arXiv++ Combinatorics

A hole is an induced cycle of length at least 4, and an odd hole is a hole of odd length. It is NP-hard to color the vertices of an odd hole-free graph. A graph $G$ is perfectly divisible if every induced subgraph $H$ of $G$ with at least one edge admits a partition of $V(H)$ into sets $A$ and $B$ such that $H[A]$ is perfect and $ω(H[B])<ω(H)$. $G$ is short-holed if every hole in $G$ has length 4. A hammer is the graph obtained by identifying one vertex of a $K_3$ and one end vertex of a $P_3$. In this paper, we prove that (i) (odd hole, hammer, $K_{2,3}$)-free graphs are perfectly divisible, (ii) $χ(G)\le 4ω(G)(ω(G)-1)$ if $G$ is short-holed and $(K_1+C_4)$-free, (iii) $χ(G)\le 2ω(G)-1$ if $G$ is short-holed and $(K_1\cup K_3)$-free, and (iv) $χ(G)\le 16ω(G)-24$ if $G$ is short-holed and $(K_1+(K_1\cup K_3))$-free.

A directed phylogenetic network is tree-child if every non-leaf vertex has a child that is not a reticulation. As a class of directed phylogenetic networks, tree-child networks are very useful from a computational perspective. For example, several computationally difficult problems in phylogenetics become tractable when restricted to tree-child networks. At the same time, the class itself is rich enough to contain quite complex networks. Furthermore, checking whether a directed network is tree-child can be done in polynomial time. In this paper, we seek a class of undirected phylogenetic networks that is rich and computationally useful in a similar way to the class tree-child directed networks. A natural class to consider for this role is the class of tree-child-orientable networks which contains all those undirected phylogenetic networks whose edges can be oriented to create a tree-child network. However, we show here that recognizing such networks is NP-hard, even for binary networks, and as such this class is inappropriate for this role. Towards finding a class of undirected networks that fills a similar role to directed tree-child networks, we propose new classes called $q$-cuttable networks, for any integer $q\geq 1$. We show that these classes have many of the desirable properties, similar to tree-child networks in the rooted case, including being recognizable in polynomial time, for all $q\geq 1$. Towards showing the computational usefulness of the class, we show that the NP-hard problem Tree Containment is polynomial-time solvable when restricted to $q$-cuttable networks with $q\geq 3$.

We prove that computing a shortest monotone path to the optimum of a linear program over a simple polytope is NP-hard, thus resolving a 2022 open question of De Loera, Kafer, and Sanità. As a consequence, finding a shortest sequence of pivots to an optimal basis with the simplex method is NP-hard. In fact, we show this is NP-hard already for fractional knapsack polytopes. By applying an additional polyhedral construction, we show that computing the diameter of a simple polytope is NP-hard, resolving a 2003 open problem by Kaibel and Pfetsch. Finally, on the positive side we show that every polytope has a small, simple extended formulation for which a linear length path may be found between any pair of vertices in polynomial time building upon a result of Kaibel and Kukharenko.

We introduce the \emph{antisymmetric line graph} $\mathcal{A}(G)$, a canonical signed refinement of the line graph defined on the oriented edges of a graph $G$ via an antisymmetric incidence rule. We show that $\mathcal{A}(G)$ is balanced if and only if $G$ is bipartite, so the frustration index $\ell(\mathcal{A}(G))$ defines a switching-invariant measure of non-bipartiteness. The switching class of $\mathcal{A}(G)$ determines $G$ up to isomorphism modulo isolated vertices, thereby resolving Whitney's exceptional ambiguity. We obtain quantitative bounds relating $\ell(\mathcal{A}(G))$ to classical measures of non-bipartiteness; in particular, \[ \operatorname{def}(G)\le \ell(\mathcal{A}(G))\le (Δ(G)-1)\operatorname{def}(G), \] where $\operatorname{def}(G)$ is the minimum number of edges whose deletion makes $G$ bipartite. Our strongest result is an exact identification in the cubic case: for every cubic graph $G$, with $\operatorname{oct}(G)$ denoting the odd cycle transversal number, \[ \ell(\mathcal{A}(G)) = 2\operatorname{oct}(G). \] Hence on cubic graphs a canonical signed line-graph invariant recovers a central bipartization parameter, and computing $\ell(\mathcal{A}(G))$ is NP-hard even for cubic inputs.

