arXiv++ Combinatorics

We compare to different extensions of the ancient game of nim: Moore's nim$(n, \leq k)$ and exact nim$(n, = k)$. Given integers $n$ and $k$ such that $0 < k \leq n$, we consider $n$ piles of stones. Two players alternate turns. By one move it is allowed to choose and reduce any (i) at most $k$ or (ii) exactly $k$ piles of stones in games nim$(n, \leq k)$ and nim$(n, = k)$, respectively. The player who has to move but cannot is the loser. Both games coincide with nim when $k=1$. Game nim$(n, \leq k)$ was introduced by Moore (1910) who characterized its Sprague-Grundy (SG) values 0 (that is, P-positions) and 1. The first open case is SG values 2 for nim$(4, \leq 2)$. Game nim$(n, = k)$, was introduced in 2018. An explicit formula for its SG function was computed for $2k \geq n$. In contrast, case $2k < n$ seems difficult: even the P-positions are not known already for nim$(5,=2)$. Yet, it seems that the P-position of games nim$(n+1,=2)$ and nim$(n+1,\leq 2)$ are closely related. (Note that P-positions of the latter are known.) Here we provide some theoretical and computational evidence of such a relation for $n=5$.

We study remoteness function $\mathcal R$ of impartial games introduced by Smith in 1966. The player who moves from a position $x$ can win if and only if $\mathcal R(x)$ is odd. The odd values of $\mathcal R(x)$ show how soon the winner can win, while even values show how long the loser can resist, provided both players play optimally. This function can be applied to the conjunctive compounds of impartial games, in the same way as the Sprague-Grundy function is applicable to their disjunctive compounds. We provide polynomial algorithms computing $\mathcal R(x)$ for games Euclid and generalized Wythoff. For Moore's NIM we give a simple explicit formula for $\mathcal R(x)$ if it is even and show that computing it becomes an NP-hard problem for the odd values.

Given $n$ piles of tokens and a positive integer $k \leq n$, the game Nim$^1_{n, =k}$ of exact slow $k$-Nim is played as follows. Two players move alternately. In each move, a player chooses exactly $k$ non-empty piles and removes one token from each of them. A player whose turn it is to move but has no move loses (if the normal version of the game is played, and wins if it is the misére version). In Integers 20 (2020) 1-19, Gurvich et al gave an explicit formula for the Sprague-Grundy function of Nim$^1_{4, =2}$, for both its normal and misére version. Here we extend this result and obtain an explicit formula for the P-positions of the normal version of Nim$^1_{5, =2}$ and Nim$^1_{6, =2}$.

We study algorithmic complexity of solving subtraction games in a~fixed dimension with a finite difference set. We prove that there exists a game in this class such that any algorithm solving the game runs in exponential time. Also we prove an existence of a game in this class such that solving the game is PSPACE-hard. The results are based on the construction introduced by Larsson and Wästlund. It relates subtraction games and cellular automata.