arXiv++ Combinatorics

We show that every planar triangulation on $n$ vertices has a maximal independent set of size at most $n/3$. This affirms a conjecture by Botler, Fernandes and Gutiérrez [Electron.\ J.\ Comb., 2024], which in turn would follow if an open question of Goddard and Henning [Appl.\ Math.\ Comput., 2020] which asks if every planar triangulation has three disjoint maximal independent sets were answered in the affirmative. Since a maximal independent set is a special type of dominating set (independent dominating set), this is a structural strengthening of a major result by Matheson and Tarjan [Eur.\ J.\ Comb., 1996] that every triangulated disc has a dominating set of size at most $n/3$, but restricted to triangulations.

A dominating set of a graph $G$ is a subset $S$ of its vertices such that each vertex of $G$ not in $S$ has a neighbor in $S$. A face-hitting set of a plane graph $G$ is a set $T$ of vertices in $G$ such that every face of $G$ contains at least one vertex of $T$. We show that the vertex-set of every plane (multi-)graph without isolated vertices, self-loops or $2$-faces can be partitioned into two disjoint sets so that both the sets are dominating and face-hitting. We also show that all the three assumptions above are necessary for the conclusion. As a corollary, we show that every $n$-vertex simple plane triangulation has a dominating set of size at most $(1 - α)n/2$, where $αn$ is the maximum size of an independent set in the triangulation. Matheson and Tarjan [European J. Combin., 1996] conjectured that every plane triangulation with a sufficiently large number of vertices $n$ has a dominating set of size at most $n / 4$. Currently, the best known general bound for this is by Christiansen, Rotenberg and Rutschmann [SODA, 2024] who showed that every plane triangulation on $n > 10$ vertices has a dominating set of size at most $2n/7$. Our corollary improves their bound for $n$-vertex plane triangulations which contain a maximal independent set of size either less than $2n/7$ or more than $3n/7$.

We show that every simple planar near-triangulation with minimum degree at least three contains two disjoint total dominating sets. The class includes all simple planar triangulations other than the triangle. This affirms a conjecture of Goddard and Henning [Thoroughly dispersed colorings, J. Graph Theory, 88 (2018) 174-191].

The class of $2K_2$-free graphs have been well studied in various contexts in the past. It is known that the class of $\{2K_2,2K_1+K_p\}$-free graphs and $\{2K_2,(K_1\cup K_2)+K_p\}$-free graphs admits a linear $χ$-binding function. In this paper, we study the classes of $(P_3\cup P_2)$-free graphs which is a superclass of $2K_2$-free graphs. We show that $\{P_3\cup P_2,2K_1+K_p\}$-free graphs and $\{P_3\cup P_2,(K_1\cup K_2)+K_p\}$-free graphs also admits linear $χ$-binding functions. In addition, we give tight chromatic bounds for $\{P_3\cup P_2,HVN\}$-free graphs and $\{P_3\cup P_2,diamond\}$-free graphs and it can be seen that the latter is an improvement of the existing bound given by A. P. Bharathi and S. A. Choudum [Colouring of $(P_3\cup P_2)$-free graphs, Graphs and Combinatorics 34 (2018), 97-107].

A \emph{domatic} (\emph{total domatic}) \emph{$k$-coloring} of a graph $G$ is an assignment of $k$ colors to the vertices of $G$ such that each vertex contains vertices of all $k$ colors in its closed neighborhood (neighborhood). The \emph{domatic} (\emph{total domatic}) \emph{number} of $G$, denoted $d(G)$ ($d_t (G)$), is the maximum $k$ for which $G$ has a domatic (total domatic) $k$-coloring. In this paper, we show that for two non-trivial graphs $G$ and $H$, the domatic and total domatic numbers of their Cartesian product $G \cart H$ is bounded above by $\max\{|V(G)|, |V(H)|\}$ and below by $\max\{d(G), d(H)\}$. Both these bounds are tight for an infinite family of graphs. Further, we show that if $H$ is bipartite, then $d_t(G \cart H)$ is bounded below by $2\min\{d_t(G),d_t(H)\}$ and $d(G \cart H)$ is bounded below by $2\min\{d(G),d_t(H)\}$. These bounds give easy proofs for many of the known bounds on the domatic and total domatic numbers of hypercubes \cite{chen,zel4} and the domination and total domination numbers of hypercubes \cite{har,joh} and also give new bounds for Hamming graphs. We also obtain the domatic (total domatic) number and domination (total domination) number of $n$-dimensional torus $\mathop{\cart}\limits_{i=1}^{n} C_{k_i}$ with some suitable conditions to each $k_i$, which turns out to be a generalization of a result due to Gravier \cite{grav2} %[\emph{Total domination number of grid graphs}, Discrete Appl. Math. 121 (2002) 119-128] and give easy proof of a result due to Klavžar and Seifter \cite{sand}.

