arXiv++ Combinatorics

Frameproof codes are a class of secure codes introduced by Boneh and Shaw in the context of digital fingerprinting, and have been widely studied from a combinatorial point of view. In this paper, we study a quantitative extension of frameproof codes and hypergraphs, referred to as {\it quantitative frameproof codes and hypergraphs}. We give asymptotically optimal bounds on the maximum sizes of these structures and determine their exact sizes for a broad range of parameters. In particular, we introduce a generalized version of the Erdős matching number in our proof and derive relevant estimates for it.

Codes over trees were introduced recently to bridge graph theory and coding theory with diverse applications in computer science and beyond. A central challenge lies in determining the maximum number of labelled trees over $n$ nodes with pairwise distance at least $d$, denoted by $A(n,d)$, where the distance between any two labelled trees is the minimum number of edit edge operations in order to transform one tree to another. By various tools from graph theory and algebra, we show that when $n$ is large, $A(n,d)=O((Cn)^{n-d})$ for any $d\leq n-2$, and $A(n,d)=Ω((cn)^{n-d})$ for any $d$ linear with $n$, where constants $c\in(0,1)$ and $C\in [1/2,1)$ depending on $d$. Previously, only $A(n,d)=O(n^{n-d-1})$ for fixed $d$ and $A(n,d)=Ω(n^{n-2d})$ for $d\leq n/2$ were known, while the upper bound is improved for any $d$ and the lower bound is improved for $d\geq 2\sqrt{n}$. Further, for any fixed integer $k$, we prove the existence of codes of size $Ω(n^k)$ when $n-d=o(n)$, and give explicit constructions of codes which show $A(n,n-4)=Ω(n^2)$ and $A(n,n-13)=Ω(n^3)$.

We study the reconstruction problem of permutation sequences from their $k$-minors, which are subsequences of length $k$ with entries renumbered by $1,2,\ldots,k$ preserving order. We prove that the minimum number $k$ such that any permutation of length $n$ can be reconstructed from the multiset of its $k$-minors is between $\exp{(Ω(\sqrt{\ln n}))}$ and $O(\sqrt{n\ln n})$. These results imply better bounds of a well-studied parameter $N_d$, which is the smallest number such that any permutation of length $n\ge N_d$ can be reconstructed by its $(n-d)$-minors. The new bounds are $ d+\exp(Ω(\sqrt{\ln d}))<N_d<d+O(\sqrt{d\ln d})$ asymptotically, and the previous bounds were $d+\log_2 d<N_d<d^2/4+2d+4$.

A \emph{trace} of a sequence is generated by deleting each bit of the sequence independently with a fixed probability. The well-studied \emph{trace reconstruction} problem asks how many traces are required to reconstruct an unknown binary sequence with high probability. In this paper, we study the multivariate version of this problem for matrices and hypermatrices, where a trace is generated by deleting each row/column of the matrix or each slice of the hypermatrix independently with a constant probability. Previously, Krishnamurthy et al. showed that $\exp(\widetilde{O}(n^{d/(d+2)}))$ traces suffice to reconstruct any unknown $n\times n$ matrix (for $d=2$) and any unknown $n^{\times d}$ hypermatrix. By developing a dimension reduction procedure and establishing a multivariate version of the Littlewood-type result, we improve this upper bound by showing that $\exp(\widetilde{O}(n^{3/7}))$ traces suffice to reconstruct any unknown $n\times n$ matrix, and $\exp(\widetilde{O}(n^{3/5}))$ traces suffice to reconstruct any unknown $n^{\times d}$ hypermatrix. This breaks the tendency to trivial $\exp(O(n))$ as the dimension $d$ grows.

For a given $n$, what is the smallest number $k$ such that every sequence of length $n$ is determined by the multiset of all its $k$-subsequences? This is called the $k$-deck problem for sequence reconstruction, and has been generalized to the two-dimensional case -- reconstruction of $n\times n$-matrices from submatrices. Previous works show that the smallest $k$ is at most $O(n^\frac{1}{2})$ for sequences and at most $O(n^\frac{2}{3})$ for matrices. We study this $k$-deck problem for general dimension $d$ and prove that, the smallest $k$ is at most $O(n^\frac{d}{d+1})$ for reconstructing a $d$ dimensional hypermatrix of order $n$ from the multiset of all its subhypermatrices of order $k$.