arXiv++ Combinatorics

A number $N$ is a triangular number if it can be written as $N = t(t + 1)/2$ for some nonnegative integer number $t$. A triangular number $N$ is called square if it is a perfect square, that is, $N = d^2$ for some integer number $d$. Square triangular numbers were characterized by Euler in 1778 and are in one-to-one correspondence with the so-called near-isosceles Pythagorean triples $(k,k+1,l)$, where $k^2 + (k+1)^2 = l^2$. A quadratic number is the product $Π= Π(k,j) = k(k+1)(k+j)(k+j+1)$ for some nonnegative integer numbers $k$ and $j$. By definition, it is the product of two triangular numbers and 4. Quadratic number $Π$ and the corresponding pair $(k,j)$ are called square if $Π$ is a perfect square. Clearly, $(k,j)$ is square if both triangular numbers $k(k+1)/2$ and $(k+j)(k+j+1)/2$ are perfect squares. Yet, there exist infinitely many other square quadratic numbers. We construct polynomials $j_i(k)$ of degree $i$ with positive integer coefficients satisfying equations: $k + j_{2 \ell}(k) + 1 = k [a_\ell k^\ell + \dots + a_1 k + a_0]^2 +1 = (k+1) [b_\ell k^\ell + \dots + b_1 k + b_0]^2$ and \newline $k + j_{2\ell+1}(k) + 1 = k(k+1) [a_\ell k^\ell + \dots + a_1 k + a_0]^2 + 1 = [b_{\ell+1} k^{\ell+1}+b_\ell k^\ell + \dots + b_1 k + b_0]^2$ for some positive integer $\ell$ and some coefficients $a_i, b_j$, $i=0, \ldots, \ell, j=0, \ldots, \ell+1$. All the obtained pairs $(k, j_i(k))$ are square. We conjecture that the products of square triangular numbers and pairs $(k, j_i(k))$ cover all quadratic squares. Additionally, we identify pairs of intervals of successive integers with equal sums of squares.

Given integer $n > 0$ and $m > 1$, we call a partition of set $[n] = \{1, \dots, n\}$ {\em $m$-good} if each of the partitioning sets is of size at most $m$ and the sum of numbers in it is a power of $m$, that is, $m^t$ for some $t \geq 0$. It is easily seen that a unique 2-good partition exists for each $n$ and, in contrast, for each fixed $m>3$, for infinitely many $n$, no $m$-good partition exists. Case $m=3$ is more difficult. We conjecture that 3-good partitions exist for each $n$ and prove that a minimal counter-example, if any, is at least 101 and must belong to the set {\centering $N_o = \{n \equiv 2 \pmod 3\} \cap \{3^t+1 < n < (3^{t+1}+1)/2 \mid t \geq 4\}.$ } For this case we provide some partial results. We also show that a 3-good partition is unique if $n \in N_u = \{1, 2, 3, 4, 3^t-4, 3^t-2, 3^t-1, 3^t, 3^t+1, 3^t+2, 3^t+3 \mid t > 1\}$ and conjecture that the inverse holds too.

We construct a finite deterministic graphical (DG) game without Nash equilibria in pure stationary strategies. This game has 3 players $I=\{1,2,3\}$ and 5 outcomes: 2 terminal $a_1$ and $a_2$ and 3 cyclic. Furthermore, for 2 players a terminal outcome is the best: $a_1$ for player 3 and $a_2$ for player 1. Hence, the rank vector $r$ is at most $(1,2,1)$. Here $r_i$ is the number of terminal outcomes that are worse than some cyclic outcome for the player $i \in I$. This is a counterexample to conjecture ``Catch 22" from the paper ``On Nash-solvability of finite $n$-person DG games, Catch 22" (2021) arXiv:2111.06278, according to which, at least 2 entries of $r$ are at least 2 for any NE-free game. However, Catch 22 remains still open for the games with a unique cyclic outcome, not to mention a weaker (and more important) conjecture claiming that an $n$-person finite DG game has a Nash equilibrium (in pure stationary strategies) when $r = (0^n)$, that is, all $n$ entries of $r$ are 0; in other words, when the following condition holds: $\qquad\bullet$ ($C_0$) any terminal outcome is better than every cyclic one for each player. A game is play-once if each player controls a unique position. It is known that any play-once game satisfying ($C_0$) has a Nash equilibrium. We give a new and very short proof of this statement. Yet, not only conjunction but already disjunction of the above two conditions may be sufficient for Nash-solvability. This is still open.

