arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let $c$ and $c'$ be edge or vertex colourings of a graph $G$. We say that $c'$ is less symmetric than $c$ if the stabiliser (in $\operatorname{Aut} G$) of $c'$ is contained in the stabiliser of $c$. We show that if $G$ is not a bicentred tree, then for every vertex colouring of $G$ there is a less symmetric edge colouring with the same number of colours. On the other hand, if $T$ is a tree, then for every edge colouring there is a less symmetric vertex colouring with the same number of edges. Our results can be used to characterise those graphs whose distinguishing index is larger than their distinguishing number.

If a graph $G$ has distinguishing number 2, then there exists a partition of its vertex set into two parts, such that no nontrivial automorphism of $G$ fixes setwise the two parts. Such a partition is called a 2-distinguishing coloring of $G$, and the parts are called its color classes. If $G$ admits such a coloring, it is often possible to find another in which one of the color classes is sparse in a certain sense. In this case we say that $G$ has 2-distinguishing density zero. An extreme example of this would be an infinite graph admitting a 2-distinguishing coloring in which one of the color classes is finite. If a graph $G$ contains a vertex $v$ such that, for all $n \in \mathbb N$, any two distinct vertices equidistant from $v$ have nonequal $n$-spheres, then we say that $G$ satisfies the Distinct Spheres Condition. In this paper we prove a general result: any countable connected graph that satisfies the Distinct Spheres Condition is 2-distinguishable with density zero. We present two proofs of this, one that uses a deterministic coloring, and another (that applies only to locally finite graphs) using a random coloring. From this result, we deduce that several important families of countably infinite and connected graphs are 2-distinguishable with density zero, including those that are locally finite and primitive. Furthermore, we prove that any connected graph with infinite motion and subquadratic growth is 2-distinguishable with density zero.

This note presents a new, elementary proof of a generalization of a theorem of Halin to graphs with unbounded degrees, which is then applied to show that every connected, countably infinite graph G with a subdegree-finite, infinite automorphism group whose cardinality is strictly less than continuum, has a finite set F of vertices that is setwise stabilized only by the identity automorphism. A bound on the size of such sets, which are called distinguishing, is also provided. To put this theorem of Halin and its generalization into perspective, we also discuss several related non-elementary, independent results and their methods of proof.

We introduce a new product for permutation groups. It takes as input two permutation groups, M and N, and produces an infinite group M [X] N which carries many of the permutational properties of M. Under mild conditions on M and N the group M [X] N is simple. As a permutational product, its most significant property is the following: M [X] N is primitive if and only if M is primitive but not regular, and N is transitive. Despite this remarkable similarity with the wreath product in product action, M [X] N and M Wr N are thoroughly dissimilar. The product provides a general way to build exotic examples of non-discrete, simple, totally disconnected, locally compact, compactly generated topological groups from discrete groups. We use this to solve a well-known open problem from topological group theory, by obtaining the first construction of uncountably many pairwise non-isomorphic simple topological groups that are totally disconnected, locally compact, compactly generated and non-discrete. The groups we construct all contain the same compact open subgroup. To build the product, we describe a group U(M,N) that acts on an edge-transitive biregular tree T. This group has a natural universal property and is analogous to the iconic universal group construction of M. Burger and S. Mozes for locally finite regular trees.

A group A acting faithfully on a set X is 2-distinguishable if there is a 2-coloring of X that is not preserved by any nonidentity element of A, equivalently, if there is a proper subset of X with trivial setwise stabilizer. The motion of an element a in A is the number of points of X that are moved by a, and the motion of the group A is the minimal motion of its nonidentity elements. For finite A, the Motion Lemma says that if the motion of A is large enough (specifically at least 2 log_2 |A|), then the action is 2-distinguishable. For many situations where X has a combinatorial or algebraic structure, the Motion Lemma implies the action of Aut(X) on X is 2-distinguishable in all but finitely many instances. We prove an infinitary version of the Motion Lemma for countably infinite permutation groups, which states that infinite motion is large enough to guarantee 2-distinguishability. From this we deduce a number of results, including the fact that every locally finite, connected graph whose automorphism group is countably infinite is 2-distinguishable. One cannot extend the Motion Lemma to uncountable permutation groups, but nonetheless we prove that 2-distinguishable permutation groups with infinite motion are dense in the class of groups with infinite motion. We conjecture an extension of the Motion Lemma which we expect holds for a restricted class of uncountable permutation groups, and we conclude with a list of open questions. The consequences of our results are drawn for orbit equivalence of infinite permutation groups.

