arXiv++ Combinatorics

We study the inhomogeneous random graph with preferential attachment kernel and degree distribution with power-law exponent $τ\in(2,3)$ as a representative of the class of graphs of preferential attachment type with infinite variance degrees. Under bond percolation with a positive retention probability independent of the size $n$ of the graph there is a unique macroscopic component with high probability. We therefore investigate percolation probabilities $p_n\downarrow0$. We identify a moving critical window at $p_c \sim βn^{(τ-3)/(2τ-2)}$. Above this window, when $p_n \gg p_c$, the maximal component has size of order $n p^{_{(τ-1)/(3-τ)}}_{_n}$ and it is unique. Below this window, when $n^{1/(1-τ)} \ll p_n \ll p_c$, it is non-unique, star-shaped and has size of order $n^{1/(τ-1)} p_n$. In the critical window itself, the largest component scaled by $\sqrt{n}$ converges in distribution to a positive random variable with a law given in terms of a subcritical Norros-Reittu graph. This behaviour is markedly different from that seen for other classes of scale-free graphs and is conjectured to persist throughout the broad class of growing graphs with infinite variance.

We identify the size of the largest connected component in a subcritical inhomogeneous random graph with a kernel of preferential attachment type. The component is polynomial in the graph size with an explicitly given exponent, which is strictly larger than the exponent for the largest degree in the graph. This is in stark contrast to the behaviour of inhomogeneous random graphs with a kernel of rank one. Our proof uses local approximation by branching random walks going well beyond the weak local limit and novel results on subcritical killed branching random walks.

Suppose $n$ different pairs of socks are put in a tumble dryer. When the dryer is finished socks are taken out one by one, if a sock matches one of the socks on the sorting table both are removed, otherwise it is put on the table until its partner emerges from the dryer. We note the number of socks on the table after each of the $2n$ socks is taken from the dryer and give an explicit formula for the probability that this sequence equals a given sequence of length $2n$.

Finding the most powerful node in a dynamic random network, the largest set in a partition-valued stochastic process, or the largest family in an evolving population at a given time, can be a very difficult problem. This is particularly the case when the underlying stochastic process has complex dependencies and the individual strength of an object has an impact that only plays out over time. We propose a novel technique to deal with such problems and show how it can be applied to a broad range of examples where it produces new insight and surprising results. The method relies on two steps: In the first step, which is highly problem dependent, the problem is embedded into continuous time so that the evolution of the sizes of objects after their individual birth times become approximately independent while we only need minimal control over the birth times themselves. Once such an embedding is achieved, the second step is to apply a Poisson limit theorem that allows a comparison of object sizes in a critical window and therefore allows a description of features of extremal objects. In this paper we prove such a versatile limit theorem, based on extreme value theory, and show how the technique can be used to study extremal behaviour in different types of preferential attachment networks with fitness, branching processes with selection and mutation, and random permutations with random cycle weights.

We study the contact process in the regime of small infection rates on finite scale-free networks with stationary dynamics based on simultaneous updating of all connections of a vertex. We allow the update rates of individual vertices to increase with the strength of a vertex, leading to a fast evolution of the network. We first develop an approach for inhomogeneous networks with general kernel and then focus on two canonical cases, the factor kernel and the preferential attachment kernel. For these specific networks we identify and analyse four possible strategies how the infection can survive for a long time. We show that there is fast extinction of the infection when neither of the strategies is successful, otherwise there is slow extinction and the most successful strategy determines the asymptotics of the metastable density as the infection rate goes to zero. We identify the domains in which these strategies dominate in terms of phase diagrams for the exponent describing the decay of the metastable density.

Scale-free networks with small power law exponent are known to be robust, meaning that their qualitative topological structure cannot be altered by random removal of even a large proportion of nodes. By contrast, it has been argued in the science literature that such networks are highly vulnerable to a targeted attack, and removing a small number of key nodes in the network will dramatically change the topological structure. Here we analyse a class of preferential attachment networks in the robust regime and prove four main results supporting this claim: After removal of an arbitrarily small proportion epsilon>0 of the oldest nodes (1) the asymptotic degree distribution has exponential instead of power law tails; (2) the largest degree in the network drops from being of the order of a power of the network size n to being just logarithmic in n; (3) the typical distances in the network increase from order log log n to order log n; and (4) the network becomes vulnerable to random removal of nodes. Importantly, all our results explicitly quantify the dependence on the proportion epsilon of removed vertices. For example, we show that the critical proportion of nodes that have to be retained for survival of the giant component undergoes a steep increase as epsilon moves away from zero, and a comparison of this result with similar ones for other networks reveals the existence of two different universality classes of robust network models. The key technique in our proofs is a local approximation of the network by a branching random walk with two killing boundaries, and an understanding of the particle genealogies in this process, which enters into estimates for the spectral radius of an associated operator.

We define a class of growing networks in which new nodes are given a spatial position and are connected to existing nodes with a probability mechanism favoring short distances and high degrees. The competition of preferential attachment and spatial clustering gives this model a range of interesting properties. Empirical degree distributions converge to a limit law, which can be a power law with any exponent $τ>2$. The average clustering coefficient of the networks converges to a positive limit. Finally, a phase transition occurs in the global clustering coefficients and empirical distribution of edge lengths when the power-law exponent crosses the critical value $τ=3$. Our main tool in the proof of these results is a general weak law of large numbers in the spirit of Penrose and Yukich.

We show that in preferential attachment models with power-law exponent $τ\in(2,3)$ the distance between randomly chosen vertices in the giant component is asymptotically equal to $(4+o(1))\, \frac{\log\log N}{-\log (τ-2)}$, where $N$ denotes the number of nodes. This is twice the value obtained for several types of configuration models with the same power-law exponent. The extra factor reveals the different structure of typical shortest paths in preferential attachment graphs.

We define a dynamic model of random networks, where new vertices are connected to old ones with a probability proportional to a sublinear function of their degree. We first give a strong limit law for the empirical degree distribution, and then have a closer look at the temporal evolution of the degrees of individual vertices, which we describe in terms of large and moderate deviation principles. Using these results, we expose an interesting phase transition: in cases of strong preference of large degrees, eventually a single vertex emerges forever as vertex of maximal degree, whereas in cases of weak preference, the vertex of maximal degree is changing infinitely often. Loosely speaking, the transition between the two phases occurs in the case when a new edge is attached to an existing vertex with a probability proportional to the root of its current degree.