Papers by Paul Dorbec
10 paper(s) by this author
· All BibTeX
Patrolling cop vs omniscient robber
We study a variant of the classical Cops and Robbers game with one cop and one robber, in which the cop follows a fixed walk on the graph, a patrol, that is chosen before the game begins, while the robber is omniscient, he knows the entire patrol in advance. A capture occurs when the robber comes within a given radius of capture of the cop. This model arises naturally at the intersection of recent work on limited-visibility games and offline versions of pursuit-evasion problems.
By $\tildeρ{(G)}$ we denote the minimum radius of capture that the cop must have to always capture the robber on $G$ in this setting, under optimal play, where $G$ is a connected graph. We initiate a systematic study of this parameter for several graph classes. We determine the exact value of $\tildeρ{(G)}$ for trees, establish upper and lower bounds for grids, and analyze the parameter for various families of chordal graphs, including interval graphs and caterpillars. Along the way, we develop general tools and structural results that may be of independent interest for the study of pursuit-evasion games with predetermined patrols and limited information.
Cayley trees and increasing 1,2-trees: let's twist!
An increasing 1,2-tree is a labeled graph formed by starting with a vertex and then repeatedly attaching a leaf to a vertex or a triangle to an edge, the labeling of the vertices corresponding to the order in which the vertices are added. Equivalently, increasing 1,2-trees are connected chordal graphs of treewidth at most 2 labeled with a reversed perfect elimination ordering. We prove that this family is equinumerous with Cayley trees, which are unconstrained labeled trees. In particular, the number of triangles in an increasing 1,2-tree corresponds to the number of twists. A twist (also called improper edge) is an edge whose endpoint closer to vertex 1 has a greater label than some vertex in the subtree rooted at the other endpoint of the edge. We provide three proofs of this result, the rst being based on similar recursive decompositions, the second on the resolution of generating functions, and the third describing a bijection. Finally, we propose ecient random generators for these two combinatorial families.
An exploration of the balance game
The balance game is played on a graph $G$ by two players, Admirable (A) and Impish (I), who take turns selecting unlabeled vertices of $G$. Admirable labels the selected vertices by $0$ and Impish by $1$, and the resulting label on any edge is the sum modulo $2$ of the labels of the vertices incident to that edge. Let $e_0$ and $e_1$ denote the number of edges labeled by $0$ and $1$ after all the vertices are labeled. The discrepancy in the balance game is defined as $d = e_1 - e_0$. The two players have opposite goals: Admirable attempts to minimize the discrepancy $d$ while Impish attempts to maximize $d$. When (A) makes the first move in the game, the (A)-start game balance number, $b^A_g(G)$, is the value of $d$ when both players play optimally, and when (I) makes the first move in the game, the (I)-start game balance number, $b^I_g(G)$, is the value of $d$ when both players play optimally. Among other results, we show that if $G$ has order $n$, then $-\log_2(n) \le b^A_g(G) \le \frac{n}{2}$ if $n$ is even and $0 \le b^A_g(G) \le \frac{n}{2} + \log_2(n)$ if $n$ is odd. Moreover we show that $b^A_g(G) + b^I_g(\overline{G}) = \lfloor n/2 \rfloor$.
The 1/3-conjectures for domination in cubic graphs
A set S of vertices in a graph G is a dominating set of G if every vertex not in S is adjacent to a vertex in S . The domination number of G, denoted by $γ$(G), is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set in G. In a breakthrough paper in 2008, L{ö}wenstein and Rautenbach proved that if G is a cubic graph of order n and girth at least 83, then $γ$(G) $\le$ n/3. A natural question is if this girth condition can be lowered. The question gave birth to two 1/3-conjectures for domination in cubic graphs. The first conjecture, posed by Verstraete in 2010, states that if G is a cubic graph on n vertices with girth at least 6, then $γ$(G) $\le$ n/3. The second conjecture, first posed as a question by Kostochka in 2009, states that if G is a cubic, bipartite graph of order n, then $γ$(G) $\le$n/3. In this paper, we prove Verstraete's conjecture when there is no 7-cycle and no 8-cycle, and we prove the Kostochka's related conjecture for bipartite graphs when there is no 4-cycle and no 8-cycle.
