arXiv++ Combinatorics

In this paper we introduce and investigate a new type of automata which turns out to be rich in deep and complex phenomena. For our model, a maze is a countable strongly connected digraph called the board together with a proper colouring of its edges (the edges leaving a vertex have distinct colours) and two special vertices: the origin and the destination. A pointer or robot starts at the origin of a maze and moves naturally between its vertices, according to a finite or infinite sequence of specific instructions from the set of all colours called an algorithm; if the robot is at a vertex for which there is no out-edge of the colour indicated by the instruction, it remains at that vertex and proceeds to execute the next instruction in the sequence. The central object of study is the existence of algorithms that simultaneously solve, that is guide the robot to visit the destination in, certain large sets of mazes. One of the most natural and interesting sets of mazes arises from the square lattice $\Z^2$ viewed as a graph with arbitrarily many edges removed (each edge corresponds to a pair of opposite directed edges), together with the suggestive colouring that assigns to each directed edge the corresponding cardinal direction. In this set-up, a research question of Leader and Spink from 2011, which proved to be very profound, asks whether there exists an algorithm which solves this set of mazes. In this paper we make progress towards this question. We consider the subset of all such mazes which have arbitrarily many horizontal edges removed but only finitely many vertical edges removed in consecutive columns, and construct an algorithm which solves this subset of mazes.

For two graphs $B$ and $H$ the strong Ramsey game $\mathcal{R}(B,H)$ on the board $B$ and with target $H$ is played as follows. Two players alternately claim edges of $B$. The first player to build a copy of $H$ wins. If none of the players win, the game is declared a draw. A notorious open question of Beck asks whether the first player has a winning strategy in $\mathcal{R}(K_n,K_k)$ in bounded time as $n\rightarrow\infty$. Surprisingly, in a recent paper Hefetz et al. constructed a $5$-uniform hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$ for which they proved that the first player does not have a winning strategy in $\mathcal{R}(K_n^{(5)},\mathcal{H})$ in bounded time. They naturally ask whether the same result holds for graphs. In this paper we make further progress in decreasing the rank. In our first result, we construct a graph $G$ (in fact $G=K_6\setminus K_4$) and prove that the first player does not have a winning strategy in $\mathcal{R}(K_n \sqcup K_n,G)$ in bounded time. As an application of this result we deduce our second result in which we construct a $4$-uniform hypergraph $G'$ and prove that the first player does not have a winning strategy in $\mathcal{R}(K_n^{(4)},G')$ in bounded time. This improves the result in the paper above. An equivalent formulation of our first result is that the game $\mathcal{R}(K_ω\sqcup K_ω,G)$ is a draw. Another reason for interest on the board $K_ω\sqcup K_ω$ is a folklore result that the disjoint union of two finite positional games both of which are first player wins is also a first player win. An amusing corollary of our first result is that at least one of the following two natural statements is false: (1) for every graph $H$, $\mathcal{R}(K_ω,H)$ is a first player win; (2) for every graph $H$ if $\mathcal{R}(K_ω,H)$ is a first player win, then $\mathcal{R}(K_ω\sqcup K_ω,H)$ is also a first player win.

We ask if there exists a symmetric chain decomposition of the cuboid $Q_k \times n$ such that no chain is "taut", i.e. no chain has a subchain of the form $(a_1,\ldots, a_k,0)\prec \ldots\prec (a_1,\ldots,a_k,n-1)$. In this paper, we show this is true precisely when $k \ge 5$ and $n\ge 3$. This question arises naturally when considering products of symmetric chain decompositions which induce orthogonal chain decompositions --- the existence of the decompositions provided in this paper unexpectedly resolves the most difficult case of previous work by the second author on almost orthogonal symmetric chain decompositions \cite{orth}, making progress on a conjecture of Shearer and Kleitman. In general, we show that for a finite graded poset $P$, there exists a canonical bijection between symmetric chain decompositions of $P \times m$ and $P \times n$ for $m, n\ge \text{rk}(P) + 1$, that preserves the existence of taut chains. If $P$ has a unique maximal and minimal element, then we also produce a canonical $(\text{rk}(P) +1)$ to $1$ surjection from symmetric chain decompositions of $P \times (\text{rk}(P) + 1)$ to symmetric chain decompositions of $P \times \text{rk}(P)$ which sends decompositions with taut chains to decompositions with taut chains.

We create a framework for studying symmetric chain decompositions of families of finite posets based on the geometry of polytopes. Our framework unifies almost all known results regarding symmetric chain decompositions of the Young posets $L(m,n)$ --- arising as cells in the Bruhat decomposition of quotients of $SL_{m+n+1}$ --- and yields unexpected new results. The methods we provide are geometric in nature, systematic, and totally amenable to human analysis. This allows us to discover new phenomena which are impenetrable to casework and brute force computer search. In particular, our method yields perfect and near perfect decompositions of various families of posets, which are intractable by known methods. A fundamental tool we use is geometrical projection, which in our framework cleanly unifies many different types of induction; as we move a point from which we project between faces of our polytope, we alter the type of induction. Moreover, projection allows us to decrease dimension and therefore obtain a clear geometric intuition. We also provide additional tools for producing decompositions, and discuss how the various decompositions behave under products.