arXiv++ Combinatorics

Random walks on expanders play a crucial role in Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithms, derandomization, graph theory, and distributed computing. A desirable property is that they are rapidly mixing, which is equivalent to having a spectral gap $γ$ (asymptotically) bounded away from $0$. Our work has two main strands. First, we establish a dichotomy for the robustness of mixing times on edge-weighted $d$-regular graphs (i.e., reversible Markov chains) subject to a Lipschitz condition, which bounds the ratio of adjacent weights by $β\geq 1$. If $β\ge 1$ is sufficiently small, then $γ\asymp 1$ and the mixing time is logarithmic in $n$. On the other hand, if $β\geq 2d$, there is an edge-weighting such that $γ$ is polynomially small in $1/n$. Second, we apply our robustness result to a time-dependent version of the so-called $\varepsilon$-biased random walk, as introduced in Azar et al. [Combinatorica 1996]. We show that, for any constant $\varepsilon>0$, a bias strategy can be chosen adaptively so that the $\varepsilon$-biased random walk covers any bounded-degree regular expander in $Θ(n)$ expected time, improving the previous-best bound of $O(n \log \log n)$. We prove the first non-trivial lower bound on the cover time of the $\varepsilon$-biased random walk, showing that, on bounded-degree regular expanders, it is $ω(n)$ whenever $\varepsilon = o(1)$. We establish this by controlling how much the probability of arbitrary events can be ``boosted'' by using a time-dependent bias strategy.

Randomized rumor spreading processes diffuse information on an undirected graph and have been widely studied. In this work, we present a generic framework for analyzing a broad class of such processes on regular graphs. Our analysis is protocol-agnostic, as it only requires the expected proportion of newly informed vertices in each round to be bounded, and a natural negative correlation property. This framework allows us to analyze various protocols, including PUSH, PULL, and PUSH-PULL, thereby extending prior research. Unlike previous work, our framework accommodates message failures at any time $t\geq 0$ with a probability of $1-q(t)$, where the credibility $q(t)$ is any function of time. This enables us to model real-world scenarios in which the transmissibility of rumors may fluctuate, as seen in the spread of ``fake news'' and viruses. Additionally, our framework is sufficiently broad to cover dynamic graphs.

We introduce a new class of balanced allocation processes which bias towards underloaded bins (those with load below the mean load) either by skewing the probability by which a bin is chosen for an allocation (probability bias), or alternatively, by adding more balls to an underloaded bin (weight bias). A prototypical process satisfying the probability bias condition is Mean-Thinning: At each round, we sample one bin and if it is underloaded, we allocate one ball; otherwise, we allocate one ball to a second bin sample. Versions of this process have been in use since at least 1986. An example of a process, introduced by us, which satisfies the weight bias condition is Twinning: At each round, we only sample one bin. If the bin is underloaded, then we allocate two balls; otherwise, we allocate only one ball. Our main result is that for any process with a probability or weight bias, with high probability the gap between maximum and minimum load is logarithmic in the number of bins. This result holds for any number of allocated balls (heavily loaded case), covers many natural processes that relax the Two-Choice process, and we also prove it is tight for many such processes, including Mean-Thinning and Twinning. Our analysis employs a delicate interplay between linear, quadratic and exponential potential functions. It also hinges on a phenomenon we call "mean quantile stabilization", which holds in greater generality than our framework and may be of independent interest.