Cutting Lemma and Union Lemma for the Domination Game
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
Two new techniques are introduced into the theory of the domination game. The cutting lemma bounds the game domination number of a partially dominated graph with the game domination number of suitably modified partially dominated graph. The union lemma bounds the S-game domination number of a disjoint union of paths using appropriate weighting functions. Using these tools a conjecture asserting that the so-called three legged spiders are game domination critical graphs is proved. An extended cutting lemma is also derived and all game domination critical trees on 18, 19, and 20 vertices are listed.
On the number of planar Eulerian orientations
Published in Europ. J. Combin. 65 (2017) 59-91
• View Publication
• BIB
The number of planar Eulerian maps with n edges is well-known to have a simple expression. But what is the number of planar Eulerian orientations with n edges? This problem appears to be difficult. To approach it, we define and count families of subsets and supersets of planar Eulerian orientations, indexed by an integer k, that converge to the set of all planar Eulerian orientations as k increases. The generating functions of our subsets can be characterized by systems of polynomial equations, and are thus algebraic. The generating functions of our supersets are characterized by polynomial systems involving divided differences, as often occurs in map enumeration. We prove that these series are algebraic as well. We obtain in this way lower and upper bounds on the growth rate of planar Eulerian orientations, which appears to be around 12.5.
Heredity for generalized power domination
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
In this paper, we study the behaviour of the generalized power domination number of a graph by small changes on the graph, namely edge and vertex deletion and edge contraction. We prove optimal bounds for $γ\_{p,k}(G-e)$, $γ\_{p,k}(G/e)$ and for $γ\_{p,k}(G-v)$ in terms of $γ\_{p,k}(G)$, and give examples for which these bounds are tight. We characterize all graphs for which $γ\_{p,k}(G-e) = γ\_{p,k}(G)+1$ for any edge $e$. We also consider the behaviour of the propagation radius of graphs by similar modifications.
Complexity of the Game Domination Problem
The game domination number is a graph invariant that arises from a game, which is related to graph domination in a similar way as the game chromatic number is related to graph coloring. In this paper we show that verifying whether the game domination number of a graph is bounded by a given integer is PSPACE-complete. This contrasts the situation of the game coloring problem whose complexity is still unknown.
Ice sliding games
Published
• View Publication
• BIB
This paper deals with sliding games, which are a variant of the better known pushpush game. On a given structure (grid, torus...), a robot can move in a specific set of directions, and stops when it hits a block or boundary of the structure. The objective is to place the minimum number of blocks such that the robot can visit all the possible positions of the structure. In particular, we give the exact value of this number when playing on a rectangular grid and a torus. Other variants of this game are also considered, by constraining the robot to stop on each case, or by replacing blocks by walls.
Domination game: effect of edge- and vertex-removal
The domination game is played on a graph $G$ by two players, named Dominator and Staller. They alternatively select vertices of $G$ such that each chosen vertex enlarges the set of vertices dominated before the move on it. Dominator's goal is that the game is finished as soon as possible, while Staller wants the game to last as long as possible. It is assumed that both play optimally. Game 1 and Game 2 are variants of the game in which Dominator and Staller has the first move, respectively. The game domination number $γ_g(G)$, and the Staller-start game domination number $γ_g'(G)$, is the number of vertices chosen in Game 1 and Game 2, respectively. It is proved that if $e\in E(G)$, then $|γ_g(G) - γ_g(G-e)| \le 2$ and $|γ_g'(G) - γ_g'(G-e)| \le 2$, and that each of the possibilities here is realizable by connected graphs $G$ for all values of $γ_g(G)$ and $γ_g'(G)$ larger than 5. For the remaining small values it is either proved that realizations are not possible or realizing examples are provided. It is also proved that if $v\in V(G)$, then $γ_g(G) - γ_g(G-v) \le 2$ and $γ_g'(G) - γ_g'(G-v) \le 2$. Possibilities here are again realizable by connected graphs $G$ in almost all the cases, the exceptional values are treated similarly as in the edge-removal case.