arXiv++ Combinatorics

Dimension of partially ordered sets (posets for short) can be seen as a measure of how much space is needed to store posets. Refining the definition of dimension, or actually the local dimension, in this respect we obtain the notion of relative dimension. We discuss properties of relative dimension and we give bounds for relative dimension of some well-known families of posets.

The dimension of a poset $P$ is the minimum positive integer $d$ such that $P$ is an induced subposet of $\mathbb{R}^d$ equipped with the product order. We give a constant-factor polynomial-time approximation algorithm for computing dimension in the class of posets with a planar (Hasse) diagram. While computing the dimension of a poset is NP-hard in general, the computational complexity of the problem for planar posets remains open. The algorithmic result is driven by a structural understanding of the canonical obstruction to small dimension: standard examples. A longstanding problem, originating in the early 1980s, asked whether every poset with a planar diagram has dimension bounded by a function of the maximum order of a standard example that it contains. In the first paper of the series, we have resolved the problem in a more general setting of posets with planar cover graphs by establishing a polynomial bound. We prove a stronger bound in the original setting, namely, for every poset $P$ with a planar diagram $\mathrm{dim}(P) \leq 96\mathrm{se}(P)+672$, where $\mathrm{dim}(P)$ denotes the dimension of $P$ and $\mathrm{se}(P)$ denotes the maximum order of a standard example contained in $P$.

The dimension of a partially ordered set $P$ (poset for short) is the least positive integer $d$ such that $P$ is isomorphic to a subposet of $\mathbb{R}^d$ with the natural product order. Dimension is arguably the most widely studied measure of complexity for posets, and standard examples in posets are the canonical structure forcing dimension to be large. In many ways, dimension for posets is analogous to chromatic number for graphs with standard examples in posets playing the role of cliques in graphs. However, planar graphs have chromatic number at most four, while posets with planar diagrams may have arbitrarily large dimension. The key feature of all known constructions of such posets is that large dimension is forced by a large standard example. The question of whether every poset of large dimension and with a planar cover graph contains a large standard example has been a critical challenge in posets theory since the early 1980s, with very little progress over the years. We answer the question in the affirmative. Namely, we show that every poset $P$ with a planar cover graph has dimension $\mathcal{O}(s^8)$, where $s$ is the maximum order of a standard example in $P$.

Given a poset $P$, a family $\mathcal{S}=\{S_x:x\in P\}$ of sets indexed by the elements of $P$ is called an inclusion representation of $P$ if $x\leqslant y$ in $P$ if and only if $S_x\subseteq S_y$. The cube height of a poset is the least non-negative integer $h$ such that $P$ has an inclusion representation for which every set has size at most $h$. In turn, the cube width of $P$ is the least non-negative integer $w$ for which there is an inclusion representation $\mathcal{S}$ of $P$ such that $|\bigcup\mathcal{S}|=w$ and every set in $\mathcal{S}$ has size at most the cube height of $P$. In this paper, we show that the cube width of a poset never exceeds the size of its ground set, and we characterize those posets for which this inequality is tight. Our research prompted us to investigate related extremal problems for posets and inclusion representations. Accordingly, the results for cube width are obtained as extensions of more comprehensive results that we believe to be of independent interest.

Over the past 10 years, there has been considerable interest in exploring questions connecting dimension for posets with graph theoretic properties of their cover graphs and order diagrams, especially with the concepts of planarity and treewidth. Joret and Micek conjectured that if $P$ is a poset with a planar cover graph, then the dimension of $P$ is bounded in terms of the number of minimal elements of $P$ and the treewidth of the cover graph of $P$. We settle this conjecture in the affirmative by strengthening a recent breakthrough result [14] by Blake, Micek, and Trotter, who proved that for each poset $P$ admitting a planar cover graph and a unique minimal element we have $\mathrm{dim}(P) \leq 2 \mathrm{se}(P) + 2$, namely, we prove that $\mathrm{dim}(P) \leq 2 \mathrm{wheel}(P) + 2$.

