arXiv++ Combinatorics

A longstanding problem in spectral graph theory asks for graphs with maximum number of spanning trees among all connected simple graphs with a prescribed number of vertices and edges. Such graphs are called t-optimal graphs. Petingi and Rodríguez [Discrete Math. 244 (2002), 351--373] achieved in finding infinitely many t-optimal graphs. Basically, they reduced the problem of finding t-optimal graphs to the determination of almost-regular graphs with minimum number of induced 3-paths. In this work we revisit the construction of t-optimal graphs given by Petingi and Rodríguez. Then, we generalize the previous construction using the key concept of trace-minimal graph introduced by Ábrego et al. [Linear Algebra Appl. 412 (2006) 161--221]. Finally, as a consequence, we construct infinitely many new t-optimal regular graphs.

A two-terminal graph is a graph G equipped with two vertices in V(G) called terminals. Let T(n,m) be the set of two-terminal graphs on n vertices and m edges. Let G be in T(n,m) and let p be in [0,1]. The two-terminal reliability of G at p, denoted R_G(p), is the probability that G has a path joining its terminals after each of its edges is independently removed with probability 1 - p. We say G is a locally most reliable two-terminal graph (LMRTTG) if for each H in T(n,m) there exists a positive real number delta such that for every p in (0, delta) it holds that R_G(p) >= R_H(p). It is simple to prove that there exists a unique LMRTTG in T(n,m) when n >= 4 and 5 <= m <= 2n - 3. Gong and Lin [Discrete Appl. Math. 356 (2024), 393-402] further proved that there exists a unique LMRTTG in T(n,m) when n >= 6 and 2n - 3 <= m <= n(n - 1)/2, except for some pairs of integers n and m which satisfy that n >= 6 and (1/2)(n - 2)(n - 3) - (n - 2)/2 <= m - (2n - 3) <= (1/2)(n - 2)(n - 3) + (n - 2)/2. All cases unresolved in earlier works are covered here. In this article it is proved that in each set T(n,m) such that n >= 4 and 5 <= m <= n(n - 1)/2 there exists a unique LMRTTG, called G(n,m). A construction of G(n,m) is also given.

A two-terminal graph is a simple graph equipped with two distinguished vertices, called terminals. Let $T_{n,m}$ be the class consisting of all nonisomorphic two-terminal graphs on $n$ vertices and $m$ edges. Let $G$ be any two-terminal graph in $T_{n,m}$, and let $d$ be any positive integer. For each $ρ\in [0,1]$, the \emph{$d$-constrained two-terminal reliability of $G$ at $ρ$}, denoted $R_G^d(ρ)$, is the probability that $G$ has some path of length at most $d$ joining its terminals after each of its edges is independently deleted with probability $ρ$. We say $G$ is a \emph{$d$-uniformly most reliable two-terminal graph} ($d$-UMRTTG) if for each $H$ in $T_{n,m}$ and every $ρ\in [0,1]$ it holds that $R_{G}^d(ρ)\geq R_H^d(ρ)$. Previous works studied the existence of $d$-UMRTTG in $T_{n,m}$ when $d$ is greater than or equal to $n-1$, or equivalently, when the distance constraint is dropped. In this work, a characterization of all $1$-UMRTTGs and $2$-UMRTTGs is given. Then, it is proved that there exists a unique $3$-UMRTTG in $T_{n,m}$ when $n\geq 6$ and $5 \leq m \leq 2n-3$. Finally, for each $d\geq 4$ and each $n\geq 11$ it is proved that there is no $d$-UMRTTG in $T_{n,m}$ when $20 \leq m \leq 3n-9$ or when $3n-5 \leq m \leq \binom{n}{2}-2$.

A two-terminal graph is a graph equipped with two distinguished vertices, called terminals. Let $T_{n,m}$ be the set of all nonisomorphic connected simple two-terminal graphs on $n$ vertices and $m$ edges. Let $G$ be any two-terminal graph in $T_{n,m}$. For every number $p$ in $[0,1]$ we let each of the edges in $G$ be independently deleted with probability $1-p$. The split reliability $SR_{G}(p)$ is the probability that the resulting spanning subgraph has precisely $2$ connected components, each one including one terminal. The two-terminal graph $G$ is uniformly most split reliable if $SR_G(p)\geq SR_{H}(p)$ for each $H$ in $T_{n,m}$ and every $p$ in $[0,1]$. We say $G$ is locally most split reliable if there exists $δ>0$ such that $SR_G(p)\geq SR_{H}(p)$ for each $H$ in $T_{n,m}$ and every $p$ in $(1-δ,1)$. Brown and McMullin showed that there exists uniformly most split reliable graphs in each class $T_{n,m}$ such that $m=n-1$, $m=\binom{n}{2}$, or $m=\binom{n}{2}-1$. The authors also proved that there is no uniformly most split reliable two-terminal graph in $T_{n,n}$ when $n\geq 6$ and specified in which classes $T_{n,m}$ such that $n\leq 7$ there exist uniformly most split reliable graphs. The existence or nonexistence of uniformly most split reliable graphs in the remaining cases is posed by Brown and McMullin as an open problem. In this work, the set $\mathcal{G}_{n,m}$ consisting of all locally most split reliable graphs is characterized in each nonempty class $T_{n,m}$. It is proved that a graph in $T_{n,m}$ is locally most split reliable if and only if its split reliability equals that of the balloon graph equipped with two terminals whose distance equals its diameter. Finally, it is proved that there is no uniformly most split reliable graph in $T_{n,m}$ when $n\geq 7$ and $n\leq m \leq \binom{n-3}{2}+3$.