In balanced allocations, the goal is to place $m$ balls into $n$ bins, so as to minimize the gap (difference of max to average load). The One-Choice process places each ball to a bin sampled independently and uniformly at random. The Two-Choice process places balls in the least loaded of two sampled bins. Finally, the $(1+β)$-process mixes these processes, meaning each ball is allocated using Two-Choice with probability $β\in(0,1)$, and using One-Choice otherwise. Despite Two-Choice being optimal in the sequential setting, it has been observed in practice that it does not perform well in a parallel environment, where load information may be outdated. Following [BCEFN12], we study such a parallel setting where balls are allocated in batches of size $b$, and balls within the same batch are allocated with the same strategy and based on the same load information. For small batch sizes $b\in[n,n\log n]$, it was shown in [LS22a] that Two-Choice achieves an asymptotically optimal gap among all processes with a constant number of samples. In this work, we focus on larger batch sizes $b\in[n\log n,n^3]$. It was proved in [LS22c] that Two-Choice leads to a gap of $Θ(b/n)$. As our main result, we prove that the gap reduces to $O(\sqrt{(b/n)\cdot\log n})$, if one runs the $(1+β)$-process with an appropriately chosen $β$ (in fact this result holds for a larger class of processes). This not only proves the phenomenon that Two-Choice is not the best (leading to the formation of "towers" over previously light bins), but also that mixing two processes (One-Choice and Two-Choice) leads to a process which achieves a gap that is asymptotically smaller than both. We also derive a matching lower bound of $Ω(\sqrt{(b/n)\cdot\log n})$ for any allocation process, which demonstrates that the above $(1+β)$-process is asymptotically optimal.

We consider the allocation of $m$ balls (jobs) into $n$ bins (servers). In the standard Two-Choice process, at each step $t=1,2,\ldots,m$ we first sample two bins uniformly at random and place a ball in the least loaded bin. It is well-known that for any $m \geq n$, this results in a gap (difference between the maximum and average load) of $\log_2 \log n + Θ(1)$ (with high probability). In this work, we consider the Memory process [Mitzenmacher, Prabhakar and Shah 2002] where instead of two choices, we only sample one bin per step but we have access to a cache which can store the location of one bin. Mitzenmacher, Prabhakar and Shah showed that in the lightly loaded case ($m = n$), the Memory process achieves a gap of $\mathcal{O}(\log \log n)$. Extending the setting of Mitzenmacher et al. in two ways, we first allow the number of balls $m$ to be arbitrary, which includes the challenging heavily loaded case where $m \geq n$. Secondly, we follow the heterogeneous bins model of Wieder [Wieder 2007], where the sampling distribution of bins can be biased up to some arbitrary multiplicative constant. Somewhat surprisingly, we prove that even in this setting, the Memory process still achieves an $\mathcal{O}(\log \log n)$ gap bound. This is in stark contrast with the Two-Choice (or any $d$-Choice with $d=\mathcal{O}(1)$) process, where it is known that the gap diverges as $m \rightarrow \infty$ [Wieder 2007]. Further, we show that for any sampling distribution independent of $m$ (but possibly dependent on $n$) the Memory process has a gap that can be bounded independently of $m$. Finally, we prove a tight gap bound of $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$ for Memory in another relaxed setting with heterogeneous (weighted) balls and a cache which can only be maintained for two steps.

We consider the allocation of $m$ balls (jobs) into $n$ bins (servers). In the standard Two-Choice process, at each step $t=1,2,\ldots,m$ we first sample two randomly chosen bins, compare their two loads and then place a ball in the least loaded bin. It is well-known that for any $m\geq n$, this results in a gap (difference between the maximum and average load) of $\log_2\log n+Θ(1)$ (with high probability). In this work, we consider Two-Choice in different settings with noisy load comparisons. One key setting involves an adaptive adversary whose power is limited by some threshold $g\in\mathbb{N}$. In each step, such adversary can determine the result of any load comparison between two bins whose loads differ by at most $g$, while if the load difference is greater than $g$, the comparison is correct. For this adversarial setting, we first prove that for any $m \geq n$ the gap is $O(g+\log n)$ with high probability. Then through a refined analysis we prove that if $g\leq\log n$, then for any $m \geq n$ the gap is $O(\frac{g}{\log g}\cdot\log\log n)$. For constant values of $g$, this generalizes the heavily loaded analysis of [BCSV06, TW14] for the Two-Choice process, and establishes that asymptotically the same gap bound holds even if load comparisons among "similarly loaded" bins are wrong. Finally, we complement these upper bounds with tight lower bounds, which establish an interesting phase transition on how the parameter $g$ impacts the gap. The analysis also applies to settings with outdated and delayed information. For example, for the setting of [BCEFN12] where balls are allocated in consecutive batches of size $b=n$, we present an improved and tight gap bound of $Θ(\frac{\log n}{\log\log n})$. This bound also extends for a range of values of $b$ and applies to a relaxed setting where the reported load of a bin can be any load value from the last $b$ steps.

