arXiv++ Combinatorics

Enumeration problems are often encountered as key subroutines in the exact computation of graph parameters such as chromatic number, treewidth, or treedepth. In the case of treedepth computation, the enumeration of inclusion-wise minimal separators plays a crucial role. However and quite surprisingly, the complexity status of this problem has not been settled since it has been posed as an open direction by Kloks and Kratsch in 1998. Recently at the PACE 2020 competition dedicated to treedepth computation, solvers have been circumventing that by listing all minimal $a$-$b$ separators and filtering out those that are not inclusion-wise minimal, at the cost of efficiency. Naturally, having an efficient algorithm for listing inclusion-wise minimal separators would drastically improve such practical algorithms. In this note, however, we show that no efficient algorithm is to be expected from an output-sensitive perspective, namely, we prove that there is no output-polynomial time algorithm for inclusion-wise minimal separators enumeration unless P = NP.

In this paper, we study the dualization in distributive lattices, a generalization of the well-known hypergraph dualization problem. We in particular propose equivalent formulations of the problem in terms of graphs, hypergraphs, and posets. It is known that hypergraph dualization amounts to generate all minimal transversals of a hypergraph, or all minimal dominating sets of a graph. In this new framework, a poset on vertices is given together with the input (hyper)graph, and minimal ``ideal solutions'' are to be generated. This in particular allows us to study the complexity of the problem under various combined restrictions on graph classes and poset types, including bipartite, split, and co-bipartite graphs, and variants of neighborhood inclusion posets. We for example show that while the enumeration of minimal dominating sets is possible with linear delay in split graphs, the problem, within the same class, gets as hard as for general graphs when generalized to this framework. More surprisingly, this result holds even when the poset is only comparing vertices of included neighborhoods in the graph. If both the poset and the graph class are sufficiently restricted, we show that the dualization is tractable relying on existing algorithms from the literature.