A group of permutations G of a set V is k-distinguishable if there exists a partition of V into k parts such that only the identity permutation in G fixes setwise all of the cells of the partition. The least cardinal number k such that (G,V) is k-distinguishable is its distinguishing number. In particular, a graph X is k-distinguishable if its automorphism group Aut(X) has distinguishing number at most k in its action on the vertices of X. Various results in the literature demonstrate that when an infinite graph fails to have some property, then often some finite subgraph is similarly deficient. In this paper we show that whenever an infinite connected graph X is not k-distinguishable (for a given cardinal k), then it contains a ball B of finite radius whose distinguishing number is at least k. Moreover, this lower bound cannot be sharpened, since for any integer k greater than 3 there exists an infinite, locally finite, connected graph X that is not k-distinguishable but in which every ball of finite radius is k-distinguishable. In the second half of this paper we show that a large distinguishing number for an imprimitive graph X is traceable to a high distinguishing number either of a block of imprimitivity or of the induced action of Aut(X) on the corresponding system of imprimitivity. The distinguishing numbers of infinite primitive graphs have been examined in detail in a previous paper by the authors together with Tom W. Tucker.

The {\em distinguishing number} of a group $G$ acting faithfully on a set $V$ is the least number of colors needed to color the elements of $V$ so that no non-identity element of the group preserves the coloring. The {\em distinguishing number} of a graph is the distinguishing number of its full automorphism group acting on its vertex set. A connected graph $Γ$ is said to have {\em connectivity 1} if there exists a vertex $α\in VΓ$ such that $Γ\setminus \{α\}$ is not connected. For $α\in V$, an orbit of the point stabilizer $G_α$ is called a {\em suborbit} of $G$. We prove that every connected primitive graph with infinite diameter and countably many vertices has distinguishing number 2. Consequently, any infinite, connected, primitive, locally finite graph is 2-distinguishable; so, too, is any infinite primitive group with finite suborbits. We also show that all denumerable vertex-transitive graphs of connectivity 1 and all Cartesian products of connected denumerable graphs of infinite diameter have distinguishing number 2. All of our results follow directly from a versatile lemma which we call The Distinct Spheres Lemma.

If $G$ is a group acting on a set $Ω$ and $α, β\in Ω$, the digraph whose vertex set is $Ω$ and whose arc set is the orbit $(α, β)^G$ is called an {\em orbital digraph} of $G$. Each orbit of the stabiliser $G_α$ acting on $Ω$ is called a {\it suborbit} of $G$. A digraph is {\em locally finite} if each vertex is adjacent to at most finitely many other vertices. A locally finite digraph $Γ$ has more than one end if there exists a finite set of vertices $X$ such that the induced digraph $Γ\setminus X$ contains at least two infinite connected components; if there exists such a set containing precisely one element, then $Γ$ has {\em connectivity one}. In this paper we show that if $G$ is a primitive permutation group whose suborbits are all finite, possessing an orbital digraph with more than one end, then $G$ has a primitive connectivity-one orbital digraph, and this digraph is essentially unique. Such digraphs resemble trees in many respects, and have been fully characterised in a previous paper by the author.

A transitive group $G$ of permutations of a set $Ω$ is primitive if the only $G$-invariant equivalence relations on $Ω$ are the trivial and universal relations. If $α\in Ω$, then the orbits of the stabiliser $G_α$ on $Ω$ are called the $α$-suborbits of $G$; when $G$ acts transitively the cardinalities of these $α$-suborbits are the subdegrees of $G$. If $G$ acts primitively on an infinite set $Ω$, and all the suborbits of $G$ are finite, Adeleke and Neumann asked if, after enumerating the subdegrees of $G$ as a non-decreasing sequence $1 = m_0 \leq m_1 \leq ...$, the subdegree growth rates of infinite primitive groups that act distance-transitively on locally finite distance-transitive graphs are extremal, and conjecture there might exist a number $c$ which perhaps depends upon $G$, perhaps only on $m$, such that $m_r \leq c(m-2)^{r-1}$. In this paper it is shown that such an enumeration is not desirable, as there exist infinite primitive permutation groups possessing no infinite subdegree, in which two distinct subdegrees are each equal to the cardinality of infinitely many suborbits. The examples used to show this provide several novel methods for constructing infinite primitive graphs. A revised enumeration method is then proposed, and it is shown that, under this, Adeleke and Neumann's question may be answered, at least for groups exhibiting suitable rates of growth.