We introduce a new class of balanced allocation processes which are primarily characterized by ``filling'' underloaded bins. A prototypical example is the Packing process: At each round we only take one bin sample, if the load is below the average load, then we place as many balls until the average load is reached; otherwise, we place only one ball. We prove that for any process in this class the gap between the maximum and average load is $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$ w.h.p. for any number of balls $m\geq 1$. For the Packing process, we also provide a matching lower bound. Additionally, we prove that the Packing process is sample-efficient in the sense that the expected number of balls allocated per sample is strictly greater than one. Finally, we also demonstrate that the upper bound of $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$ on the gap can be extended to the Memory process studied by Mitzenmacher, Prabhakar and Shah (2002).

We consider the allocation of $m$ balls (jobs) into $n$ bins (servers). In the Two-Choice process, for each of $m$ sequentially arriving balls, two randomly chosen bins are sampled and the ball is placed in the least loaded bin. It is well-known that the maximum load is $m/n+\log_2 \log n + O(1)$ w.h.p. Berenbrink, Czumaj, Englert, Friedetzky and Nagel (2012) introduced a parallel version of this process, where $m$ balls arrive in consecutive batches of size $b=n$ each. Balls within the same batch are allocated in parallel, using the load information of the bins at the beginning of the batch. They proved that the gap of this process is $O(\log n)$ with high probability. In this work, we present a new analysis of this setting, which is based on exponential potential functions. This allows us to both simplify and generalize the analysis of [BCE12] in different ways: $\quad 1.$ Our analysis covers a broad class of processes. This includes not only Two-Choice, but also processes with fewer bin samples like $(1+β)$, processes which can only receive one bit of information from each bin sample and graphical allocation, where bins correspond to vertices in a graph. $\quad 2.$ Balls may be of different weights, as long as their weights are independent samples from a distribution satisfying a technical condition on its moment generating function. $\quad 3.$ For arbitrary batch sizes $b \geq n$, we prove a gap of $O(b/n \cdot \log n)$. For any $b \in [n , n^3]$, we improve this to $O(b/n + \log n)$ and show that it is tight for a family of processes. This implies the unexpected result that for e.g. $(1+β)$ with constant $β\in (0, 1]$, the gap is $Θ(\log n)$ for all $b \in [n,n \log n]$. We also conduct experiments which support our theoretical results, and even hint at a superiority of less powerful processes like $(1+β)$ for large batch sizes.

We study the repeated balls-into-bins process introduced by Becchetti, Clementi, Natale, Pasquale and Posta (2019). This process starts with $m$ balls arbitrarily distributed across $n$ bins. At each round $t=1,2,\ldots$, one ball is selected from each non-empty bin, and then placed it into a bin chosen independently and uniformly at random. We prove the following results: $\quad \bullet$ For any $n \leq m \leq \mathrm{poly}(n)$, we prove a lower bound of $Ω(m/n \cdot \log n)$ on the maximum load. For the special case $m=n$, this matches the upper bound of $O(\log n)$, as shown in [BCNPP19]. It also provides a positive answer to the conjecture in [BCNPP19] that for $m=n$ the maximum load is $ω(\log n/ \log \log n)$ at least once in a polynomially large time interval. For $m\in [ω(n),n\log n]$, our new lower bound disproves the conjecture in [BCNPP19] that the maximum load remains $O(\log n)$. $\quad \bullet$ For any $n\leq m\leq\mathrm{poly}(n)$, we prove an upper bound of $O(m/n\cdot\log n)$ on the maximum load for all steps of a polynomially large time interval. This matches our lower bound up to multiplicative constants. $\quad \bullet$ For any $m\geq n$, our analysis also implies an $O(m^2/n)$ waiting time to reach a configuration with a $O(m/n\cdot\log m)$ maximum load, even for worst-case initial distributions. $\quad \bullet$ For any $m \geq n$, we show that every ball visits every bin in $O(m\log m)$ rounds. For $m = n$, this improves the previous upper bound of $O(n \log^2 n)$ in [BCNPP19]. We also prove that the upper bound is tight up to multiplicative constants for any $n \leq m \leq \mathrm{poly}(n)$.

