arXiv++ Combinatorics

We say a family of sets is intersecting if any two of its sets intersect, and we say it is trivially intersecting if there is an element which appears in every set of the family. In this paper we study the maximum size of a non-trivially intersecting family in a natural "multi-part" setting. Here the ground set is divided into parts, and one considers families of sets whose intersection with each part is of a prescribed size. Our work is motivated by classical results in the single-part setting due to Erdős, Ko and Rado, and Hilton and Milner, and by a theorem of Frankl concerning intersecting families in this multi-part setting. In the case where the part sizes are sufficiently large we determine the maximum size of a non-trivially intersecting multi-part family, disproving a conjecture of Alon and Katona.

A family $\mathcal A$ of subsets of an $n$-element set is called an eventown (resp. oddtown) if all its sets have even (resp. odd) size and all pairwise intersections have even size. Using tools from linear algebra, it was shown by Berlekamp and Graver that the maximum size of an eventown is $2^{\left\lfloor n/2\right\rfloor}$. On the other hand (somewhat surprisingly), it was proven by Berlekamp, that oddtowns have size at most $n$. Over the last four decades, many extensions of this even/oddtown problem have been studied. In this paper we present new results on two such extensions. First, extending a result of Vu, we show that a $k$-wise eventown (i.e., intersections of $k$ sets are even) has for $k \geq 3$ a unique extremal configuration and obtain a stability result for this problem. Next we improve some known bounds for the defect version of an $\ell$-oddtown problem. In this problem we consider sets of size $\not\equiv 0 \pmod \ell$ where $\ell$ is a prime number $\ell$ (not necessarily $2$) and allow a few pairwise intersections to also have size $\not\equiv 0 \pmod \ell$.

We introduce a new setting of algorithmic problems in random graphs, studying the minimum number of queries one needs to ask about the adjacency between pairs of vertices of ${\mathcal G}(n,p)$ in order to typically find a subgraph possessing a given target property. We show that if $p\geq \frac{\ln n+\ln\ln n+ω(1)}{n}$, then one can find a Hamilton cycle with high probability after exposing $(1+o(1))n$ edges. Our result is tight in both $p$ and the number of exposed edges.

We discuss a new algorithmic type of problem in random graphs studying the minimum number of queries one has to ask about adjacency between pairs of vertices of a random graph $G\sim {\mathcal G}(n,p)$ in order to find a subgraph which possesses some target property with high probability. In this paper we focus on finding long paths in $G\sim \mathcal G(n,p)$ when $p=\frac{1+\varepsilon}{n}$ for some fixed constant $\varepsilon>0$. This random graph is known to have typically linearly long paths. To have $\ell$ edges with high probability in $G\sim \mathcal G(n,p)$ one clearly needs to query at least $Ω\left(\frac{\ell}{p}\right)$ pairs of vertices. Can we find a path of length $\ell$ economically, i.e., by querying roughly that many pairs? We argue that this is not possible and one needs to query significantly more pairs. We prove that any randomised algorithm which finds a path of length $\ell=Ω\left(\frac{\log\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)}{\varepsilon}\right)$ with at least constant probability in $G\sim \mathcal G(n,p)$ with $p=\frac{1+\varepsilon}{n}$ must query at least $Ω\left(\frac{\ell}{p\varepsilon \log\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)}\right)$ pairs of vertices. This is tight up to the $\log\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right)$ factor.

A classic theorem in combinatorial design theory is Fisher's inequality, which states that a family $\mathcal F$ of subsets of $[n]$ with all pairwise intersections of size $λ$ can have at most $n$ non-empty sets. One may weaken the condition by requiring that for every set in $\mathcal F$, all but at most $k$ of its pairwise intersections have size $λ$. We call such families $k$-almost $λ$-Fisher. Vu was the first to study the maximum size of such families, proving that for $k=1$ the largest family has $2n-2$ sets, and characterising when equality is attained. We substantially refine his result, showing how the size of the maximum family depends on $λ$. In particular we prove that for small $λ$ one essentially recovers Fisher's bound. We also solve the next open case of $k=2$ and obtain the first non-trivial upper bound for general $k$.