arXiv++ Combinatorics

There have been many efforts to count numerical semigroups by the genus and by the Frobenius number. It is known that the number of semigroups of each genus grows asymptotically with the genus like the Fibonacci numbers and that the number of semigroups of each Frobenius number grows asymptotically in such a way that each number doubles the previous but one. We prove a formula for the number of semigroups of each Frobenius number, genus, and multiplicity, under the assumption that the multiplicity $m$ and the Frobenius number $F$ satisfy $m\geq\frac{F+1}{3}$. This formula gives, under the required restriction, a multiparameter exact version of the increasing behaviours just mentioned. We also present two adaptations of the seeds algorithm to explore both the unleaved tree of numerical semigroups up to a given genus and the Frobenius-leaf-discriminating tree, whose leaves are exactly the semigroups of a given Frobenius number. For this purpose we adapted the recursive descending algorithm for trimming the tree exactly at those nodes with no descendants with a given genus, in the first case, or with no descendants with a given Frobenius number, in the second case. We refined the parallelizing strategies and we overcame the previous limitation of the length of integers in the bitwise representation of the gap sequence and the seed sequence. We extended the knowledge of three different sequences. We obtained $n_{78}, n_{79}, n_{80}$, we computed the number of semigroups of each Frobenius number up to 128, and we computed the number of irreducible numerical semigroups of each Frobenius number up to 128 as well. We also computed the multiparameter decomposition of the numbers in the first sequence up to genus 80 by the first three jumps, and the multiparameter decomposition of the numbers in the second sequence up to Frobenius number 128 by multiplicity and genus.

In this article we provide a formal framework for reidentification in general. We define n-confusion as a concept for modelling the anonymity of a database table and we prove that n-confusion is a generalization of k- anonymity. After a short survey on the different available definitions of k- anonymity for graphs we provide a new definition for k-anonymous graph, which we consider to be the correct definition. We provide a description of the k-anonymous graphs, both for the regular and the non-regular case. We also introduce the more flexible concept of (k,l)-anonymous graph. Our definition of (k,l)-anonymous graph is meant to replace a previous definition of (k, l)-anonymous graph, which we here prove to have severe weaknesses. Finally we provide a set of algorithms for k-anonymization of graphs.