arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let $α$ and $β$ belong to the same quadratic field. We show that the inhomogeneous Beatty sequence $(\lfloor n α+ β\rfloor)_{n \geq 1}$ is synchronized, in the sense that there is a finite automaton that takes as input the Ostrowski representations of $n$ and $y$ in parallel, and accepts if and only if $y = \lfloor n α+ β\rfloor$. Since it is already known that the addition relation is computable for Ostrowski representations based on a quadratic number, a consequence is a new and rather simple proof that the first-order logical theory of these sequences with addition is decidable. The decision procedure is easily implemented in the free software Walnut. As an application, we show that for each $r \geq 1$ it is decidable whether the set $\{ \lfloor n α+ β\rfloor \, : \, n \geq 1 \}$ forms an additive basis (or asymptotic additive basis) of order $r$. Using our techniques, we also solve some open problems of Reble and Kimberling, and give an explicit characterization of a sequence of Hildebrand et al.

We revisit the topic of power-free morphisms, focusing on the properties of the class of complementary morphisms. Such morphisms are defined over a $2$-letter alphabet, and map the letters 0 and 1 to complementary words. We prove that every prefix of the famous Thue-Morse word $\mathbf{t}$ gives a complementary morphism that is $3^+$-free and hence $α$-free for every real number $α>3$. We also describe, using a 4-state binary finite automaton, the lengths of all prefixes of $\mathbf{t}$ that give cubefree complementary morphisms. Next, we show that $3$-free (cubefree) complementary morphisms of length $k$ exist for all $k\not\in \{3,6\}$. Moreover, if $k$ is not of the form $3\cdot2^n$, then the images of letters can be chosen to be factors of $\mathbf{t}$. Finally, we observe that each cubefree complementary morphism is also $α$-free for some $α<3$; in contrast, no binary morphism that maps each letter to a word of length 3 (resp., a word of length 6) is $α$-free for any $α<3$. In addition to more traditional techniques of combinatorics on words, we also rely on the Walnut theorem-prover. Its use and limitations are discussed.