If $G$ is a simple graph and $ρ\in[0,1]$, the reliability $R_G(ρ)$ is the probability of $G$ being connected after each of its edges is removed independently with probability $ρ$. A simple graph $G$ is a \emph{uniformly most reliable graph} (UMRG) if $R_G(ρ)\geq R_H(ρ)$ for every $ρ\in[0,1]$ and every simple graph $H$ on the same number of vertices and edges as $G$. Boesch [J.\ Graph Theory 10 (1986), 339--352] conjectured that, if $n$ and $m$ are such that there exists a connected simple graph on $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, then there also exists a UMRG on the same number of vertices and edges. Some counterexamples to Boesch's conjecture were given by Kelmans, Myrvold et al., and Brown and Cox. It is known that Boesch's conjecture holds whenever the corank, defined as $c=m-n+1$, is at most $4$ (and the corresponding UMRGs are fully characterized). Ath and Sobel conjectured that Boesch's conjecture holds whenever the corank $c$ is between $5$ and $8$, provided the number of vertices is at least $2c-2$. In this work, we give an infinite family of counterexamples to Boesch's conjecture of corank $5$. These are the first reported counterexamples that attain the minimum possible corank. As a byproduct, the conjecture by Ath and Sobel is disproved.

Let $G$ be a connected simple graph on $n$ vertices and $m$ edges. Denote $N_{i}^{(j)}(G)$ the number of spanning subgraphs of $G$ having precisely $i$ edges and not more than $j$ connected components. The graph $G$ is \emph{strong} if $N_{i}^{j}(G)\geq N_{i}^{j}(H)$ for each pair of integers $i\in \{0,1,\ldots,m\}$ and $j\in \{1,2,\ldots,n\}$ and each connected simple graph $H$ on $n$ vertices and $m$ edges. The graph $G$ is \emph{Whitney-maximum} if for each connected simple graph $H$ on $n$ vertices and $m$ edges there exists a polynomial $P_H(x,y)$ with nonnegative coefficients such that $W_{G}(x,y)-W_H(x,y)=(1-xy)P_H(x,y)$, where $W_G$ and $W_H$ stand for the Whitney polynomial of $G$ and $H$. In this work it is proved that a graph is strong if and only if it is Whitney-maximum. Consequently, the $0$-element conjecture proposed by Boesch [J.\ Graph Theory 10 (1986), 339--352] is true when restricted to graph classes in which Whitney-maximum graphs exist.

If $G$ is a simple graph and $ρ\in[0,1]$, the reliability $R_G(ρ)$ is the probability of $G$ being connected after each of its edges is removed independently with probability $ρ$. A simple graph $G$ is a \emph{uniformly most reliable graph} (UMRG) if $R_G(ρ)\geq R_H(ρ)$ for every $ρ\in[0,1]$ and every simple graph $H$ on the same number of vertices and edges as $G$. Boesch [J.\ Graph Theory 10 (1986), 339--352] conjectured that, if $n$ and $m$ are such that there exists a connected simple graph on $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, then there also exists a UMRG on the same number of vertices and edges. Some counterexamples to Boesch's conjecture were given by Kelmans, Myrvold et al., and Brown and Cox. It is known that Boesch's conjecture holds whenever the corank, defined as $c=m-n+1$, is at most $4$ (and the corresponding UMRGs are fully characterized). Ath and Sobel conjectured that Boesch's conjecture holds whenever the corank $c$ is between $5$ and $8$, provided the number of vertices is at least $2c-2$. In this work, we give an infinite family of counterexamples to Boesch's conjecture of corank $5$. These are the first reported counterexamples that attain the minimum possible corank. As a byproduct, the conjecture by Ath and Sobel is disproved.

There is a vast literature focused on network reliability evaluation. In the last decades, reliability optimization has been also addressed. Frank Boesch in 1986 introduced the concept of uniformly most reliable graph (UMRG). Later, Boesch \emph{et al.} presented the first UMRGs and conjectured that some special subdivisions of the bipartite complete graph $K_{3,3}$, as well as the bipartite complete graph $K_{4,4}$, are UMRGs. Wang proved that the first conjecture is true. Wendy Myrvold confirmed that $K_{4,4}$ is also UMRG, by means of computational tests. However, thus far, there is no mathematical proof in the literature. A trivial cut is an edge-set that includes all the incident edges of a fixed node. In this article we describe a methodology to determine UMRGs based on bounding the number of trivial cuts. As a proof-of-concept it is proved that both $K_{3,3}$ and $K_{4,4}$ are UMRGs.

In classical network reliability analysis, the system under study is a network with perfect nodes but imperfect link, that fail stochastically and independently. There, the goal is to find the probability that the resulting random graph is connected, called \emph{reliability}. Although the exact reliability computation belongs to the class of $\mathcal{NP}$-Hard problems, the literature offers three exact methods for exact reliability computation, to know, Sum of Disjoint Products (SDPs), Inclusion-Exclusion and Factorization. Inspired in delay-sensitive applications in telecommunications, Héctor Cancela and Louis Petingi defined in 2001 the diameter-constrained reliability, where terminals are required to be connected by $d$ hops or less, being $d$ a positive integer, called diameter. Factorization theory in classical network reliability is a mature area. However, an extension to the diameter-constrained context requires at least the recognition of irrelevant links, and an extension of deletion-contraction formula. In this paper, we fully characterize the determination of irrelevant links. Diameter-constrained reliability invariants are presented, which, together with the recognition of irrelevant links, represent the building-blocks for a new factorization theory. The paper is closed with a discussion of trends for future work.