Given a hypergraph $H$, the dual hypergraph of $H$ is the hypergraph of all minimal transversals of $H$. A hypergraph is conformal if it is the family of maximal cliques of a graph. In a recent work, Boros, Gurvich, Milanič, and Uno (Journal of Graph Theory, 2025) studied conformality of dual hypergraphs and proved several results related to this property, leading in particular to a polynomial-time algorithm for recognizing graphs in which all minimal transversals of maximal cliques have size at most $k$, for any fixed $k$. In this follow-up work, we provide a novel aspect to the study of graph clique transversals, by considering the dual conformality property from the perspective of graphs. More precisely, we study graphs for which the family of minimal transversals of maximal cliques is conformal. Such graphs are called clique dually conformal (CDC for short). It turns out that the class of CDC graphs is a rich generalization of the class of $P_4$-free graphs. As our main results, we completely characterize CDC graphs within the families of triangle-free graphs and split graphs. Both characterizations lead to polynomial-time recognition algorithms. Generalizing the fact that every $P_4$-free graph is CDC, we also show that the class of CDC graphs is closed under substitution, in the strong sense that substituting a graph $H$ for a vertex of a graph $G$ results in a CDC graph if and only if both $G$ and $H$ are CDC.

An amoeba is a tree together with instructions how to iteratively grow trees by adding paths of a fixed length $\ell$. This paper analyses such a growth process. An amoeba is mortal if all versions of the process are finite, and it is immortal if they are all infinite. We obtain some necessary and some sufficient conditions for mortality. In particular, for growing caterpillars in the case $\ell=1$ we characterize mortal amoebas. We discuss variations of the mortality concept, conjecture that some of them are equivalent, and support this conjecture for $\ell\in\{1,2\}$.

Given integers $n,k,\ell$ such that $0<k<n, \; 1<\ell$ and an integer vector $x = (x_1,\ldots,x_n)$; denote by $m = m(x)$ the number of entries of $x$ that are multiple of $\ell$. Choose $n-k$ entries of $x$ as follows: if $n-k \leq m(x)$, take $n-k$ smallest entries of $x$ multiple of $\ell$; if $n-k > m(x)$, take all $m$ such entries, if any, and add remaining $n-k-m$ entries arbitrarily, for example, take the largest ones. In one step, the chosen $n-k$ entries (bears) keep their values, while the remaining $k$ (bulls) are reduced by 1. Repeat such steps getting the sequence $S = S(n,k,\ell,x^0) = (x^0 \to x^1 \to \ldots \to x^j \to \ldots)$. It is ``quasi-periodic". More precisely, there is a function $N = N(n,k,\ell,x^0)$ such that for all $j \geq N$ we have $m(x^j) \geq n-k$ and $range(x^j) \leq \ell$, where $range(x) = (\max(x_i \mid i \in [n]) - \min(x_i \mid i \in [n])$. Furthermore, $N$ is a polynomial in $n,k,\ell,$ and $range(x^0)$ and can be computed in time linear in $n,k,\ell$, and $\log(1 + range(x^0))$. After $N$ steps, the system moves ``like a screw". Assuming that $x_1 \leq \dots \leq x_n$, introduce the cyclical order on $[n] = \{1, \ldots, n\}$ considering 1 and $n$ as neighbors. Then, bears and bulls partition $[n]$ into two intervals, rotating by the angle $2 πk /n$ with every $\ell$ steps. Furthermore, after every $p = \ell n / GCD(n,k) = \ell LCM(n,k) / k$ steps all entries of $x$ are reduced by the same value $δ= pk/n$, that is, $x_i^{j+p} - x_i^j = δ$ for all $i \in [n]$ and $j \geq N$. We provide an algorithm computing $N$ (and $x^j$) in time linear in $n,k,\ell, \log(1 + range(x^0))$ (and $\log (1+j)$). In case $k=n-1$ and $\ell = 2$ such screw dynamical system are applicable to impartial games.