In this paper, connections between independent sets and the variety of mutual-visibility sets are studied. It is proved that every outer mutual-visibility set of a graph is independent if and only if the graph is distance edge-critical. Several constructions yielding distance edge-critical graphs are given. Graphs in which every independent set is a total mutual-visibility or a dual mutual-visibility set are characterized, as well as graphs in which every total mutual-visibility set is independent. Along the way the total mutual-visibility number of some graphs derived from fullerenes is determined. Graphs in which every independent set is a mutual-visibility set are discussed and characterized over diameter four graphs. It is proved that determining the maximum cardinality of an independent mutual-visibility set and deciding whether it equals the independence number of a graph are NP-hard problems, and the same is true for independent total, outer and dual mutual-visibility sets.

Flips in triangulations of convex polygons arise in many different settings. They are isomorphic to rotations in binary trees, define edges in the 1-skeleton of the Associahedron and cover relations in the Tamari Lattice. The complexity of determining the minimum number of flips that transform one triangulation of a convex point set into another remained a tantalizing open question for many decades. We settle this question by proving that computing shortest flip sequences between triangulations of convex polygons, and therefore also computing the rotation distance of binary trees, is NP-hard. For our proof we develop techniques for flip sequences of triangulations whose counterparts were introduced for the study of flip sequences of non-crossing spanning trees by Bjerkevik, Kleist, Ueckerdt, and Vogtenhuber~[SODA25] and Bjerkevik, Dorfer, Kleist, Ueckerdt, and Vogtenhuber~[SoCG26].

In this paper, we develop a time-series-based signed network model for dimensionality reduction in portfolio optimization, grounded in Markowitz's portfolio theory and extended to incorporate higher-order moments of asset return distributions. Unlike traditional correlation-based approaches, we construct a complete signed graph for each trading day within a specified time window, where the sign of an edge between a pair of assets is determined by the relative behavior of their log returns with respect to their mean returns. Within this framework, we introduce a combinatorial interpretation of higher-order moments, showing that maximizing skewness and minimizing kurtosis correspond to maximizing balanced triangles and balanced 4-cliques with specific signed edge configurations respectively. We establish that the latter leads to an NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem, while the former is naturally guaranteed by the structural properties of the signed graph model. Based on this interpretation, we propose a dimensionality reduction method using a combinatorial formulation of the mean-variance optimization problem through a combinatorial hedge score metric for assets. The proposed framework is validated through extensive backtesting on 199 S\&P 500 assets over a 16-year period (2006 - 2021), demonstrating the effectiveness of reduced asset universes for portfolio construction using both Markowitz optimization and equally weighted strategy.

We introduce a variant of the multiway cut that we call the min-max connected multiway cut. Given a graph $G=(V,E)$ and a set $Γ\subseteq V$ of $t$ terminals, partition $V$ into $t$ parts such that each part is connected and contains exactly one terminal; the objective is to minimize the maximum weight of the edges leaving any part of the partition. This problem is a natural modification of the standard multiway cut problem and it differs from it in two ways: first, the cost of a partition is defined to be the maximum size of the boundary of any part, as opposed to the sum of all boundaries, and second, the subgraph induced by each part is required to be connected. Although the modified objective function has been considered before in the literature under the name min-max multiway cut, the requirement on each component to be connected has not been studied as far as we know. We show various hardness results for this problem, including a proof of weak NP-hardness of the weighted version of the problem on graphs with tree-width two, and provide a pseudopolynomial time algorithm as well as an FPTAS for the weighted problem on trees. As a consequence of our investigation we also show that the (unconstrained) min-max multiway cut problem is NP-hard even for three terminals, strengthening the known results.

