arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let $A_q(n,d)$ denote the largest size of a code of length $n$ and minimum Hamming distance $d$ over an alphabet of $q$ symbols. For fixed $q\ge2$ and $d\ge4$ we construct codes with redundancy $n-\log_q A_q(n,d)\le(d-3)\log_q n+O(\sqrt{\log n})$ for all large $n$. No algebraic structure is imposed on the alphabet, and the codes are not linear. For $d=4$ and $d=5$ the coefficient of $\log_q n$ matches the Hamming bound, so the redundancy is determined up to lower-order terms. At distance four the codes are provably better than every linear code: by the polynomial-method bound for cap sets, $\mathbb{F}_q$-linear codes with $q>2$ require a strictly larger coefficient in front of $\log_q n$. The construction imposes moment checksums over an auxiliary finite field, as BCH codes do, but one fewer than the distance would normally require. The affine-line theorem from prior work describes the dependencies left by these checks. We exclude them by placing the code positions inside a specially structured subset of the field, built from Behrend's sphere construction with the help of algebraic number theory.

Large pools of synthetic DNA molecules have been recently used to reliably store significant volumes of digital data. While DNA as a storage medium has enormous potential because of its high storage density, its practical use is currently severely limited because of the high cost and low throughput of available DNA synthesis technologies. We study the role of batch optimization in reducing the cost of large scale DNA synthesis, which translates to the following algorithmic task. Given a large pool $\mathcal{S}$ of random quaternary strings of fixed length, partition $\mathcal{S}$ into batches in a way that minimizes the sum of the lengths of the shortest common supersequences across batches. We introduce two ideas for batch optimization that both improve (in different ways) upon a naive baseline: (1) using both $(ACGT)^{*}$ and its reverse $(TGCA)^{*}$ as reference strands, and batching appropriately, and (2) batching via the quantiles of an appropriate ordering of the strands. We also prove asymptotically matching lower bounds on the cost of DNA synthesis, showing that one cannot improve upon these two ideas. Our results uncover a surprising separation between two cases that naturally arise in the context of DNA data storage: the asymptotic cost savings of batch optimization are significantly greater in the case where strings in $\mathcal{S}$ do not contain repeats of the same character (homopolymers), as compared to the case where strings in $\mathcal{S}$ are unconstrained.

We show that for any set A in a finite Abelian group G that has at least c |A|^3 solutions to a_1 + a_2 = a_3 + a_4, where a_i belong A there exist sets A' in A and L in G, |L| \ll c^{-1} log |A| such that A' is contained in Span of L and A' has approximately c |A|^3 solutions to a'_1 + a'_2 = a'_3 + a'_4, where a'_i belong A'. We also study so-called symmetric sets or, in other words, sets of large values of convolution.