We compare to different extensions of the ancient game of nim: Moore's nim$(n, \leq k)$ and exact nim$(n, = k)$. Given integers $n$ and $k$ such that $0 < k \leq n$, we consider $n$ piles of stones. Two players alternate turns. By one move it is allowed to choose and reduce any (i) at most $k$ or (ii) exactly $k$ piles of stones in games nim$(n, \leq k)$ and nim$(n, = k)$, respectively. The player who has to move but cannot is the loser. Both games coincide with nim when $k=1$. Game nim$(n, \leq k)$ was introduced by Moore (1910) who characterized its Sprague-Grundy (SG) values 0 (that is, P-positions) and 1. The first open case is SG values 2 for nim$(4, \leq 2)$. Game nim$(n, = k)$, was introduced in 2018. An explicit formula for its SG function was computed for $2k \geq n$. In contrast, case $2k < n$ seems difficult: even the P-positions are not known already for nim$(5,=2)$. Yet, it seems that the P-position of games nim$(n+1,=2)$ and nim$(n+1,\leq 2)$ are closely related. (Note that P-positions of the latter are known.) Here we provide some theoretical and computational evidence of such a relation for $n=5$.

Given integer $n$ and $k$ such that $0 < k \leq n$ and $n$ piles of stones, two players alternate turns. By one move it is allowed to choose any $k$ piles and remove exactly one stone from each. The player who has to move but cannot is the loser. in the normal version of the game and (s)he is the winner in the misère version. Cases $k=1$ and $k = n$ are trivial. For $k=2$ the game was solved for $n \leq 6$. For $n \leq 4$ the Sprague-Grundy function was efficiently computed (for both versions). For $n = 5,6$ a polynomial algorithm computing P-positions was obtained for the normal version. \newline Then, for the case $k = n-1$, a very simple explicit rule that determines the Smith remoteness function was found for the normal version of the game: the player who has to move keeps a pile with the minimum even number of stones; if all piles have odd number of stones then (s)he keeps a maximum one, while the $n-1$ remaining piles are reduced by one stone each in accordance with the rules of the game. \newline Computations show that the same rule works efficiently for the misère version too. The exceptions are sparse and are listed in Section 2. Denote a position by $x = (x_1, \dots, x_n)$. Due to symmetry, we can assume wlog that $x_1 \leq \ldots \leq x_n$. Our computations partition all exceptions into the following three families: $x_1$ is even, $x_1 = 1$, and $x_1 \geq 3$ is odd. In all three cases we suggest explicit formulas that cover all found exceptions, but this is not proven.

Given integer $n \geq 1, \ell \geq 2$, and vector $x = (x_1, \ldots, x_n)$ that has an entry which is a multiple of $\ell$ and such that $x_1 \leq \ldots \leq x_n$, the GM-rule is defined as follows: Keep the rightmost minimal entry $x_i$ of $x$, which is a multiple of $\ell$ and reduce the remaining $n-1$ entries of $x$ by~1. We will call such $i$ the {\em pivot} and $x_i$ the {\em pivotal entry}. The GM-rule respects monotonicity of the entries. It uniquely determines a GM-move $x^0 \to x^1$ and an infinite GM-sequence $S$ that consists of successive GM-moves $x = x^0 \to x^1 \to \ldots \to x^j \to \ldots$ . If $range(x) = x_n - x_1 \leq \ell$ then for all $j \geq 0$: (i) $range(x^j) \leq \ell$; (ii) the pivot of $x^{j + \ell}$ is one less than the pivot of $x^j$, assuming that $1 - 1 = 0 = n$. (iii) $x_i^j - x_i^{j + n \ell} = (n-1) \ell$ for all $i = 1,\ldots,n$. Due to (iii), we compute $x^j$ in time linear in $n, \ell, \log(j)$, and $\sum^n_{i=1}\log(|x_i|+1)$. For $\ell = 2$ a slighty modified version of the GM-rule was recently introduced by Gurvich, Martynov, Maximchuk, and Vyalyi, "On Remoteness Functions of Exact Slow $k$-NIM with $k+1$ Piles", arXiv:2304.06498 (2023), where applications to impartial games were considered.