We consider the sequential allocation of $m$ balls (jobs) into $n$ bins (servers) by allowing each ball to choose from some bins sampled uniformly at random. The goal is to maintain a small gap between the maximum load and the average load. In this paper, we present a general framework that allows us to analyze various allocation processes that slightly prefer allocating into underloaded, as opposed to overloaded bins. Our analysis covers several natural instances of processes, including: The Caching process (a.k.a. memory protocol) as studied by Mitzenmacher, Prabhakar and Shah (2002): At each round we only take one bin sample, but we also have access to a cache in which the most recently used bin is stored. We place the ball into the least loaded of the two. The Packing process: At each round we only take one bin sample. If the load is below some threshold (e.g., the average load), then we place as many balls until the threshold is reached; otherwise, we place only one ball. The Twinning process: At each round, we only take one bin sample. If the load is below some threshold, then we place two balls; otherwise, we place only one ball. The Thinning process as recently studied by Feldheim and Gurel-Gurevich (2021): At each round, we first take one bin sample. If its load is below some threshold, we place one ball; otherwise, we place one ball into a $\textit{second}$ bin sample. As we demonstrate, our general framework implies for all these processes a gap of $\mathcal{O}(\log n)$ between the maximum load and average load, even when an arbitrary number of balls $m \geq n$ are allocated (heavily loaded case). Our analysis is inspired by a previous work of Peres, Talwar and Wieder (2010) for the $(1+β)$-process, however here we rely on the interplay between different potential functions to prove stabilization.

We consider the allocation of $m$ balls into $n$ bins with incomplete information. In the classical Two-Choice process a ball first queries the load of two randomly chosen bins and is then placed in the least loaded bin. In our setting, each ball also samples two random bins but can only estimate a bin's load by sending binary queries of the form "Is the load at least the median?" or "Is the load at least 100?". For the lightly loaded case $m=O(n)$, Feldheim and Gurel-Gurevich (2021) showed that with one query it is possible to achieve a maximum load of $O(\sqrt{\log n/\log \log n})$, and posed the question whether a maximum load of $m/n+O(\sqrt{\log n/\log \log n})$ is possible for any $m = Ω(n)$. In this work, we resolve this open problem by proving a lower bound of $m/n+Ω( \sqrt{\log n})$ for a fixed $m=Θ(n \sqrt{\log n})$, and a lower bound of $m/n+Ω(\log n/\log \log n)$ for some $m$ depending on the used strategy. We complement this negative result by proving a positive result for multiple queries. In particular, we show that with only two binary queries per chosen bin, there is an oblivious strategy which ensures a maximum load of $m/n+O(\sqrt{\log n})$ for any $m \geq 1$. Further, for any number of $k = O(\log \log n)$ binary queries, the upper bound on the maximum load improves to $m/n + O(k(\log n)^{1/k})$ for any $m \geq 1$. Further, this result for $k$ queries implies (i) new bounds for the $(1+β)$-process introduced by Peres et al (2015), (ii) new bounds for the graphical balanced allocation process on dense expander graphs, and (iii) the bound of $m/n+O(\log \log n)$ on the maximum load achieved by the Two-Choice process, including the heavily loaded case $m=Ω(n)$ derived by Berenbrink et al. (2006). One novel aspect of our proofs is the use of multiple super-exponential potential functions, which might be of use in future work.

