arXiv++ Combinatorics

Given a graph $G$, the Bell $k$-coloring graph $\mathcal{B}_k(G)$ has vertices given by partitions of $V(G)$ into $k$ independent sets (allowing empty parts), with two partitions adjacent if they differ only in the placement of a single vertex. We first give a structural classification of cliques in Bell coloring graphs. We then show that all trees and all cycles arise as Bell coloring graphs, while $K_4-e$ is not a Bell coloring graph and, more generally, $K_n-e$ is not an induced subgraph of any Bell coloring graph whenever $n \geq 6$. We also prove two reconstruction results: the Bell $3$-coloring graph is a complete invariant for trees, and the Bell $n$-coloring multigraph determines any graph up to universal vertices.

Given a tree $T$, its 3-coloring graph $\mathcal{C}_3(T)$ has as vertices the proper 3-colorings of $T$, with edges joining colorings that differ at exactly one vertex. We call the diameter of $\mathcal{C}_3(T)$ the 3-coloring diameter of $T$. We introduce the notion of balanced labelings of $T$ and show that the 3-coloring diameter equals the maximum $L_1$-norm of a balanced labeling. Using this equivalence, we determine the maximum and minimum values of the 3-coloring diameter over all trees on $n$ vertices and characterize the extremal trees.

Given a graph $G$, the $k$-coloring graph $\mathcal{C}_k(G)$ is constructed by selecting proper $k$-colorings of $G$ as vertices, with an edge between two colorings if they differ in the color of exactly one vertex. The number of vertices in $\mathcal{C}_k(G)$ is the famous chromatic polynomial of $G$. Asgarli, Krehbiel, Levinson and Russell showed that for any subgraph $H$, the number of induced copies of $H$ in $\mathcal{C}_k(G)$ is a polynomial function in $k$. Hogan, Scott, Tamitegama, and Tan found a shorter proof for polynomiality of these chromatic $H$-polynomials. In this paper, we provide a method of constructing these polynomials explicitly in terms of chromatic polynomials of shadow graphs. We illustrate the practicality of our formulas by computing an explicit formula for $H$-polynomial for trees when $H=Q_d$ is an arbitrary hypercube, a task which does not seem approachable from previous methods. The coefficients of the resulting polynomials feature generalized degree sequences introduced by Crew. In the special case when $H=P_2$, the corresponding polynomial is dubbed the chromatic pairs polynomial. We present a pair of graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ sharing the same chromatic pairs polynomial but different chromatic polynomials, disproving a conjecture raised by Asgarli, Krehbiel, Levinson and Russell.