Let $X$ be a finite set. A family $P$ of subsets of $X$ is called a convex geometry with ground set $X$ if (1) $\emptyset, X\in P$; (2) $A\cap B\in P$ whenever $A,B\in P$; and (3) if $A\in P$ and $A\neq X$, there is an element $α\in X-A$ such that $A\cup\{α\}\in P$. As a non-empty family of sets, a convex geometry has a well defined VC-dimension. In the literature, a second parameter, called convex dimension, has been defined expressly for these structures. Partially ordered by inclusion, a convex geometry is also a poset, and four additional dimension parameters have been defined for this larger class, called Dushnik-Miller dimension, Boolean dimension, local dimension, and fractional dimension, espectively. For each pair of these six dimension parameters, we investigate whether there is an infinite class of convex geometries on which one parameter is bounded and the other is not.

In 1989, Nešetřil and Pudlák posed the following challenging question: Do planar posets have bounded Boolean dimension? We show that every poset with a planar cover graph and a unique minimal element has Boolean dimension at most $13$. As a consequence, we are able to show that there is a reachability labeling scheme with labels consisting of $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$ bits for planar digraphs with a single source. The best known scheme for general planar digraphs uses labels with $\mathcal{O}(\log^2 n)$ bits [Thorup JACM 2004], and it remains open to determine whether a scheme using labels with $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$ bits exists. The Boolean dimension result is proved in tandem with a second result showing that the dimension of a poset with a planar cover graph and a unique minimal element is bounded by a linear function of its standard example number. However, one of the major challenges in dimension theory is to determine whether dimension is bounded in terms of standard example number for all posets with planar cover graphs.

Previously, Erdős, Kierstead and Trotter investigated the dimension of random height~$2$ partially ordered sets. Their research was motivated primarily by two goals: (1)~analyzing the relative tightness of the Füredi-Kahn upper bounds on dimension in terms of maximum degree; and (2)~developing machinery for estimating the expected dimension of a random labeled poset on $n$ points. For these reasons, most of their effort was focused on the case $0<p\le 1/2$. While bounds were given for the range $1/2\le p <1$, the relative accuracy of the results in the original paper deteriorated as $p$ approaches~$1$. Motivated by two extremal problems involving conditions that force a poset to contain a large standard example, we were compelled to revisit this subject, but now with primary emphasis on the range $1/2\le p<1$. Our sharpened analysis shows that as $p$ approaches~$1$, the expected value of dimension increases and then decreases, answering in the negative a question posed in the original paper. Along the way, we apply inequalities of Talagrand and Janson, establish connections with latin rectangles and the Euler product function, and make progress on both extremal problems.

We show that height $h$ posets that have planar cover graphs have dimension $\mathcal{O}(h^6)$. Previously, the best upper bound was $2^{\mathcal{O}(h^3)}$. Planarity plays a key role in our arguments, since there are posets such that (1) dimension is exponential in height and (2) the cover graph excludes $K_5$ as a minor.

Planar posets can have arbitrarily large dimension. However, a planar poset of height $h$ has dimension at most $192h+96$, while a planar poset with $t$ minimal elements has dimension at most $2t+1$. In particular, a planar poset with a unique minimal element has dimension at most $3$. In this paper, we extend this result by showing that a planar poset has dimension at most $6$ if it has a plane diagram in which every minimal element is accessible from below.