Random walks on graphs are an essential primitive for many randomised algorithms and stochastic processes. It is natural to ask how much can be gained by running $k$ multiple random walks independently and in parallel. Although the cover time of multiple walks has been investigated for many natural networks, the problem of finding a general characterisation of multiple cover times for worst-case start vertices (posed by Alon, Avin, Koucký, Kozma, Lotker, and Tuttle~in 2008) remains an open problem. First, we improve and tighten various bounds on the stationary cover time when $k$ random walks start from vertices sampled from the stationary distribution. For example, we prove an unconditional lower bound of $Ω((n/k) \log n)$ on the stationary cover time, holding for any $n$-vertex graph $G$ and any $1 \leq k =o(n\log n )$. Secondly, we establish the stationary cover times of multiple walks on several fundamental networks up to constant factors. Thirdly, we present a framework characterising worst-case cover times in terms of stationary cover times and a novel, relaxed notion of mixing time for multiple walks called the partial mixing time. Roughly speaking, the partial mixing time only requires a specific portion of all random walks to be mixed. Using these new concepts, we can establish (or recover) the worst-case cover times for many networks including expanders, preferential attachment graphs, grids, binary trees and hypercubes.

We study the biased random walk where at each step of a random walk a "controller" can, with a certain small probability, move the walk to an arbitrary neighbour. This model was introduced by Azar et al. [STOC'1992]; we extend their work to the time dependent setting and consider cover times of this walk. We obtain new bounds on the cover and hitting times. Azar et al. conjectured that the controller can increase the stationary probability of a vertex from $p$ to $p^{1-ε}$; while this conjecture is not true in full generality, we propose a best-possible amended version of this conjecture and confirm it for a broad class of graphs. We also consider the problem of computing an optimal strategy for the controller to minimise the cover time and show that for directed graphs determining the cover time is PSPACE-complete.

We apply the power-of-two-choices paradigm to a random walk on a graph: rather than moving to a uniform random neighbour at each step, a controller is allowed to choose from two independent uniform random neighbours. We prove that this allows the controller to significantly accelerate the hitting and cover times in several natural graph classes. In particular, we show that the cover time becomes linear in the number $n$ of vertices on discrete tori and bounded degree trees, of order $\mathcal{O}(n \log \log n)$ on bounded degree expanders, and of order $\mathcal{O}(n (\log \log n)^2)$ on the Erdős-Rényi random graph in a certain sparsely connected regime. We also consider the algorithmic question of computing an optimal strategy, and prove a dichotomy in efficiency between computing strategies for hitting and cover times.

We study two random processes on an $n$-vertex graph inspired by the internal diffusion limited aggregation (IDLA) model. In both processes $n$ particles start from an arbitrary but fixed origin. Each particle performs a simple random walk until first encountering an unoccupied vertex, and at which point the vertex becomes occupied and the random walk terminates. In one of the processes, called \textit{Sequential-IDLA}, only one particle moves until settling and only then does the next particle start whereas in the second process, called \textit{Parallel-IDLA}, all unsettled particles move simultaneously. Our main goal is to analyze the so-called dispersion time of these processes, which is the maximum number of steps performed by any of the $n$ particles. In order to compare the two processes, we develop a coupling which shows the dispersion time of the Parallel-IDLA stochastically dominates that of the Sequential-IDLA; however, the total number of steps performed by all particles has the same distribution in both processes. This coupling also gives us that dispersion time of Parallel-IDLA is bounded in expectation by dispersion time of the Sequential-IDLA up to a multiplicative $\log n$ factor. Moreover, we derive asymptotic upper and lower bound on the dispersion time for several graph classes, such as cliques, cycles, binary trees, $d$-dimensional grids, hypercubes and expanders. Most of our bounds are tight up to a multiplicative constant.