We consider the problem of partitioning the edges of a graph into as few paths as possible. This is a~subject of the classic conjecture of Gallai and a recurring topic in combinatorics. Regarding the complexity of partitioning a graph optimally, Peroché [Discret. Appl. Math., 1984] proved that it is NP-hard already on graphs of maximum degree four, even when we only ask if two paths suffice. We show that the problem is solvable in polynomial time on subcubic graphs and then we present an efficient algorithm for ``almost-subcubic'' graphs. Precisely, we prove that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the edge-deletion distance to a subcubic graph. To this end, we reduce the task to model checking in first-order logic extended by disjoint-paths predicates ($\mathsf{FO}\text{+}\mathsf{DP}$) and then we employ the recent tractability result by Schirrmacher, Siebertz, Stamoulis, Thilikos, and Vigny [LICS 2024].

Gishboliner, Krivelevich, and Michaeli (2023) conjectured the following generalization of Dirac's theorem: If the minimum degree $δ$ of an $n$-vertex oriented graph $G$ is greater or equal to $n/2$, then $G$ has a Hamilton oriented cycle with at least $δ$ forward arcs. Freschi and Lo (2024) proved this conjecture. In this paper, we study the problem of maximizing the number of forward arcs in Hamilton oriented cycles/paths in generalizations of tournaments. We obtain characterizations for the maximum number of forward arcs in semicomplete multipartite digraphs and locally semicomplete digraphs. These characterizations lead to polynomial-time algorithms. Note that the above problems are NP-hard for some other generalizations of tournaments even though the Hamilton cycle problem is polynomial-time solvable for these digraph classes.

How can a stack of identical blocks be arranged to extend beyond the edge of a table as far as possible? We consider a generalization of this classic puzzle to blocks that differ in width and mass. Despite the seemingly simple premise, we demonstrate that it is unlikely that one can efficiently determine a stack configuration of maximum overhang. Formally, we prove that the Block-Stacking Problem is NP-hard, partially answering an open question from the literature. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the restriction to stacks without counterweights has a surprising connection to the Airplane Refueling Problem, another famous puzzle, and to Robust Appointment Scheduling, a problem of practical relevance. In addition to revealing a remarkable relation to the real-world challenge of devising schedules under uncertainty, their equivalence unveils a polynomial-time approximation scheme, that is, a $(1+ε)$-approximation algorithm, for Block Stacking without counterbalancing and a $(2+ε)$-approximation algorithm for the general case.

We give a short, self-contained, and easily verifiable proof that determining the outerthickness of a general graph is NP-hard. This resolves a long-standing open problem on the computational complexity of outerthickness. Moreover, our hardness result applies to a more general covering problem $P_F$, defined as follows. Fix a proper graph class $F$ whose membership is decidable. Given an undirected simple graph $G$ and an integer $k$, the task is to cover the edge set $E(G)$ by at most $k$ subsets $E_1,\ldots,E_k$ such that each subgraph $(V(G),E_i)$ belongs to $F$. Note that if $F$ is monotone (in particular, when $F$ is the class of all outerplanar graphs), any such cover can be converted into an edge partition by deleting overlaps; hence, in this case, covering and partitioning are equivalent. Our result shows that for every proper graph class $F$ whose membership is decidable and that satisfies all of the following conditions: (a) $F$ is closed under topological minors, (b) $F$ is closed under $1$-sums, and (c) $F$ contains a cycle of length $3$, the problem $P_F$ is NP-hard for every fixed integer $k\ge 3$. In particular: For $F$ equal to the class of all outerplanar graphs, our result settles the long-standing open problem on the complexity of determining outerthickness. For $F$ equal to the class of all planar graphs, our result complements Mansfield's NP-hardness result for the thickness, which applies only to the case $k=2$. It is also worth noting that each of the three conditions above is necessary. If $F$ is the class of all eulerian graphs, then cond. (a) fails. If $F$ is the class of all pseudoforests, then cond. (b) fails. If $F$ is the class of all forests, then cond. (c) fails. For each of these three classes $F$, the problem $P_F$ is solvable in polynomial time for every fixed integer $k\ge 3$, showing that none of the three conditions can be dropped.

