arXiv++ Combinatorics

In an incomplete round robin tournament, teams play against different sets of opponents. Given varying strengths of the teams, this raises a fairness issue. We establish the complexity of determining whether a fair draw exists under various scenarios involving the presence of pots (i.e., strength based groups of teams), teams coming from the same association, connectivity requirements, and others. We also show experimentally how fair incomplete round robin tournaments can be generated.

We introduce a new measure to capture fairness of a schedule in a single round robin (SRR) tournament when participants are ranked by strength. To prevent distortion of the outcome of an SRR tournament as well as to guarantee equal treatment, we argue that each participant should face its opponents when ranked by strength in an alternating fashion with respect to the home/away advantage. Here, the home/away advantage captures a variety of situations. We provide an explicit construction proving that so-called ranking-fair schedules exist when the number of participants is a multiple of 4. Further, we give a formulation that outputs ranking-fair schedules when they exist. Finally, we show that the most popular method to come to a schedule for an SRR tournament, does not allow ranking-fair schedules when the number of teams exceeds 8. These findings impact the type of schedules to be used for SRR tournaments.