Coalescing random walks is a fundamental stochastic process, where a set of particles perform independent discrete-time random walks on an undirected graph. Whenever two or more particles meet at a given node, they merge and continue as a single random walk. The coalescence time is defined as the expected time until only one particle remains, starting from one particle at every node. Despite recent progress the coalescence time for graphs such as binary trees, d-dimensional tori, hypercubes and more generally, vertex-transitive graphs, remains unresolved. We provide a powerful toolkit that results in tight bounds for various topologies including the aforementioned ones. The meeting time is defined as the worst-case expected time required for two random walks to arrive at the same node at the same time. As a general result, we establish that for graphs whose meeting time is only marginally larger than the mixing time (a factor of log^2 n), the coalescence time of n random walks equals the meeting time up to constant factors. This upper bound is complemented by the construction of a graph family demonstrating that this result is the best possible up to constant factors. For almost-regular graphs, we bound the coalescence time by the hitting time, resolving the discrete-time variant of a conjecture by Aldous for this class of graphs. Finally, we prove that for any graph the coalescence time is bounded by O(n^3) (which is tight for the Barbell graph); surprisingly even such a basic question about the coalescing time was not answered before this work. By duality, our results give bounds on the voter model and therefore give bounds on the consensus time in arbitrary undirected graphs. We also establish a new bound on the hitting time and cover time of regular graphs, improving and tightening previous results by Broder and Karlin, as well as those by Aldous and Fill.

A subset of the finite dimensional hypercube is said to be equilateral if the distance of any two distinct points equals a fixed value. The equilateral dimension of the hypercube is defined as the maximal size of its equilateral subsets. We study asymptotic bounds on the latter quantity considered as a function of two variables, namely dimension and distance.

The cutoff phenomenon for an ergodic Markov chain describes a sharp transition in the convergence to its stationary distribution, over a negligible period of time, known as cutoff window. We study the cutoff phenomenon for simple random walks on Kneser graphs, which is a family of ergodic Markov chains. Given two integers $n$ and $k$, the Kneser graph $K(2n+k,n)$ is defined as the graph with vertex set being all subsets of $\{1,\ldots,2n+k\}$ of size $n$ and two vertices $A$ and $B$ being connected by an edge if $A\cap B =\emptyset$. We show that for any $k=O(n)$, the random walk on $K(2n+k,n)$ exhibits a cutoff at $\frac{1}{2}\log_{1+k/n}{(2n+k)}$ with a window of size $O(\frac{n}{k})$.

We study a natural process for allocating m balls into n bins that are organized as the vertices of an undirected graph G. Balls arrive one at a time. When a ball arrives, it first chooses a vertex u in G uniformly at random. Then the ball performs a local search in G starting from u until it reaches a vertex with local minimum load, where the ball is finally placed on. Then the next ball arrives and this procedure is repeated. For the case m = n, we give an upper bound for the maximum load on graphs with bounded degrees. We also propose the study of the cover time of this process, which is defined as the smallest m so that every bin has at least one ball allocated to it. We establish an upper bound for the cover time on graphs with bounded degrees. Our bounds for the maximum load and the cover time are tight when the graph is transitive or sufficiently homogeneous. We also give upper bounds for the maximum load when m > n.

We propose a natural process for allocating n balls into n bins that are organized as the vertices of an undirected graph G. Each ball first chooses a vertex u in G uniformly at random. Then the ball performs a local search in G starting from u until it reaches a vertex with local minimum load, where the ball is finally placed on. In our main result, we prove that this process yields a maximum load of only Θ(\log \log n) on expander graphs. In addition, we show that for d-dimensional grids the maximum load is Θ\Big(\big(\frac{\log n}{\log \log n}\big)^{\frac{1}{d+1}}\Big). Finally, for almost regular graphs with minimum degree Ω(\log n), we prove that the maximum load is constant and also reveal a fundamental difference between random and arbitrary tie-breaking rules.