arXiv++ Combinatorics

Given a hypergraph $\cH \subseteq 2^I \setminus \{\emptyset\}$ on the ground set $I = \{1, \ldots, n\}$, we assign to each $i \in I$ a nonnegative integer $x_i$, that is a pile of $x_i$ tokens, and consider the following generalization of the classical game of {\sc Nim}: Two players alternate turns. In a move a player chooses an arbitrary edge $H \in \cH$ and reduces all piles $i \in H$. The player who is out of moves loses. We call the obtained game hypergraph {\sc Nim}. Such a game is called proper {\sc Nim}, when $\cH=2^I \setminus\{I,\emptyset\}$ is the family of all proper subsets of $I$. Jenkyns and Mayberry \cite{JM80} described the Sprague-Grundy (or SG in short) function of these games. In this paper we introduce Tetris extensions of hypergraph {\sc Nim}, and obtain a closed formula for the SG functions of the extensions of proper {\sc Nim}, when $n\geq 3$. Surprisingly, the case of $n=2$ is much more complicated. For this case we only suggest several partial results and conjectures.

In this short note we give an example of a four-person finite positional game with perfect information that has no positions of chance and no Nash equilibria in pure stationary strategies. The corresponding directed graph has only one directed cycle and only five terminal positions. It remains open: (i) if the number $n$ of the players can be reduced from $4$ to $3$, (ii) if the number $p$ of the terminals can be reduced from $5$ to $4$, and most important, (iii) whether it is possible to get a similar example in which the outcome $c$ corresponding to all (possibly, more than one) directed cycles is worse than every terminal for each player. Yet, it is known that (j) $n$ cannot be reduced to $2$, (jj) $p$ cannot be reduced to $3$, and (jjj) there can be no similar example in which each player makes a decision in a unique position. Keywords: stochastic, positional, chess-like, transition-free games with perfect information and without moves of chance; Nash equilibrium, directed cycles (dicycles), terminal position.

A circulant is a Cayley graph over a cyclic group. A well-covered graph is a graph in which all maximal stable sets are of the same size, or in other words, they are all maximum. A CIS graph is a graph in which every maximal stable set and every maximal clique intersect. It is not difficult to show that a circulant G is a CIS graph if and only if G and its complement are both well-covered and the product of the independence and the clique numbers of G is equal to the number of vertices. It is also easy to demonstrate that both families, the circulants and the CIS graphs, are closed with respect to the operations of taking the complement and lexicographic product. We study the structure of the CIS circulants. It is well-known that all P_4-free graphs are CIS. In this paper, in addition to the simple family of the P_4-free circulants, we construct a non-trivial sparse but infinite family of CIS circulants. We are not aware of any CIS circulant that could not be obtained from graphs in this family by the operations of taking the complement and lexicographic product.