arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Wuxian Chen

3 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2026-07-19
The number of perfect matchings in 3-connected planar graphs
A graph is matchable if it admits a perfect matching. Recently, Goedgebeur et al. asked whether there exists a constant $c<12$ such that infinitely many matchable planar $3$-connected graphs, each with exactly $c$ perfect matchings. We prove that every matchable planar $3$-connected graphs on at least 40 vertices has at least 12 perfect matchings, and this lower bound is sharp. This answers the question negatively.
2025-08-29
Nice vertices in cubic graphs
Published in Discrete Mathematics, 348 (2025) 114553 • View PublicationBIB
A subgraph $G'$ of a graph $G$ is nice if $G-V(G')$ has a perfect matching. Nice subgraphs play a vital role in the theory of ear decomposition and matching minors of matching covered graphs. A vertex $u$ of a cubic graph is nice if $u$ and its neighbors induce a nice subgraph. D. Král et al. (2010) [9] showed that each vertex of a cubic brick is nice. It is natural to ask how many nice vertices a matching covered cubic graph has. In this paper, using some basic results of matching covered graphs, we prove that if a non-bipartite cubic graph $G$ is 2-connected, then $G$ has at least 4 nice vertices; if $G$ is 3-connected and $G\neq K_4$, then $G$ has at least 6 nice vertices. We also determine all the corresponding extremal graphs. For a cubic bipartite graph $G$ with bipartition $(A,B)$, a pair of vertices $a\in A$ and $b\in B$ is called a nice pair if $a$ and $b$ together with their neighbors induce a nice subgraph. We show that a connected cubic bipartite graph $G$ is a brace if and only if each pair of vertices in distinct color classes is a nice pair. In general, we prove that $G$ has at least 9 nice pairs of vertices and $K_{3,3}$ is the only extremal graph.
2024-06-06 v2
Solution to a conjecture on resistance distances of block tower graphs
Let $G$ be a connected graph. The resistance distance between two vertices $u$ and $v$ of $G$, denoted by $R_{G}[u,v]$, is defined as the net effective resistance between them in the electric network constructed from $G$ by replacing each edge with a unit resistor. The resistance diameter of $G$, denoted by $D_{r}(G)$, is defined as the maximum resistance distance among all pairs of vertices of $G$. Let $P_n=a_1a_2\ldots a_n$ be the $n$-vertex path graph and $C_{4}=b_{1}b_2b_3b_4b_{1}$ be the 4-cycle. Then the $n$-th block tower graph $G_n$ is defined as the the Cartesian product of $P_n$ and $C_4$, that is, $G_n=P_{n}\square C_4$. Clearly, the vertex set of $G_n$ is $\{(a_i,b_j)|i=1,\ldots,n;j=1,\ldots,4\}$. In [Discrete Appl. Math. 320 (2022) 387--407], Evans and Francis proposed the following conjecture on resistance distances of $G_n$ and $G_{n+1}$: \begin{equation*} \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}\left(R_{G_{n+1}}[(a_{1},b_1),(a_{n+1},b_3)]-R_{G_{n}}[(a_{1},b_1),(a_{n},b_3)]\right)=\frac{1}{4}. \end{equation*} In this paper, combining algebraic methods and electrical network approaches, we confirm and further generalize this conjecture. In addition, we determine all the resistance diametrical pairs in $G_n$, which enables us to give an equivalent explanation of the conjecture.