arXiv++ Combinatorics

In the Maker-Breaker resolving game, two players named Resolver and Spoiler alternately select unplayed vertices of a given graph $G$. The aim of Resolver is to select all the vertices of some resolving set of $G$, while Spoiler aims to select at least one vertex from every resolving set of $G$. In this paper, this game is investigated on the lexicographic product of graphs. It is proved that if Spoiler has a winning strategy on a graph $H$ no matter who starts the game, or if the first player has a winning strategy on $H$, then Spoiler always has a winning strategy on $G\circ H$. Special attention is paid to lexicographic products in which the second factor is either complete, or a path, or a cycle. For instance, in $G\circ P_{2\ell}$ and in $G\circ C_{2\ell}$, Resolver always wins, while in $G\circ P_{2\ell+1}$ and in $G\circ C_{2\ell+1}$ the same conclusion holds provided $G$ is free from false twins. On the other hand, Spoiler always wins on $G\circ P_5$. In most of the cases, the corresponding Maker-Breaker resolving number is also determined.

The Maker-Breaker resolving game is a game played on a graph $G$ by Resolver and Spoiler. The players taking turns alternately in which each player selects a not yet played vertex of $G$. The goal of Resolver is to select all the vertices in a resolving set of $G$, while that of Spoiler is to prevent this from happening. The outcome $o(G)$ of the game played is one of $\mathcal{R}$, $\mathcal{S}$, and $\mathcal{N}$, where $o(G)=\mathcal{R}$ (resp.\ $o(G)=\mathcal{S}$), if Resolver (resp.\ Spoiler) has a winning strategy no matter who starts the game, and $o(G)=\mathcal{N}$, if the first player has a winning strategy. In this paper, the game is investigated on corona products $G\odot H$ of graphs $G$ and $H$. It is proved that if $o(H)\in\{\mathcal{N}, \mathcal{S}\}$, then $o(G\odot H) = \mathcal{S}$. No such result is possible under the assumption $o(H) = \mathcal{R}$. It is proved that $o(G\odot P_k) = \mathcal{S}$ if $k=5$, otherwise $o(G\odot P_k) = \mathcal{R}$, and that $o(G\odot C_k) = \mathcal{S}$ if $k=3$, otherwise $o(G\odot C_k) = \mathcal{R}$. Several results are also given on corona products in which the second factor is of diameter at most $2$.