arXiv++ Combinatorics

We determine the rank of a random matrix over an arbitrary field with prescribed numbers of non-zero entries in each row and column. As an application we obtain a formula for the rate of low-density parity check codes. This formula vindicates a conjecture of Lelarge (2013). The proofs are based on coupling arguments and a novel random perturbation, applicable to any matrix, that diminishes the number of short linear relations.

Partly on the basis of heuristic arguments from physics it has been suggested that the performance of certain types of algorithms on random $k$-SAT formulas is linked to phase transitions that affect the geometry of the set of satisfying assignments. But beyond intuition there has been scant rigorous evidence that "practical" algorithms are affected by these phase transitions. In this paper we prove that \walksat, a popular randomised satisfiability algorithm, fails on random $k$-SAT formulas not very far above clause/variable density where the set of satisfying assignments shatters into tiny, well-separated clusters. Specifically, we prove \walksat\ is ineffective with high probability if $m/n>c2^k\ln^2k/k$, where $m$ is the number of clauses, $n$ is the number of variables and $c>0$ is an absolute constant. By comparison, \walksat\ is known to find satisfying assignments in linear time \whp\ if $m/n<c'2^k/k$ for another constant $c'>0$ [Coja-Oghlan and Frieze, SIAM J.\ Computing 2014].

Let $\varPhi$ be a uniformly distributed random $k$-SAT formula with $n$ variables and $m$ clauses. For clauses/variables ratio $m/n \leq r_{k\text{-SAT}} \sim 2^k\ln2$ the formula $\varPhi$ is satisfiable with high probability. However, no efficient algorithm is known to provably find a satisfying assignment beyond $m/n \sim 2k \ln(k)/k$ with a non-vanishing probability. Non-rigorous statistical mechanics work on $k$-CNF led to the development of a new efficient "message passing algorithm" called \emph{Survey Propagation Guided Decimation} [Mézard et al., Science 2002]. Experiments conducted for $k=3,4,5$ suggest that the algorithm finds satisfying assignments close to $r_{k\text{-SAT}}$. However, in the present paper we prove that the basic version of Survey Propagation Guided Decimation fails to solve random $k$-SAT formulas efficiently already for $m/n=2^k(1+\varepsilon_k)\ln(k)/k$ with $\lim_{k\to\infty}\varepsilon_k= 0$ almost a factor $k$ below $r_{k\text{-SAT}}$.

A hypergraph $H$ is called universal for a family $\mathcal{F}$ of hypergraphs, if it contains every hypergraph $F \in \mathcal{F}$ as a copy. For the family of $r$-uniform hypergraphs with maximum vertex degree bounded by $Δ$ and at most $n$ vertices any universal hypergraph has to contain $Ω(n^{r-r/Δ})$ many edges. We exploit constructions of Alon and Capalbo to obtain universal $r$-uniform hypergraphs with the optimal number of edges $O(n^{r-r/Δ})$ when $r$ is even, $r \mid Δ$ or $Δ=2$. Further we generalize the result of Alon and Asodi about optimal universal graphs for the family of graphs with at most $m$ edges and no isolated vertices to hypergraphs.

Based on a non-rigorous formalism called the "cavity method", physicists have put forward intriguing predictions on phase transitions in discrete structures. One of the most remarkable ones is that in problems such as random $k$-SAT or random graph $k$-coloring, very shortly before the threshold for the existence of solutions there occurs another phase transition called "condensation" [Krzakala et al., PNAS 2007]. The existence of this phase transition appears to be intimately related to the difficulty of proving precise results on, e.g., the $k$-colorability threshold as well as to the performance of message passing algorithms. In random graph $k$-coloring, there is a precise conjecture as to the location of the condensation phase transition in terms of a distributional fixed point problem. In this paper we prove this conjecture for $k$ exceeding a certain constant $k_0$.

Let G(n,d) be the random d-regular graph on n vertices. For any integer k exceeding a certain constant k_0 we identify a number d_{k-col} such that G(n,d) is k-colorable w.h.p. if d<d_{k-col} and non-k-colorable w.h.p. if d>d_{k-col}.