arXiv++ Combinatorics

Co-occurence networks can be adequately modeled by hyper-bag-graphs (hb-graphs for short). A hb-graph is a family of multisets having same universe, called the vertex set. An efficient exchange-based diffusion scheme has been previously proposed that allows the ranking of both vertices and hb-edges. In this article, we extend this scheme to allow biases of different kinds and explore their effect on the different rankings obtained. The biases enhance the emphasize on some particular aspects of the network.

In graphs, the concept of adjacency is clearly defined: it is a pairwise relationship between vertices. Adjacency in hypergraphs has to integrate hyperedge multi-adicity: the concept of adjacency needs to be defined properly by introducing two new concepts: $k$-adjacency - $k$ vertices are in the same hyperedge - and e-adjacency - vertices of a given hyperedge are e-adjacent. In order to build a new e-adjacency tensor that is interpretable in terms of hypergraph uniformisation, we designed two processes: the first is a hypergraph uniformisation process (HUP) and the second is a polynomial homogeneisation process (PHP). The PHP allows the construction of the e-adjacency tensor while the HUP ensures that the PHP keeps interpretability. This tensor is symmetric and can be fully described by the number of hyperedges; its order is the range of the hypergraph, while extra dimensions allow to capture additional hypergraph structural information including the maximum level of $k$-adjacency of each hyperedge. Some results on spectral analysis are discussed.

Finding inherent or processed links within a dataset allows to discover potential knowledge. The main contribution of this article is to define a global framework that enables optimal knowledge discovery by visually rendering co-occurences (i.e. groups of linked data instances attached to a metadata reference) - either inherently present or processed - from a dataset as facets. Hypergraphs are well suited for modeling co-occurences since they support multi-adicity whereas graphs only support pairwise relationships. This article introduces an efficient navigation between different facets of an information space based on hypergraph modelisation and visualisation.

HyperBagGraphs (hb-graphs as short) extend hypergraphs by allowing the hyperedges to be multisets. Multisets are composed of elements that have a multiplicity. When this multiplicity has positive integer values, it corresponds to non ordered lists of potentially duplicated elements. We define hb-graphs as family of multisets over a vertex set; natural hb-graphs correspond to hb-graphs that have multiplicity function with positive integer values. Extending the definition of e-adjacency to natural hb-graphs, we define different way of building an e-adjacency tensor, that we compare before having a final choice of the tensor. This hb-graph e-adjacency tensor is used with hypergraphs.

Adjacency between two vertices in graphs or hypergraphs is a pairwise relationship. It is redefined in this article as 2-adjacency. In general hypergraphs, hyperedges hold for $n$-adic relationship. To keep the $n$-adic relationship the concepts of $k$-adjacency and e-adjacency are defined. In graphs 2-adjacency and e-adjacency concepts match, just as $k$-adjacency and e-adjacency do for $k$-uniform hypergraphs. For general hypergraphs these concepts are different. This paper also contributes in a uniformization process of a general hypergraph to allow the definition of an e-adjacency tensor, viewed as a hypermatrix, reflecting the general hypergraph structure. This symmetric e-adjacency hypermatrix allows to capture not only the degree of the vertices and the cardinality of the hyperedges but also makes a full separation of the different layers of a hypergraph.