecting families of permutations of $\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$ and of perfect matchings of the complete graph $K_{2n}$ for all $n \geq 2$.

We show that a Boolean degree $d$ function on the slice $\binom{[n]}{k}$ is a junta if $k \geq 2d$, and that this bound is sharp. We prove a similar result for $A$-valued degree $d$ functions for arbitrary finite $A$, and for functions on an infinite analog of the slice.

We give simpler algebraic proofs of uniqueness for several Erdős-Ko-Rado results, i.e., that the canonically intersecting families are the only largest intersecting families. Using these techniques, we characterize the largest partially 2-intersecting families of perfect hypermatchings, resolving a recent conjecture of Meagher, Shirazi, and Stevens.

We show that if $f\colon S_n \to \{0,1\}$ is $ε$-close to linear in $L_2$ and $\mathbb{E}[f] \leq 1/2$ then $f$ is $O(ε)$-close to a union of "mostly disjoint" cosets, and moreover this is sharp: any such union is close to linear. This constitutes a sharp Friedgut-Kalai-Naor theorem for the symmetric group. Using similar techniques, we show that if $f\colon S_n \to \mathbb{R}$ is linear, $\Pr[f \notin \{0,1\}] \leq ε$, and $\Pr[f = 1] \leq 1/2$, then $f$ is $O(ε)$-close to a union of mostly disjoint cosets, and this is also sharp; and that if $f\colon S_n \to \mathbb{R}$ is linear and $ε$-close to $\{0,1\}$ in $L_\infty$ then $f$ is $O(ε)$-close in $L_\infty$ to a union of disjoint cosets.

In the distributional Twenty Questions game, Bob chooses a number $x$ from $1$ to $n$ according to a distribution $μ$, and Alice (who knows $μ$) attempts to identify $x$ using Yes/No questions, which Bob answers truthfully. Her goal is to minimize the expected number of questions. The optimal strategy for the Twenty Questions game corresponds to a Huffman code for $μ$, yet this strategy could potentially uses all $2^n$ possible questions. Dagan et al. constructed a set of $1.25^{n+o(n)}$ questions which suffice to construct an optimal strategy for all $μ$, and showed that this number is optimal (up to sub-exponential factors) for infinitely many $n$. We determine the optimal size of such a set of questions for all $n$ (up to sub-exponential factors), answering an open question of Dagan et al. In addition, we generalize the results of Dagan et al. to the $d$-ary setting, obtaining similar results with $1.25$ replaced by $1 + (d-1)/d^{d/(d-1)}$.

For a function $g\colon\{0,1\}^m\to\{0,1\}$, a function $f\colon \{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}$ is called a $g$-polymorphism if their actions commute: $f(g(\mathsf{row}_1(Z)),\ldots,g(\mathsf{row}_n(Z))) = g(f(\mathsf{col}_1(Z)),\ldots,f(\mathsf{col}_m(Z)))$ for all $Z\in\{0,1\}^{n\times m}$. The function $f$ is called an approximate polymorphism if this equality holds with probability close to $1$, when $Z$ is sampled uniformly. We study the structure of exact polymorphisms as well as approximate polymorphisms. Our results include: - We prove that an approximate polymorphism $f$ must be close to an exact polymorphism; - We give a characterization of exact polymorphisms, showing that besides trivial cases, only the functions $g = \mathsf{AND}, \mathsf{XOR}, \mathsf{OR}, \mathsf{NXOR}$ admit non-trivial exact polymorphisms. We also study the approximate polymorphism problem in the list-decoding regime (i.e., when the probability equality holds is not close to $1$, but is bounded away from some value). We show that if $f(x \land y) = f(x) \land f(y)$ with probability larger than $s_\land \approx 0.815$ then $f$ correlates with some low-degree character, and $s_\land$ is the optimal threshold for this property. Our result generalize the classical linearity testing result of Blum, Luby and Rubinfeld, that in this language showed that the approximate polymorphisms of $g = \mathsf{XOR}$ are close to XOR's, as well as a recent result of Filmus, Lifshitz, Minzer and Mossel, showing that the approximate polymorphisms of AND can only be close to AND functions.

We extend the definitions of complexity measures of functions to domains such as the symmetric group. The complexity measures we consider include degree, approximate degree, decision tree complexity, sensitivity, block sensitivity, and a few others. We show that these complexity measures are polynomially related for the symmetric group and for many other domains. To show that all measures but sensitivity are polynomially related, we generalize classical arguments of Nisan and others. To add sensitivity to the mix, we reduce to Huang's sensitivity theorem using "pseudo-characters", which witness the degree of a function. Using similar ideas, we extend the characterization of Boolean degree 1 functions on the symmetric group due to Ellis, Friedgut and Pilpel to the perfect matching scheme. As another application of our ideas, we simplify the characterization of maximum-size $t$-intersecting families in the symmetric group and the perfect matching scheme.