We study remoteness function $\mathcal R$ of impartial games introduced by Smith in 1966. The player who moves from a position $x$ can win if and only if $\mathcal R(x)$ is odd. The odd values of $\mathcal R(x)$ show how soon the winner can win, while even values show how long the loser can resist, provided both players play optimally. This function can be applied to the conjunctive compounds of impartial games, in the same way as the Sprague-Grundy function is applicable to their disjunctive compounds. We provide polynomial algorithms computing $\mathcal R(x)$ for games Euclid and generalized Wythoff. For Moore's NIM we give a simple explicit formula for $\mathcal R(x)$ if it is even and show that computing it becomes an NP-hard problem for the odd values.

Given a hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$, the dual hypergraph of $\mathcal{H}$ is the hypergraph of all minimal transversals of $\mathcal{H}$. The dual hypergraph is always Sperner, that is, no hyperedge contains another. A special case of Sperner hypergraphs are the conformal Sperner hypergraphs, which correspond to the families of maximal cliques of graphs. All these notions play an important role in many fields of mathematics and computer science, including combinatorics, algebra, database theory, etc. In this paper we study conformality of dual hypergraphs and prove several results related to the problem of recognizing this property. In particular, we show that the problem is in co-NP and can be solved in polynomial time for hypergraphs of bounded dimension. In the special case of dimension $3$, we reduce the problem to $2$-Satisfiability. Our approach has an implication in algorithmic graph theory: we obtain a polynomial-time algorithm for recognizing graphs in which all minimal transversals of maximal cliques have size at most $k$, for any fixed $k$.

In several recent papers some concepts of convex analysis were extended to discrete sets. This paper is one more step in this direction. It is well known that a local minimum of a convex function is always its global minimum. We study some discrete objects that share this property and provide several examples of convex families related to graphs and to two-person games in normal form.

The concept of avoidable paths in graphs was introduced by Beisegel, Chudnovsky, Gurvich, Milanič, and Servatius in 2019 as a common generalization of avoidable vertices and simplicial paths. In 2020, Bonamy, Defrain, Hatzel, and Thiebaut proved that every graph containing an induced path of order $k$ also contains an avoidable induced path of the same order. They also asked whether one could generalize this result to other avoidable structures, leaving the notion of avoidability up to interpretation. In this paper we address this question: we specify the concept of avoidability for arbitrary graphs equipped with two terminal vertices. We provide both positive and negative results, some of which appear to be related to the recent work by Chudnovsky, Norin, Seymour, and Turcotte [arXiv:2301.13175].