The study of mutual visibility has traditionally focused on undirected graphs, asking for the maximum number of vertices that can communicate via shortest paths without intermediate interference from other set members. In this paper, we extend this concept to directed graphs, establishing fundamental results for several graph classes. We prove that for Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs), the mutual-visibility number $μ(D)$ is always 1, and for directed cycles of length $n\ge3$, it is strictly 2. In contrast, we demonstrate that tournaments can support arbitrarily large mutual-visibility sets; specifically, using properties of Paley tournaments, we show that $μ(T)$ grows linearly with the size of the tournament. On the algorithmic side, we show that while verifying a candidate set is polynomial-time solvable ($O(|S|(|V|+|A|))$), the problem of determining $μ(D)$ is NP-hard for general digraphs. We also analyze the impact of strong bridges and strongly connected components on the upper bounds of $μ(D)$.

Given a connected graph $G$ with at least three vertices, let $d_G(u,v)$ denote the distance between vertices $u,v\in V(G)$. A subset $S\subseteq V$ is called a doubly resolving set (DRS) of $G$ if for any two distinct vertices $u, v \in V(G)$, there exists a pair $\{x,y\}\subseteq S$ such that $d_G(u,x)-d_G(u,y)\neq d_G(v,x)-d_G(v,y)$. This paper studies the minimum cardinality of a DRS in the line graph of $G$, denoted by $Ψ(L(G))$. First, we prove that computing $Ψ(L(G))$ is NP-hard, even when $G$ is a bipartite graph. Second, we establish that $\lceil \log_2 (1+Δ(G))\rceil \le Ψ(L(G)) \le |V(G)| - 1$ holds for all $G$ with maximum degree $Δ(G)$, and show that both inequalities are tight. Finally, we determine the exact value of $Ψ(L(G))$ provided $G$ is a tree.

A cut in a graph $G$ is called a {\em bond} if both parts of the cut induce connected subgraphs in $G$, and the {\em bond polytope} is the convex hull of all bonds. Computing the maximum weight bond is an NP-hard problem even for planar graphs. However, the problem is solvable in linear time on $(K_5 \setminus e)$-minor-free graphs, and in more general, on graphs of bounded treewidth, essentially due to clique-sum decomposition into simpler graphs. We show how to obtain the bond polytope of graphs that are $1$- or $2$-sum of graphs $G_1$ and $ G_2$ from the bond polytopes of $G_1,G_2$. Using this we show that the extension complexity of the bond polytope of $(K_5 \setminus e)$-minor-free graphs is linear. Prior to this work, a linear size description of the bond polytope was known only for $3$-connected planar $(K_5 \setminus e)$-minor-free graphs, essentially only for wheel graphs. We also describe an elementary linear time algorithm for the \MaxBond problem on $(K_5\setminus e)$-minor-free graphs. Prior to this work, a linear time algorithm in this setting was known. However, the hidden constant in the big-Oh notation was large because the algorithm relies on the heavy machinery of linear time algorithms for graphs of bounded treewidth, used as a black box.

Given a c-colored graph G, a vertex of G is happy if it has the same color as all its neighbors. The notion of happy vertices was introduced by Zhang and Li to compute the homophily of a graph. Eto, et al. introduced the Maker-Maker version of the Happy vertex game, where two players compete to claim more happy vertices than their opponent. We introduce here the Maker-Breaker happy vertex game: two players, Maker and Breaker, alternately color the vertices of a graph with their respective colors. Maker aims to maximize the number of happy vertices at the end, while Breaker aims to prevent her. This game is also a scoring version of the Maker-Breaker Domination game introduced by Duchene, et al. as a happy vertex corresponds exactly to a vertex that is not dominated in the domination game. Therefore, this game is a very natural game on graphs and can be studied within the scope of scoring positional games. We initiate here the complexity study of this game, by proving that computing its score is PSPACE-complete on trees, NP-hard on caterpillars, and polynomial on subdivided stars. Finally, we provide the exact value of the score on graphs of maximum degree 2, and we provide an FPT-algorithm to compute the score on graphs of bounded neighborhood diversity. An important contribution of the paper is that, to achieve our hardness results, we introduce a new type of incidence graph called the literal-clause incidence graph for 2-SAT formulas. We prove that QMAX 2-SAT remains PSPACE-complete even if this graph is acyclic, and that MAX 2-SAT remains NP-complete, even if this graph is acyclic and has maximum degree 2, i.e. is a union of paths. We demonstrate the importance of this contribution by proving that Incidence, the scoring positional game played on a graph is also PSPACE-complete when restricted to forests.

