arXiv++ Combinatorics

The group testing problem is concerned with identifying a small set of $k$ infected individuals in a large population of $n$ people. At our disposal is a testing scheme that can test groups of individuals. A test comes back positive if and only if at least one individual is infected. In this note, we lay groundwork for analysing belief propagation for group testing when $k$ scales linearly in $n$. To this end, we derive the offspring distribution for different types of individuals. With these distributions at hand, one can employ the population dynamics algorithm to simulate the posterior marginal distribution resulting from belief propagation.

Recent advances in noiseless non-adaptive group testing have led to a precise asymptotic characterization of the number of tests required for high-probability recovery in the sublinear regime $k = n^θ$ (with $θ\in (0,1)$), with $n$ individuals among which $k$ are infected. However, the required number of tests may increase substantially under real-world practical constraints, notably including bounds on the maximum number $Δ$ of tests an individual can be placed in, or the maximum number $Γ$ of individuals in a given test. While previous works have given recovery guarantees for these settings, significant gaps remain between the achievability and converse bounds. In this paper, we substantially or completely close several of the most prominent gaps. In the case of $Δ$-divisible items, we show that the definite defectives (DD) algorithm coupled with a random regular design is asymptotically optimal in dense scaling regimes, and optimal to within a factor of $\eul$ more generally; we establish this by strengthening both the best known achievability and converse bounds. In the case of $Γ$-sized tests, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the regime $Γ= Θ(1)$, and again establish a precise threshold proving the asymptotic optimality of SCOMP (a slight refinement of DD) equipped with a tailored pooling scheme. Finally, for each of these two settings, we provide near-optimal adaptive algorithms based on sequential splitting, and provably demonstrate gaps between the performance of optimal adaptive and non-adaptive algorithms.

In the group testing problem the aim is to identify a small set of $k\sim n^θ$ infected individuals out of a population size $n$, $0<θ<1$. We avail ourselves of a test procedure capable of testing groups of individuals, with the test returning a positive result iff at least one individual in the group is infected. The aim is to devise a test design with as few tests as possible so that the set of infected individuals can be identified correctly with high probability. We establish an explicit sharp information-theoretic/algorithmic phase transition $\minf$ for non-adaptive group testing, where all tests are conducted in parallel. Thus, with more than $\minf$ tests the infected individuals can be identified in polynomial time \whp, while learning the set of infected individuals is information-theoretically impossible with fewer tests. In addition, we develop an optimal adaptive scheme where the tests are conducted in two stages.