Let $\mathcal{A} = \{A_1, \ldots, A_m\}$ and $\mathcal{B} = \{B_1, \ldots, B_n\}$ be a pair of dual multi-hypergraphs on the common ground set $O = \{o_1, \ldots, o_k\}$. Note that each of them may have embedded or equal edges. An edge is called containment minimal (or just minimal, for short) if it is not a strict superset of another edge. Yet, equal minimal edges may exist. By duality, (i) $A \cap B \neq \emptyset$ for every pair $A \in \mathcal{A}$ and $B \in \mathcal{B}$; (ii) if $A$ is minimal then for every $o \in A$ there exists a $B \in \mathcal{B}$ such that $A \cap B = \{o\}$. We will extend claim (ii) as follows. A linear order $\succ$ over $O$ defines a unique lexicographic order $\succ_L$ over the $2^O$. Let $A$ be a lexicographically maximal (lexmax) edge of $\mathcal{A}$. Then, (iii) $A$ is minimal and for every $o \in A$ there exists a minimal $B \in \mathcal{B}$ such that $A \cap B = \{o\}$ and $o \succeq o'$ for each $o' \in B$. This property has important applications in game theory implying Nash-solvability of tight game forms as shown in the old (1975 and 1989) work of the first author. Here we give a new, very short, proof of (iii). Edges $A$ and $B$ mentioned in (iii) can be found out in polynomial time. This is trivial if $\mathcal{A}$ and $\mathcal{B}$ are given explicitly. Yet, it is true even if only $\mathcal{A}$ is given, and not explicitly, but by a polynomial containment oracle, which for a subset $O_A \subseteq O$ answers in polynomial time whether $O_A$ contains an edge of $\mathcal{A}$.

We consider finite two-person normal form games. The following four properties of their game forms are equivalent: (i) Nash-solvability, (ii) zero-sum-solvability, (iii) win-lose-solvability, and (iv) tightness. For (ii, iii, iv) this was shown by Edmonds and Fulkerson in 1970. Then, in 1975, (i) was added to this list and it was also shown that these results cannot be generalized for $n$-person case with $n > 2$. In 1990, tightness was extended to vector game forms ($v$-forms) and it was shown that such $v$-tightness and zero-sum-solvability are still equivalent, yet, do not imply Nash-solvability. These results are applicable to several classes of stochastic games with perfect information. Here we suggest one more extension of tightness introducing $v^+$-tight vector game forms ($v^+$-forms). We show that such $v^+$-tightness and Nash-solvability are equivalent in case of weakly rectangular game forms and positive cost functions. This result allows us to reduce the so-called bi-shortest path conjecture to $v^+$-tightness of $v^+$-forms. However, both (equivalent) statements remain open.

We consider finite $n$-person deterministic graphical (DG) games. These games are modelled by finite directed graphs (digraphs) $G$ which may have directed cycles and, hence, infinite plays. Yet, it is assumed that all these plays are equivalent and form a single outcome $c$, while the terminal vertices $V_T = \{a_1, \ldots, a_p\}$ form $p$ remaining outcomes. We study the existence of Nash equilibria (NE) in pure stationary strategies. It is known that NE exist when $n=2$ and may fail to exist when $n > 2$. Yet, the question becomes open for $n > 2$ under the following extra condition: (C) For each of $n$ players, $c$ is worse than each of $p$ terminal outcomes. In other words, all players are interested in terminating the play, which is a natural assumption. Moreover, Nash-solvability remains open even if we replace (C) by a weaker condition: (C22) There exist no two players for whom $c$ is better than (at least) two terminal outcomes. We conjecture that such two players exist in each NE-free DG game, or in other words, that (C22) implies Nash-solvability, for all $n$. Recently, the DG games were extended to a wider class of the DG multi-stage (DGMS) games, whose outcomes are the strongly connected components (SCC) of digraph $G$. Merging all outcomes of a DGMS game that correspond to its non-terminal SCCs we obtain a DG game. Clearly, this operation respects Nash-solvability (NS). Basic conditions and conjectures related to NS can be extended from the DG to DGMS games: in both cases NE exist if $n=2$ and may fail to exist when $n > 2$; furthermore, we modify conditions (C) and (C22) to adapt them for the DGMS games. Keywords: $n$-person deterministic graphical (multi-stage) games, Nash equilibrium, Nash-solvability, pure stationary strategy, digraph, directed cycle, strongly connected component.