As the class $\mathcal T_4$ of graphs of twin-width at most 4 contains every finite subgraph of the infinite grid and every graph obtained by subdividing each edge of an $n$-vertex graph at least $2 \log n$ times, most NP-hard graph problems, like Max Independent Set, Dominating Set, Hamiltonian Cycle, remain so on $\mathcal T_4$. However, Min Coloring and k-Coloring are easy on both families because they are 2-colorable and 3-colorable, respectively. We show that Min Coloring is NP-hard on the class $\mathcal T_3$ of graphs of twin-width at most 3. This is the first hardness result on $\mathcal T_3$ for a problem that is easy on cographs (twin-width 0), on trees (whose twin-width is at most 2), and on unit circular-arc graphs (whose twin-width is at most 3). We also show that for every $k \geqslant 3$, k-Coloring is NP-hard on $\mathcal T_4$. We finally make two observations: (1) there are currently very few problems known to be in P on $\mathcal T_d$ (graphs of twin-width at most $d$) and NP-hard on $\mathcal T_{d+1}$ for some nonnegative integer $d$, and (2) unlike $\mathcal T_4$, which contains every graph as an induced minor, the class $\mathcal T_3$ excludes a fixed planar graph as an induced minor; thus it may be viewed as a special case (or potential counterexample) for conjectures about classes excluding a (planar) induced minor. These observations are accompanied by several open questions.

We investigate the problem of strong connectivity augmentation within plane oriented graphs. We show that deciding whether a plane oriented graph $D$ can be augmented with (any number of) arcs $X$ such that $D+X$ is strongly connected, but still plane and oriented, is NP-hard. This question becomes trivial within plane digraphs, like most connectivity augmentation problems without a budget constraint. The budgeted version, Plane Strong Connectivity Augmentation (PSCA) considers a plane oriented graph $D$ along with some integer $k$, and asks for an $X$ of size at most $k$ ensuring that $D+X$ is strongly connected, while remaining plane and oriented. Our main result is a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm for PSCA, running in time $2^{O(k)} n^{O(1)}$. The cornerstone of our procedure is a structural result showing that, for any fixed $k$, each face admits a bounded number of partial solutions "dominating" all others. Then, our algorithm for PSCA combines face-wise branching with a Monte-Carlo reduction to the polynomial Minimum Dijoin problem, which we derandomize. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first FPT algorithm for a (hard) connectivity augmentation problem constrained by planarity.

A weak deletion sequence is a sequence $(G_1,\ldots,G_n)$ of graphs so that for each $i\in[n-1]$ either $G_i$ is isomorphic to a subgraph of $G_{i+1}$, or vice versa: $G_{i+1}$ is isomorphic to a subgraph of $G_i$. We prove that determining the simultaneous planar embeddability of weak deletion sequences of $2$-connected graphs is NP-hard.

The mim-width of a graph is a powerful structural parameter that, when bounded by a constant, allows several hard problems to be polynomial-time solvable - with a recent meta-theorem encompassing a large class of problems [SODA2023]. Since its introduction, several variants such as sim-width and omim-width were developed, along with a linear version of these parameters. It was recently shown that mim-width and all these variants all paraNP-hard, a consequence of the NP-hardness of distinguishing between graphs of linear mim-width at most 1211 and graphs of sim-width at least 1216 [ICALP2025]. The complexity of recognizing graphs of small width, particularly those close to $1$, remained open, despite their especially attractive algorithmic applications. In this work, we show that the width recognition problems remain NP-hard even on small widths. Specifically, after introducing the novel parameter Omim-width sandwiched between omim-width and mim-width, we show that: (1) deciding whether a graph has sim-width = 1, omim-width = 1, or Omin-width = 1 is NP-hard, and the same is true for their linear variants; (2) the problems of deciding whether mim-width $\leq$ 2 or linear mim-width $\leq$ 2 are both NP-hard. Interestingly, our reductions are relatively simple and are from the Unrooted Quartet Consistency problem, which is of great interest in computational biology but is not commonly used (if ever) in the theory of algorithms.