arXiv++ Combinatorics

This article shines new light on the classical problem of tiling rectangles with squares efficiently with a novel method. With a twist on the traditional approach of resistor networks, we provide new and improved results on the matter using the theory of Diophantine Approximation, hence overcoming long-established difficulties, such as generalizations to higher-dimensional analogues. The universality of the method is demonstrated through its applications to different tiling problems. These include tiling rectangles with other rectangles, with their respective higher-dimensional counterparts, as well as tiling equilateral triangles, parallelograms, and trapezoids with equilateral triangles.

We prove new bounds on the dimensions of distance sets and pinned distance sets of planar sets. Among other results, we show that if $A\subset\mathbb{R}^2$ is a Borel set of Hausdorff dimension $s>1$, then its distance set has Hausdorff dimension at least $37/54\approx 0.685$. Moreover, if $s\in (1,3/2]$, then outside of a set of exceptional $y$ of Hausdorff dimension at most $1$, the pinned distance set $\{ |x-y|:x\in A\}$ has Hausdorff dimension $\ge \tfrac{2}{3}s$ and packing dimension at least $ \tfrac{1}{4}(1+s+\sqrt{3s(2-s)}) \ge 0.933$. These estimates improve upon the existing ones by Bourgain, Wolff, Peres-Schlag and Iosevich-Liu for sets of Hausdorff dimension $>1$. Our proof uses a multi-scale decomposition of measures in which, unlike previous works, we are able to choose the scales subject to certain constrains. This leads to a combinatorial problem, which is a key new ingredient of our approach, and which we solve completely by optimizing certain variation of Lipschitz functions.

We study the relationship between the sizes of two sets $B, S\subset\mathbb{R}^2$ when $B$ contains either the whole boundary, or the four vertices, of a square with axes-parallel sides and center in every point of $S$, where size refers to one of cardinality, Hausdorff dimension, packing dimension, or upper or lower box dimension. Perhaps surprinsingly, the results vary depending on the notion of size under consideration. For example, we construct a compact set $B$ of Hausdorff dimension $1$ which contains the boundary of an axes-parallel square with center in every point $[0,1]^2$, but prove that such a $B$ must have packing and lower box dimension at least $\tfrac{7}{4}$, and show by example that this is sharp. For more general sets of centers, the answers for packing and box counting dimensions also differ. These problems are inspired by the analogous problems for circles that were investigated by Bourgain, Marstrand and Wolff, among others.

Let $G$ be a finite abelian group and $E$ a subset of it. Suppose that we know for all subsets $T$ of $G$ of size up to $k$ for how many $x \in G$ the translate $x+T$ is contained in $E$. This information is collectively called the $k$-deck of $E$. One can naturally extend the domain of definition of the $k$-deck to include functions on $G$. Given the group $G$ when is the $k$-deck of a set in $G$ sufficient to determine the set up to translation? The 2-deck is not sufficient (even when we allow for reflection of the set, which does not change the 2-deck) and the first interesting case is $k=3$. We further restrict $G$ to be cyclic and determine the values of $n$ for which the 3-deck of a subset of $\ZZ_n$ is sufficient to determine the set up to translation. This completes the work begun by Grünbaum and Moore as far as the 3-deck is concerned. We additionally estimate from above the probability that for a random subset of $\ZZ_n$ there exists another subset, not a translate of the first, with the same 3-deck. We give an exponentially small upper bound when the previously known one was $O(1\bigl / \sqrt{n})$.