In 1975 the first author proved that every finite tight two-person game form $g$ is Nash-solvable, that is, for every payoffs $u$ and $w$ of two players the obtained game $(g;u,w)$, in normal form, has a Nash equilibrium (NE) in pure strategies. This result was extended in several directions; here we strengthen it further. We construct two special NE realized by a lexicographically safe (lexsafe) strategy of one player and a best response of the other. We obtain a polynomial algorithm computing these lexsafe NE. This is trivial when game form $g$ is given explicitly. Yet, in applications $g$ is frequently realized by an oracle $\cO$ such that size of $g$ is exponential in size $|\cO|$ of $\cO$. We assume that game form $g = g(\cO)$ generated by $\cO$ is tight and that an arbitrary {\em win-lose game} $(g;u,w)$ (in which payoffs $u$ and $w$ are zero-sum and take only values $\pm 1$) can be solved, in time polynomial in $|\cO|$. These assumptions allow us to construct an algorithm computing two (one for each player) lexsafe NE in time polynomial in $|\cO|$. We consider four types of oracles known in the literature and show that all four satisfy the above assumptions.

We consider graphical $n$-person games with perfect information that have no Nash equilibria in pure stationary strategies. Solving these games in mixed strategies, we introduce probabilistic distributions in all non-terminal positions. The corresponding plays can be analyzed under two different basic assumptions: Markov's and a priori realizations. The former one guarantees existence of a uniformly best response of each player in every situation. Nevertheless, Nash equilibrium may fail to exist even in mixed strategies. The classical Nash theorem is not applicable, since Markov's realizations may result in the limit distributions and effective payoff functions that are not continuous. The a priori realization does not share many nice properties of the Markov one (for example, existence of the uniformly best response) but in return, Nash's theorem is applicable. We illustrate both realizations in details by two examples with $2$ and $3$ players and also provide some general results.

Given $n$ piles of tokens and a positive integer $k \leq n$, the game Nim$^1_{n, =k}$ of exact slow $k$-Nim is played as follows. Two players move alternately. In each move, a player chooses exactly $k$ non-empty piles and removes one token from each of them. A player whose turn it is to move but has no move loses (if the normal version of the game is played, and wins if it is the misére version). In Integers 20 (2020) 1-19, Gurvich et al gave an explicit formula for the Sprague-Grundy function of Nim$^1_{4, =2}$, for both its normal and misére version. Here we extend this result and obtain an explicit formula for the P-positions of the normal version of Nim$^1_{5, =2}$ and Nim$^1_{6, =2}$.

A transshipment problem (G, d, λ) is modeled by a directed graph G = (V, E) with weighted vertices d = (d_v | v \in V) and directed edges λ= (λ_e | e \in E) interpreted as follows: G is a communication or transportation network, e.g., a pipeline; each edge e \in E is a one-way communication line, road or pipe of capacity λ_e, while every vertex v \in V is a node of production d_v > 0, consumption d_v < 0, or transition d_v = 0. A non-negative flow x = (x_e \mid e \in E) is called weakly feasible if for each v \in V the algebraic sum of flows, over all directed edges incident to v, equals d_v; or shorter, if A_G x = d, where A_G is the vertex-edge incidence matrix of G. A weakly feasible flow x is called feasible if x_e \leq λ_e for all e \in E. We consider weakly feasible but not necessarily feasible flows, that is, inequalities x_e > λ_e are allowed. However, such an excess is viewed as unwanted (dangerous) and so we minimize the excess ratio vector r = (r_e = x_e / λ_e | e \in E) lexicographically. More precisely, first, we look for the weakly feasible flows minimizing the maximum of re over all e in E; among all such flows we look for those that minimize the second largest coordinate of r, etc. Clearly, |E| such steps define a unique balanced flow, which provides the lexmin solution for problem (G, d, λ). We construct it in polynomial time, provided vectors d and λare integer. For symmetric digraphs the problem was solved by Gurvich and Gvishiani in 1984. Here we extend this result to directed graphs. Furthermore, we simplify the algorithm and proofs applying the classic criterion of existence of a feasible flow for (G, d, λ) obtained by Gale and Hoffman in late 1950-s.