arXiv++ Combinatorics

Combinatorial Game Theory(CGT)is a branch of Game Theory that has developed largely independently of Economic Game Theory (EGT), and is concerned with deep mathematical properties of two-player zero-sum games recursively defined over various combinatorial structures. The aim of this work is to lay the foundations for bridging the conceptual and technical gaps between CGT and EGT, here interpreted as multiplayer Extensive Form Games, so that they can be treated within a unified framework. More specifically, we introduce a class of $n$-player, general-sum games, called {\sc Cumulative Games}, which can be analyzed using tools from both CGT and EGT. We show how two of the most fundamental definitions of CGT, the outcome function and the disjunctive sum operator, naturally extend to the class of {\sc Cumulative Games}. The outcome function allows for efficient equilibrium computation under certain restrictions, while the disjunctive sum operator lets us define a partial order over games according to the advantage that a given player has. Finally, we show that any Extensive Form Game can be written as a {\sc Cumulative Game}.

We study zero-sum games, a variant of the classical combinatorial Subtraction games (studied for example in the monumental work "Winning Ways", by Berlekamp, Conway and Guy), called Cumulative Subtraction (CS). Two players alternate in moving, and get points for taking pebbles out of a joint pile. We prove that the outcome in optimal play (game value) of a CS with a finite number of possible actions is eventually periodic, with period $2s$, where $s$ is the size of the largest available action. This settles a conjecture by Stewart in his Ph.D. thesis (2011). Specifically, we find a quadratic bound, in the size of $s$, on when the outcome function must have become periodic. In case of two possible actions, we give an explicit description of optimal play. We generalize the periodicity result to games with a so-called reward function, where at each stage of game, the change of `score' does not necessarily equal the number of pebbles you collect.

Graph minors are a primary tool in understanding the structure of undirected graphs, with many conceptual and algorithmic implications. We propose new variants of \emph{directed graph minors} and \emph{directed graph embeddings}, by modifying familiar definitions. For the class of 2-terminal directed acyclic graphs (TDAGs) our two definitions coincide, and the class is closed under both operations. The usefulness of our directed minor operations is demonstrated by characterizing all TDAGs with serial-parallel width at most $k$; a class of networks known to guarantee bounded negative externality in nonatomic routing games. Our characterization implies that a TDAG has serial-parallel width of $1$ if and only if it is a directed series-parallel graph. We also study the computational complexity of finding a directed minor and computing the serial-parallel width.