arXiv++ Combinatorics

The betweenness function $bet(n)$ is the minimum number of total orderings of $n$ objects such that for any three distinct objects $a$, $b$ and $c$, there is an ordering in which $b$ is between $a$ and $c$. The nonbetweenness function $nbet(n)$ is the minimum number of total orderings such that for any three distinct objects $a$, $b$ and $c$, there is an ordering in which $b$ is not between $a$ and $c$. We show that $nbet(n) = \left\lceil \log_2\log_2n \right\rceil+1$ and $bet(n) = Θ(\log n)$. Betweenness and Nonbetweenness are specific cases of a more general extreme value function called the `extreme ternary constraint function'. The asymptotic value of this generalisation is computed using the values of $nbet(n)$ and $bet(n)$. This result demonstrates that the minimum size of a set of rooted phylogenetic trees is consistent with all phylogenetic triplets is $Θ(\log\log n)$.

For a given number of colours, $s$, the guessing number of a graph is the base $s$ logarithm of the size of the largest family of colourings of the vertex set of the graph such that the colour of each vertex can be determined from the colours of the vertices in its neighbourhood. An upper bound for the guessing number of the $n$-vertex cycle graph $C_n$ is $n/2$. It is known that the guessing number equals $n/2$ whenever $n$ is even or $s$ is a perfect square \cite{Christofides2011guessing}. We show that, for any given integer $s\geq 2$, if $a$ is the largest factor of $s$ less than or equal to $\sqrt{s}$, for sufficiently large odd $n$, the guessing number of $C_n$ with $s$ colours is $(n-1)/2 + \log_s(a)$. This answers a question posed by Christofides and Markström in 2011 \cite{Christofides2011guessing}. We also present an explicit protocol which achieves this bound for every $n$. Linking this to index coding with side information, we deduce that the information defect of $C_n$ with $s$ colours is $(n+1)/2 - \log_s(a)$ for sufficiently large odd $n$. Our results are a generalisation of the $s=2$ case which was proven in \cite{bar2011index}.

Three standard subtree transfer operations for binary trees, used in particular for phylogenetic trees, are: tree bisection and reconnection ($TBR$), subtree prune and regraft ($SPR$) and rooted subtree prune and regraft ($rSPR$). For a pair of leaf-labelled binary trees with $n$ leaves, the maximum number of such moves required to transform one into the other is $n-Θ(\sqrt{n})$, extending a result of Ding, Grunewald and Humphries. We show that if the pair is chosen uniformly at random, then the expected number of moves required to transfer one into the other is $n-Θ(n^{2/3})$. These results may be phrased in terms of agreement forests: we also give extensions for more than two binary trees.