arXiv++ Combinatorics

In the rendezvous problem, two parties with different labelings of the vertices of a complete graph are trying to meet at some vertex at the same time. It is well-known that if the parties have predetermined roles, then the strategy where one of them waits at one vertex, while the other visits all $n$ vertices in random order is optimal, taking at most $n$ steps and averaging about $n/2$. Anderson and Weber considered the symmetric rendezvous problem, where both parties must use the same randomized strategy. They analyzed strategies where the parties repeatedly play the optimal asymmetric strategy, determining their role independently each time by a biased coin-flip. By tuning the bias, Anderson and Weber achieved an expected meeting time of about $0.829 n$, which they conjectured to be asymptotically optimal. We change perspective slightly: instead of minimizing the expected meeting time, we seek to maximize the probability of meeting within a specified time $T$. The Anderson-Weber strategy, which fails with constant probability when $T= Θ(n)$, is not asymptotically optimal for large $T$ in this setting. Specifically, we exhibit a symmetric strategy that succeeds with probability $1-o(1)$ in $T=4n$ steps. This is tight: for any $α< 4$, any symmetric strategy with $T = αn$ fails with constant probability. Our strategy uses a new combinatorial object that we dub a "rendezvous code," which may be of independent interest. When $T \le n$, we show that the probability of meeting within $T$ steps is indeed asymptotically maximized by the Anderson-Weber strategy. Our results imply new lower bounds, showing that the best symmetric strategy takes at least $0.638 n$ steps in expectation. We also present some partial results for the symmetric rendezvous problem on other vertex-transitive graphs.

We consider Achlioptas processes for k-SAT formulas. We create a semi-random formula with n variables and m clauses, where each clause is a choice, made on-line, between two or more uniformly random clauses. Our goal is to delay the satisfiability/unsatisfiability transition, keeping the formula satisfiable up to densities m/n beyond the satisfiability threshold alpha_k for random k-SAT. We show that three choices suffice to raise the threshold for any k >= 3, and that two choices suffice for all 3 <= k <= 25. We also show that two choices suffice to lower the threshold for all k >= 3, making the formula unsatisfiable at a density below alpha_k.

If each edge (u,v) of a graph G=(V,E) is decorated with a permutation pi_{u,v} of k objects, we say that it has a permuted k-coloring if there is a coloring sigma from V to {1,...,k} such that sigma(v) is different from pi_{u,v}(sigma(u)) for all (u,v) in E. Based on arguments from statistical physics, we conjecture that the threshold d_k for permuted k-colorability in random graphs G(n,m=dn/2), where the permutations on the edges are uniformly random, is equal to the threshold for standard graph k-colorability. The additional symmetry provided by random permutations makes it easier to prove bounds on d_k. By applying the second moment method with these additional symmetries, and applying the first moment method to a random variable that depends on the number of available colors at each vertex, we bound the threshold within an additive constant. Specifically, we show that for any constant epsilon > 0, for sufficiently large k we have 2 k ln k - ln k - 2 - epsilon < d_k < 2 k ln k - ln k - 1 + epsilon. In contrast, the best known bounds on d_k for standard k-colorability leave an additive gap of about ln k between the upper and lower bounds.

We prove new lower bounds on the likely size of a maximum independent set in a random graph with a given average degree. Our method is a weighted version of the second moment method, where we give each independent set a weight based on the total degree of its vertices.