arXiv++ Combinatorics

We prove that for every prime power $q$ and every $p \in (0, 1-1/q)$, a random $\mathbb{F}_q$-linear code of rate $1 - h_q(p) - ε$ is $(p, C_{p,q}/ε)$-average-radius list-decodable with probability at least $1 - q^{-Ω(n)}$, i.e., for every center $y \in \mathbb{F}_q^n$, the $C_{p,q}/ε$ codewords closest to $y$ have average fractional Hamming distance at least $p$ from $y$. This extends a similar result for (standard) list-decoding due to Guruswami, Håstad, and Kopparty (2010) to the stronger average-radius guarantee, with the same $O(1/ε)$ list size. For average-radius list-decoding, such a result was previously known only for binary linear codes (Guruswami, Li, Mosheiff, Resch, Silas, and Wootters, 2021) and for general (non-linear) random codes over arbitrary alphabets (Elias, 1991).

The resonance arrangement $\mathcal{A}_n$ is the arrangement of hyperplanes in $\mathbb{R}^n$ given by all hyperplanes of the form $\sum_{i \in I} x_i = 0$, where $I$ is a nonempty subset of $\{1,\dots,n\}$. We consider the characteristic polynomial $χ(\mathcal{A}_n; t)$ of the resonance arrangement, whose value $R_n$ at $-1$ is of particular interest, and corresponds to counts of generalized retarded functions in quantum field theory, among other things. No formula is known for either the characteristic polynomial or $R_n$, though $R_n$ has been computed up to $n=8$. By exploiting symmetry and using computational methods, we compute the characteristic polynomial of $\mathcal{A}_9$, and thus obtain $R_9$. The coefficients of the characteristic polynomial are also equal to the so-called Betti numbers of the complexified hyperplane arrangement; that is, the coefficient of $t^{n-i}$ is denoted by the Betti number $b_i(\mathcal{A}_n)$. Explicit formulas are known for the Betti numbers up to $b_3(\mathcal{A}_n)$. Using computational methods, we also obtain an explicit formula for $b_4(\mathcal{A}_n)$, which gives the $t^{n-4}$ coefficient of the characteristic polynomial.

We consider families of $k$-subsets of $\{1, \dots, n\}$, where $n$ is a multiple of $k$, which have no perfect matching. An equivalent condition for a family $\mathcal{F}$ to have no perfect matching is for there to be a blocking set, which is a set of $b$ elements of $\{1, \dots, n\}$ that cannot be covered by $b$ disjoint sets in $\mathcal{F}$. We are specifically interested in the largest possible size of a family $\mathcal{F}$ with no perfect matching and no blocking set of size less than $b$. Frankl resolved the case of families with no singleton blocking set (in other words, the $b=2$ case) for sufficiently large $n$ and conjectured an optimal construction for general $b$. Though Frankl's construction fails to be optimal for $k = 2, 3$, we show that the construction is optimal whenever $k \ge 100$ and $n$ is sufficiently large.

Defant, Engen, and Miller defined a refinement of Lassalle's sequence $A_{k+1}$ by considering uniquely sorted permutations of length $2k+1$ whose first element is $\ell$. They showed that each such sequence is symmetric in $\ell$ and conjectured that these sequences are unimodal. We prove that the sequences are unimodal.

A permutation $σ\in S_n$ is said to be $k$-universal or a $k$-superpattern if for every $π\in S_k$, there is a subsequence of $σ$ that is order-isomorphic to $π$. A simple counting argument shows that $σ$ can be a $k$-superpattern only if $n\ge (1/e^2+o(1))k^2$, and Arratia conjectured that this lower bound is best-possible. Disproving Arratia's conjecture, we improve the trivial bound by a small constant factor. We accomplish this by designing an efficient encoding scheme for the patterns that appear in $σ$. This approach is quite flexible and is applicable to other universality-type problems; for example, we also improve a bound by Engen and Vatter on a problem concerning $(k+1)$-ary sequences which contain all $k$-permutations.

The classical Erdős-Littlewood-Offord problem concerns the random variable $X = a_1 ξ_1 + \dots + a_n ξ_n$, where $a_i \in \mathbb{R} \setminus \{0\}$ are fixed and $ξ_i \sim \text{Ber}(1/2)$ are independent. The Erdős-Littlewood-Offord theorem states that the maximum possible concentration probability $\max_{x \in \mathbb{R}} \Pr(X = x)$ is $\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor} / 2^n$, achieved when the $a_i$ are all $1$. As proposed by Fox, Kwan, and Sauermann, we investigate the general case where $ξ_i \sim \text{Ber}(p)$ instead. Using purely combinatorial techniques, we show that the exact maximum concentration probability is achieved when $a_i \in \{-1, 1\}$ for each $i$. Then, using Fourier-analytic techniques, we investigate the optimal ratio of $1$s to $-1$s. Surprisingly, we find that in some cases, the numbers of $1$s and $-1$s can be far from equal.