arXiv++ Combinatorics

A $k$-proper edge-coloring of a graph G is called adjacent vertex-distinguishing if any two adjacent vertices are distinguished by the set of colors appearing in the edges incident to each vertex. The smallest value $k$ for which $G$ admits such coloring is denoted by $χ'_a(G)$. We prove that $χ'_a(G) = 2R + 1$ for most circulant graphs $C_n([1, R])$.

Recently, several vertex identifying notions were introduced (identifying coloring, lid-coloring, ...), these notions were inspired by identifying codes. All of them, as well as original identifying code, are based on separating two vertices according to some conditions on their closed neighborhood. Therefore, twins can not be identified. So most of known results focus on twin-free graph. Here, we show how twins can modify optimal value of vertex-identifying parameters for identifying coloring and locally identifying coloring. \textbf{Keyword :} Identifying coloring, locally identifying coloring, twins, separating.

The distinguishing number of a graph $H$ is a symmetry related graph invariant whose study started two decades ago. The distinguishing number $D(H)$ is the least integer $d$ such that $H$ has a $d$-distinguishing coloring. A $d$-distinguishing coloring is a coloring $c:V(H)\rightarrow\{1,\dots,d\}$ invariant only under the trivial automorphism. In this paper, we continue the study of a game variant of this parameter, recently introduced. The distinguishing game is a game with two players, Gentle and Rascal, with antagonist goals. This game is played on a graph $H$ with a fixed set of $d\in\mathbb N^*$ colors. Alternately, the two players choose a vertex of $H$ and color it with one of the $d$ colors. The game ends when all the vertices have been colored. Then Gentle wins if the coloring is $d$-distinguishing and Rascal wins otherwise. This game defines two new invariants, which are the minimum numbers of colors needed to ensure that Gentle has a winning strategy, depending who starts the game. The invariant could eventually be infinite. In this paper, we focus on cartesian product, a graph operation well studied in the classical case. We give sufficient conditions on the order of two connected factors $H$ and $F$ relatively prime, which ensure that one of the game distinguishing numbers of the cartesian product $H\square F$ is finite. If $H$ is a so-called involutive graph, we give an upper bound of order $D^2(H)$ for one of the game distinguishing numbers of $H\square F$. Finally, using in part the previous result, we compute the exact value of these invariants for cartesian products of relatively prime cycles. It turns out that the value is either infinite or equal to $2$, depending on the parity of the product order.

The distinguishing number of a graph $G$ is a symmetry related graph invariant whose study started two decades ago. The distinguishing number $D(G)$ is the least integer $d$ such that $G$ has a $d$-distinguishing coloring. A distinguishing $d$-coloring is a coloring $c:V(G)\rightarrow\{1,...,d\}$ invariant only under the trivial automorphism. In this paper, we introduce a game variant of the distinguishing number. The distinguishing game is a game with two players, the Gentle and the Rascal, with antagonist goals. This game is played on a graph $G$ with a set of $d\in\mathbb N^*$ colors. Alternately, the two players choose a vertex of $G$ and color it with one of the $d$ colors. The game ends when all the vertices have been colored. Then the Gentle wins if the coloring is distinguishing and the Rascal wins otherwise. This game leads to define two new invariants for a graph $G$, which are the minimum numbers of colors needed to ensure that the Gentle has a winning strategy, depending on who starts. These invariants could be infinite, thus we start by giving sufficient conditions to have infinite game distinguishing numbers. We also show that for graphs with cyclic automorphisms group of prime odd order, both game invariants are finite. After that, we define a class of graphs, the involutive graphs, for which the game distinguishing number can be quadratically bounded above by the classical distinguishing number. The definition of this class is closely related to imprimitive actions whose blocks have size $2$. Then, we apply results on involutive graphs to compute the exact value of these invariants for hypercubes and even cycles. Finally, we study odd cycles, for which we are able to compute the exact value when their order is not prime. In the prime order case, we give an upper bound of $3$.

Introduced by Albertson et al. \cite{albertson}, the distinguishing number $D(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the least integer $r$ such that there is a $r$-labeling of the vertices of $G$ that is not preserved by any nontrivial automorphism of $G$. Most of graphs studied in literature have 2 as a distinguishing number value except complete, multipartite graphs or cartesian product of complete graphs depending on $n$. In this paper, we study circulant graphs of order $n$ where the adjacency is defined using a symmetric subset $A$ of $\mathbb{Z}_n$, called generator. We give a construction of a family of circulant graphs of order $n$ and we show that this class has distinct distinguishing numbers and these lasters are not depending on $n$.

A \textit{locally identifying coloring} ($lid$-coloring) of a graph is a proper coloring such that the sets of colors appearing in the closed neighborhoods of any pair of adjacent vertices having distinct neighborhoods are distinct. Our goal is to study a \textit{relaxed locally identifying coloring} ($rlid$-coloring) of a graph that is similar to locally identifying coloring for which the coloring is not necessary proper.We denote by $χ_{rlid}(G)$ the minimum number of colors used in a relaxed locally identifying coloring of a graph $G$ In this paper, we prove that the problem of deciding that $χ_{rlid}(G)=3$ for a $2$-degenerate planar graph $G$ is $NP$-complete. We give several bounds of $χ_{rlid}(G)$ and construct graphs for which some of these bounds are tightened. Studying some families of graphs allows us to compare this parameter with the minimum number of colors used in a locally identifying coloring of a graph $G$ ($χ_{lid}(G)$), the size of a minimum identifying code of $G$ ($γ_{id}(G)$) and the chromatic number of $G$ ($χ(G)$).