arXiv++ Combinatorics

Let $n\geq k\geq 2$ be two integers and $S$ a subset of $\{0,1,\dots,k-1\}$. The graph $J_{S}(n,k)$ has as vertices the $k$-subsets of the $n$-set $[n]=\{1,\dots,n\}$ and two $k$-subsets $A$ and $B$ are adjacent if $|A\cap B|\in S$. In this paper, we use Godsil-McKay switching to prove that for $m\geq 0$, $k\geq \max(m+2,3)$ and $S = \{0, 1, ..., m\}$, the graphs $J_S(3k-2m-1,k)$ are not determined by spectrum and for $m\geq 2$, $n\geq 4m+2$ and $S = \{0,1,...,m\}$ the graphs $J_{S}(n,2m+1)$ are not determined by spectrum. We also report some computational searches for Godsil-McKay switching sets in the union of classes in the Johnson scheme for $k\leq 5$.

The hypergraph jump problem and the study of Lagrangians of uniform hypergraphs are two classical areas of study in the extremal graph theory. In this paper, we refine the concept of jumps to strong jumps and consider the analogous problems over non-uniform hypergraphs. Strong jumps have rich topological and algebraic structures. The non-strong-jump values are precisely the densities of the hereditary properties, which include the Turán densities of families of hypergraphs as special cases. Our method uses a generalized Lagrangian for non-uniform hypergraphs. We also classify all strong jump values for $\{1,2\}$-hypergraphs.

There is much recent interest in excluded subposets. Given a fixed poset $P$, how many subsets of $[n]$ can found without a copy of $P$ realized by the subset relation? The hardest and most intensely investigated problem of this kind is when $P$ is a diamond, i.e. the power set of a 2 element set. In this paper, we show infinitely many asymptotically tight constructions using random set families defined from posets based on Abelian groups. They are provided by the convergence of Markov chains on groups. Such constructions suggest that the diamond problem is hard.

Let $2^{[n]}$ denote the power set of $[n]:=\{1,2,..., n\}$. A collection $\B\subset 2^{[n]}$ forms a $d$-dimensional {\em Boolean algebra} if there exist pairwise disjoint sets $X_0, X_1,..., X_d \subseteq [n]$, all non-empty with perhaps the exception of $X_0$, so that $\B={X_0\cup \bigcup_{i\in I} X_i\colon I\subseteq [d]}$. Let $b(n,d)$ be the maximum cardinality of a family $\F\subset 2^X$ that does not contain a $d$-dimensional Boolean algebra. Gunderson, Rödl, and Sidorenko proved that $b(n,d) \leq c_d n^{-1/2^d} \cdot 2^n$ where $c_d= 10^d 2^{-2^{1-d}}d^{d-2^{-d}}$. In this paper, we use the Lubell function as a new measurement for large families instead of cardinality. The Lubell value of a family of sets $\F$ with $\F\subseteq \tsupn$ is defined by $h_n(\F):=\sum_{F\in \F}1/{n\choose |F|}$. We prove the following Turán type theorem. If $\F\subseteq 2^{[n]}$ contains no $d$-dimensional Boolean algebra, then $h_n(\F)\leq 2(n+1)^{1-2^{1-d}}$ for sufficiently large $n$. This results implies $b(n,d) \leq C n^{-1/2^d} \cdot 2^n$, where $C$ is an absolute constant independent of $n$ and $d$. As a consequence, we improve several Ramsey-type bounds on Boolean algebras. We also prove a canonical Ramsey theorem for Boolean algebras.

A non-uniform hypergraph $H=(V,E)$ consists of a vertex set $V$ and an edge set $E\subseteq 2^V$; the edges in $E$ are not required to all have the same cardinality. The set of all cardinalities of edges in $H$ is denoted by $R(H)$, the set of edge types. For a fixed hypergraph $H$, the Turán density $π(H)$ is defined to be $\lim_{n\to\infty}\max_{G_n}h_n(G_n)$, where the maximum is taken over all $H$-free hypergraphs $G_n$ on $n$ vertices satisfying $R(G_n)\subseteq R(H)$, and $h_n(G_n)$, the so called Lubell function, is the expected number of edges in $G_n$ hit by a random full chain. This concept, which generalizes the Turán density of $k$-uniform hypergraphs, is motivated by recent work on extremal poset problems. The details connecting these two areas will be revealed in the end of this paper. Several properties of Turán density, such as supersaturation, blow-up, and suspension, are generalized from uniform hypergraphs to non-uniform hypergraphs. Other questions such as "Which hypergraphs are degenerate?" are more complicated and don't appear to generalize well. In addition, we completely determine the Turán densities of ${1,2}$-hypergraphs.