arXiv++ Combinatorics

The profile-based matching problem is the problem of finding a matching that optimizes profile from an instance $(G, r, \langle u_1, \dots, u_r \rangle)$, where $G$ is a bipartite graph $(A \cup B, E)$, $r$ is the number of utility functions, and $u_i: E \to \{ 0, 1, \dots, U_i \}$ is utility functions for $1 \le i \le r$. A matching is optimal if the matching maximizes the sum of the 1st utility, subject to this, maximizes the sum of the 2nd utility, and so on. The profile-based matching can express rank-maximal matching \cite{irving2006rank}, fair matching \cite{huang2016fair}, and weight-maximal matching \cite{huang2012weight}. These problems can be reduced to maximum weight matching problems, but the reduction is known to be inefficient due to the huge weights. This paper presents the condition for a weight function to find an optimal matching by reducing profile-based matching to the maximum weight matching problem. It is shown that a weight function which represents utilities as a mixed-radix numeric system with base-$(2U_i+1)$ can be used, so the complexity of the problem is $O(m\sqrt{n}(\log{n} + \sum_{i=1}^{r}\log{U_i}))$ for $n = |V|$, $m = |E|$. In addition, it is demonstrated that the weight lower bound for rank-maximal/fair/weight-maximal matching, better computational complexity for fair/weight-maximal matching, and an algorithm to verify a maximum weight matching can be reduced to rank-maximal matching. Finally, the effectiveness of the profile-based algorithm is evaluated with real data for school choice lottery.

Many countries around the world, including Korea, use the school choice lottery system. However, this method has a problem in that many students are assigned to less-preferred schools based on the lottery results. In addition, the task of finding a good assignment with ties often has a time complexity of NP, making it a very difficult problem to improve the quality of the assignment. In this paper, we prove that the problem of finding a stable matching that maximizes the student-oriented preference utility in a two-sided market with one-sided preference can be solved in polynomial time, and we verify through experiments that the quality of assignment is improved. The main contributions of this paper are as follows. We found that stable student-oriented allocation in a two-sided market with one-sided preferences is the same as stable allocation in a two-sided market with symmetric preferences. In addition, we defined a method to quantify the quality of allocation from a preference utilitarian perspective. Based on the above two, it was proven that the problem of finding a stable match that maximizes the preference utility in a two-sided market with homogeneous preferences can be reduced to an allocation problem. In this paper, through an experiment, we quantitatively verified that optimal student assignment assigns more students to schools of higher preference, even in situations where many students are assigned to schools of low preference using the existing assignment method.