The original notion of dimension for posets was introduced by Dushnik and Miller in 1941 and has been studied extensively in the literature. In 1992, Brightwell and Scheinerman developed the notion of fractional dimension as the natural linear programming relaxation of the Dushnik-Miller concept. In 2016, Ueckerdt introduced the concept of local dimension, and in just three years, several research papers studying this new parameter have been published. In this paper, we introduce and study fractional local dimension. As suggested by the terminology, our parameter is a common generalization of fractional dimension and local dimension. For a pair $(n,d)$ with $2\le d<n$, we consider the poset $P(1,d;n)$ consisting of all $1$-element and $d$-element subsets of $\{1,\dots,n\}$ partially ordered by inclusion. This poset has fractional dimension $d+1$, but for fixed $d\ge2$, its local dimension goes to infinity with $n$. On the other hand, we show that as $n$ tends to infinity, the fractional local dimension of $P(1,d;n)$ tends to a value $\text{FLD}(d)$ which we will be able to determine exactly. For all $d\ge2$, $\text{FLD}(d)$ is strictly less than $d+1$, and for large $d$, $\text{FLD}(d)\sim d/(\log d-\log\log d-o(1))$. As an immediate corollary, we show that if $P$ is a poset, and $d$ is the maximum degree of a vertex in the comparability graph of $P$, then the fractional local dimension of $P$, is at most $2+\text{FLD}(d).$ Our arguments use both discrete and continuous methods.

We investigate the behavior of Boolean dimension with respect to components and blocks. To put our results in context, we note that for Dushnik-Miller dimension, we have that if $\dim(C)\le d$ for every component $C$ of a poset $P$, then $\dim(P)\le \max\{2,d\}$; also if $\dim(B)\le d$ for every block $B$ of a poset $P$, then $\dim(P)\le d+2$. By way of constrast, local dimension is well behaved with respect to components, but not for blocks: if $\text{ldim}(C)\le d$ for every component $C$ of a poset $P$, then $\text{ldim}(P)\le d+2$; however, for every $d\ge 4$, there exists a poset $P$ with $\text{ldim}(P)=d$ and $\dim(B)\le 3$ for every block $B$ of $P$. In this paper we show that Boolean dimension behaves like Dushnik-Miller dimension with respect to both components and blocks: if $\text{bdim}(C)\le d$ for every component $C$ of $P$, then $\text{bdim}(P)\le 2+d+4\cdot2^d$; also if $\text{bdim}(B)\le d$ for every block of $P$, then $\text{bdim}(P)\le 19+d+18\cdot 2^d$.

In 1981, Kelly showed that planar posets can have arbitrarily large dimension. However, the posets in Kelly's example have bounded Boolean dimension and bounded local dimension, leading naturally to the questions as to whether either Boolean dimension or local dimension is bounded for the class of planar posets. The question for Boolean dimension was first posed by Nešetřil and Pudlák in 1989 and remains unanswered today. The concept of local dimension is quite new, introduced in 2016 by Ueckerdt. Since that time, researchers have obtained many interesting results concerning Boolean dimension and local dimension, contrasting these parameters with the classic Dushnik-Miller concept of dimension, and establishing links between both parameters and structural graph theory, path-width, and tree-width in particular. Here we show that local dimension is not bounded on the class of planar posets. Our proof also shows that the local dimension of a poset is not bounded in terms of the maximum local dimension of its blocks, and it provides an alternative proof of the fact that the local dimension of a poset cannot be bounded in terms of the tree-width of its cover graph, independent of its height.

The original notion of dimension for posets is due to Dushnik and Miller and has been studied extensively in the literature. Quite recently, there has been considerable interest in two variations of dimension known as Boolean dimension and local dimension. For a poset $P$, the Boolean dimension of $P$ and the local dimension of $P$ are both bounded from above by the dimension of $P$ and can be considerably less. Our primary goal will be to study analogies and contrasts among these three parameters. As one example, it is known that the dimension of a poset is bounded as a function of its height and the tree-width of its cover graph. The Boolean dimension of a poset is bounded in terms of the tree-width of its cover graph, independent of its height. We show that the local dimension of a poset cannot be bounded in terms of the tree-width of its cover graph, independent of height. We also prove that the local dimension of a poset is bounded in terms of the path-width of its cover graph. In several of our results, Ramsey theoretic methods will be applied.

