arXiv++ Combinatorics

A graph $G$ is called $CIS$ if each maximal clique intersects each maximal stable set of $G$, with maximality taken with respect to set inclusion. CIS graphs resemble perfect graphs in several respects and have interesting applications in game theory. The complexity of recognizing CIS graphs was posed as an open problem by Chvátal in the 1990s and has since led to conflicting conjectures. We settle the problem by showing that recognizing CIS graphs is $\mathsf{coNP}\text{-complete}$.

Let $G=(V,E)$ be a graph with four distinguished vertices, two sources $s_1, s_2$ and two sinks $t_1,t_2$, let $c:\, E \rightarrow \mathbb Z_+$ be a capacity function, and let ${\cal P}$ be the set of all simple paths in $G$ from $s_1$ to $t_1$ or from $s_2$ to $t_2$. A biflow (or $2$-commodity flow) in $G$ is an assignment $f:\, {\cal P}\rightarrow \mathbb R_+$ such that $\sum_{e \in Q \in {\cal P}}\, f(Q) \le c(e)$ for all $e \in E$, whose value is defined to be $\sum_{Q \in {\cal P}}\, f(Q)$. A bicut in $G$ is a subset $K$ of $E$ that contains at least one edge from each member of ${\cal P}$, whose capacity is $\sum_{e\in K}\, c(e)$. In 1977 Seymour characterized, in terms of forbidden structures, all graphs $G$ for which the max-biflow (integral) min-bicut theorem holds true (that is, the maximum value of an integral biflow is equal to the minimum capacity of a bicut for every capacity function $c$); such a graph $G$ is referred to as a Seymour graph. Nevertheless, his proof is not algorithmic in nature. In this paper we present a combinatorial polynomial-time algorithm for finding maximum integral biflows in Seymour graphs, which relies heavily on a structural description of such graphs.