arXiv++ Combinatorics

A graph $G$ is {\em perfectly divisible} if, for each induced subgraph $H$ of $G$, $V(H)$ can be partitioned into $A$ and $B$ such that $H[A]$ is perfect and $ω(H[B])<ω(H)$. A {\em bull} is a graph consisting of a triangle with two disjoint pendant edges. Hoàng [Discrete Math. 349 (2026) 114809] proposed four conjectures: 1. $P_5$-free graphs are perfectly divisible; 2. Odd hole-free graphs are perfectly divisible; 3. Even hole-free graphs are perfectly divisible; and 4. $4K_1$-free graphs are perfectly divisible. Karthick et al. [Electron. J. Combin. 29 (2022) P3.19] proposed a conjecture: Fork-free graphs are perfectly divisible. In this paper, we prove that all of five conjectures above hold for bull-free graphs. Our results also generalize some results of Chudnovsky and Sivaraman [J. Graph Theory 90 (2019) 54--60] and Karthick et al. [Electron. J. Combin. 29 (2022) P3.19]. We say that a class ${\cal C}$ is {\em perfect-Pollyanna} if ${\cal C}\cap {\cal G}$ is perfectly divisible for any hereditary class ${\cal G}$ in which each triangle-free graph is 3-colorable. Let $H\in\{\text{house, hammer, diamond}\}$. In this paper, we prove that the class of $(\text{bull}, H)$-free graphs is perfect-Pollyanna. Let ${\cal C}$ be the class of $(\text{bull}, H)$-free graphs. This implies that ${\cal C}\cap {\cal G}$ is perfectly divisible if and only if all of triangle-free graphs in ${\cal G}$ are perfectly divisible. As corollaries, we show that $(\text{bull},{\cal H})$-free graphs are perfectly divisible, where ${\cal H}$ is one of $\{P_{11},C_4\},\{P_{14},C_5,C_4\}$, and $\{P_{17},C_6,C_5,C_4\}$.

A dominating set of a graph $G$ is a set $D \subseteq V(G)$ such that every vertex in $V(G) \setminus D$ is adjacent to at least one vertex in $D$. A set $L\subseteq V(G)$ is a locating set of $G$ if every vertex in $V(G) \setminus L$ has pairwise distinct open neighborhoods in $L$. A set $D\subseteq V(G)$ is a locating-dominating set of $G$ if $D$ is a dominating set and a locating set of $G$. The location-domination number of $G$, denoted by $γ_{LD}(G)$, is the minimum cardinality among all locating-dominating sets of $G$. A well-known conjecture in the study of locating-dominating sets is that if $G$ is an isolate-free and twin-free graph of order $n$, then $γ_{LD}(G)\le \frac{n}{2}$. Recently, Bousquet et al. [Discrete Math. 348 (2025), 114297] proved that if $G$ is an isolate-free and twin-free graph of order $n$, then $γ_{LD}(G)\le \lceil\frac{5n}{8}\rceil$ and posed the question whether the vertex set of such a graph can be partitioned into two locating sets. We answer this question affirmatively for twin-free distance-hereditary graphs, maximal outerplanar graphs, split graphs, and co-bipartite graphs. In fact, we prove a stronger result that for any graph $G$ without isolated vertices and twin vertices, if $G$ is a distance-hereditary graph or a maximal outerplanar graph or a split graph or a co-bipartite graph, then the vertex set of $G$ can be partitioned into two locating-dominating sets. Consequently, this also confirms the original conjecture for these graph classes.

The game of cops and robber is a two-player turn-based game played on a graph where the cops try to capture the robber. The cop number of a graph $G$, denoted by $c(G)$ is the minimum number of cops required to capture the robber. For a given class of graphs ${\cal F}$, let $c({\cal F}):=\sup\{c(F)|F\in {\cal F}\}$, and let Forb$({\cal F})$ denote the class of ${\cal F}$-free graphs. We show that the complement of the Shrikhande graph is $(4K_1,C_{\ell}$)-free for any $\ell \geq 6$ and has the cop number~$3$. This provides a counterexample for the conjecture proposed by Sivaraman (arxiv, 2019) which states that if $G$ is $C_{\ell}$-free for all $\ell\ge 6$, then $c(G)\le 2$. This also gives a negative answer to the question posed by Turcotte (Discrete Math. 345:112660 (2022)) 112660. to check whether $c($Forb$(pK_1))=p-2$. Turcotte also posed the question to check whether $c($Forb$(pK_1+K_2))\leq p+1$, for $p\geq 3$. We prove that this result indeed holds. We also generalize this result for Forb$(pK_1+qK_2)$. Motivated by the results of Baird et al. (Contrib. Discrete Math. 9:70--84 (2014)) and Turcotte and Yvon (Discrete Appl. Math. 301:74--98 (2021)), we define the upper threshold degree and lower threshold degree for a particular class of graphs and show some computational advantage to find the cop number using these.

A disjunctive dominating set of a graph $G$ is a set $D \subseteq V(G)$ such that every vertex in $V(G)\setminus D$ has a neighbor in $D$ or has at least two vertices in $D$ at distance $2$ from it. The disjunctive domination number of $G$, denoted by $γ_2^d(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a disjunctive dominating set of $G$. In this paper, we show that if $G$ is a maximal outerplanar graph of order $n \ge 7$ with $k$ vertices of degree $2$, then $γ_2^d(G)\le \lfloor\frac{2}{9}(n+k)\rfloor$, and this bound is sharp.

A dominating set of a graph $G$ is a set $S \subseteq V(G)$ such that every vertex in $V(G) \setminus S$ has a neighbor in $S$, where two vertices are neighbors if they are adjacent. A secure dominating set of $G$ is a dominating set $S$ of $G$ with the additional property that for every vertex $v \in V(G) \setminus S$, there exists a neighbor $u$ of $v$ in $S$ such that $(S \setminus \{u\}) \cup \{v\}$ is a dominating set of $G$. The secure domination number of $G$, denoted by $γ_s(G)$, is the minimum cardinality of a secure dominating set of $G$. We prove that if $G$ is a $P_5$-free graph, then $γ_s(G) \le \frac{3}{2}α(G)$, where $α(G)$ denotes the independence number of $G$. We further show that if $G$ is a connected $(P_5, H)$-free graph for some $H \in \{ P_3 \cup P_1, K_2 \cup 2K_1, ~\text{paw},~ C_4\}$, then $γ_s(G)\le \max\{3,α(G)\}$. We also show that if $G$ is a $(P_3 \cup P_2)$-free graph, then $γ_s(G)\le α(G)+1$.