There is a natural way to associate with a poset $P$ a hypergraph $H$, called the hypergraph of critical pairs, so that the dimension of $P$ is exactly equal to the chromatic number of $H$. The edges of $H$ have variable sizes, but it is of interest to consider the graph $G$ formed by the edges of $H$ that have size~2. The chromatic number of $G$ is less than or equal to the dimension of $P$ and the difference between the two values can be arbitrarily large. Nevertheless, there are important instances where the two parameters are the same, and we study one of these in this paper. Our focus is on a family $\{S_n^k:n\ge 3, k\ge 0\}$ of height two posets called crowns. We show that the chromatic number of the graph $G_n^k$ of critical pairs of the crown $S_n^k$ is the same as the dimension of $S_n^k$, which is known to be $\lceil 2(n+k)/(k+2)\rceil$. In fact, this theorem follows as an immediate corollary to the stronger result: The independence number of $G_n^k$ is $(k+1)(k+2)/2$. We obtain this theorem as part of a comprehensive analysis of independent sets in $G_n^k$ including the determination of the second largest size among the maximal independent sets, both the reversible and non-reversible types.

Dimension is a standard and well-studied measure of complexity of posets. Recent research has provided many new upper bounds on the dimension for various structurally restricted classes of posets. Bounded dimension gives a succinct representation of the poset, admitting constant response time for queries of the form "is $x<y$?". This application motivates looking for stronger notions of dimension, possibly leading to succinct representations for more general classes of posets. We focus on two: boolean dimension, introduced in the 1980s and revisited in recent research, and local dimension, a very new one. We determine precisely which values of dimension/boolean dimension/local dimension imply that the two other parameters are bounded.

A classic result of Asplund and Grünbaum states that intersection graphs of axis-aligned rectangles in the plane are $χ$-bounded. This theorem can be equivalently stated in terms of path-decompositions as follows: There exists a function $f:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}$ such that every graph that has two path-decompositions such that each bag of the first decomposition intersects each bag of the second in at most $k$ vertices has chromatic number at most $f(k)$. Recently, Dujmović, Joret, Morin, Norin, and Wood asked whether this remains true more generally for two tree-decompositions. In this note we provide a negative answer: There are graphs with arbitrarily large chromatic number for which one can find two tree-decompositions such that each bag of the first decomposition intersects each bag of the second in at most two vertices. Furthermore, this remains true even if one of the two decompositions is restricted to be a path-decomposition. This is shown using a construction of triangle-free graphs with unbounded chromatic number due to Burling, which we believe should be more widely known.

We apply Ramsey theoretic tools to show that there is a family of graphs which have tree-chromatic number at most~$2$ while the path-chromatic number is unbounded. This resolves a problem posed by Seymour.

It has been known for more than 40 years that there are posets with planar cover graphs and arbitrarily large dimension. Recently, Streib and Trotter proved that such posets must have large height. In fact, all known constructions of such posets have two large disjoint chains with all points in one chain incomparable with all points in the other. Gutowski and Krawczyk conjectured that this feature is necessary. More formally, they conjectured that for every $k\geq 1$, there is a constant $d$ such that if $P$ is a poset with a planar cover graph and $P$ excludes $\mathbf{k}+\mathbf{k}$, then $\dim(P)\leq d$. We settle their conjecture in the affirmative. We also discuss possibilities of generalizing the result by relaxing the condition that the cover graph is planar.

Motivated by quite recent research involving the relationship between the dimension of a poset and graph-theoretic properties of its cover graph, we show that for every $d\geq 1$, if $P$ is a poset and the dimension of a subposet $B$ of $P$ is at most $d$ whenever the cover graph of $B$ is a block of the cover graph of $P$, then the dimension of $P$ is at most $d+2$. We also construct examples which show that this inequality is best possible. We consider the proof of the upper bound to be fairly elegant and relatively compact. However, we know of no simple proof for the lower bound, and our argument requires a powerful tool known as the Product Ramsey Theorem. As a consequence, our constructions involve posets of enormous size.