The b-chromatic number $b(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the maximum $k$ for which $G$ has a proper vertex coloring using $k$ colors such that each color class contains at least one vertex adjacent to a vertex of every other color class. In this paper, we mainly investigate on one of the open problems given in [P. Francis, S. Francis Raj, On b-coloring of powers of hypercubes, Discrete Appl. Math. 225 (2017) 74-86.]. As a consequence, we have obtained an upper bound for the b-chromatic number of some powers of hypercubes. This turns out to be an improvement of the already existing bound in [P. Francis, S. Francis Raj, On b-coloring of powers of hypercubes, Discrete Appl. Math. 225 (2017) 74-86.]. Further, we have determined a lower bound for the b-chromatic number of some powers of the Hamming graph, a generalization of the hypercube.

Indicated coloring is a graph coloring game in which two players collectively color the vertices of a graph in the following way. In each round the first player (Ann) selects a vertex, and then the second player (Ben) colors it properly, using a fixed set of colors. The goal of Ann is to achieve a proper coloring of the whole graph, while Ben is trying to prevent the realization of this project. The smallest number of colors necessary for Ann to win the game on a graph $G$ (regardless of Ben's strategy) is called the indicated chromatic number of $G$, denoted by $χ_i(G)$. In this paper, we have shown that for any graphs $G$ and $H$, $G[H]$ is $k$-indicated colorable for all $k\geq\mathrm{col}(G)\mathrm{col}(H)$. Also, we have shown that for any graph $G$ and for some classes of graphs $H$ with $χ(H)=χ_i(H)=\ell$, $G[H]$ is $k$-indicated colorable if and only if $G[K_\ell]$ is $k$-indicated colorable. As a consequence of this result we have shown that for some particular families of graphs $G$ and $H$, $G[H]$ is $k$-indicated colorable for every $k\geq χ(G[H])$. This serves as a partial answer to one of the questions raised by A. Grzesik in \cite{and}. In addition, if $G$ is a Bipartite graph or a $\{P_5,K_3\}$-free graph (or) a $\{P_5,Paw\}$-free graph and if $H$ is from the same families of graphs, then we have shown that $χ_i(G[H])=χ(G[H])$.

Indicated coloring is a type of game coloring in which two players collectively color the vertices of a graph in the following way. In each round the first player (Ann) selects a vertex, and then the second player (Ben) colors it properly, using a fixed set of colors. The goal of Ann is to achieve a proper coloring of the whole graph, while Ben is trying to prevent the realization of this project. The smallest number of colors necessary for Ann to win the game on a graph $G$ (regardless of Ben's strategy) is called the indicated chromatic number of $G$, denoted by $χ_i(G)$. In this paper, we obtain structural characterization of connected $\{P_5,K_4,Kite,Bull\}$-free graphs which contains an induced $C_5$ and connected $\{P_6,C_5, K_{1,3}\}$-free graphs that contains an induced $C_6$. Also, we prove that $\{P_5,K_4,Kite,Bull\}$-free graphs that contains an induced $C_5$ and $\{P_6,C_5,\overline{P_5}, K_{1,3}\}$-free graphs which contains an induced $C_6$ are $k$-indicated colorable for all $k\geqχ(G)$. In addition, we show that $\mathbb{K}[C_5]$ is $k$-indicated colorable for all $k\geqχ(G)$ and as a consequence, we exhibit that $\{P_2\cup P_3, C_4\}$-free graphs, $\{P_5,C_4\}$-free graphs are $k$-indicated colorable for all $k\geqχ(G)$. This partially answers one of the questions which was raised by A. Grzesik in \cite{and}.