arXiv++ Combinatorics

A graph is called equimatchable if all of its maximal matchings have the same size. Due to Eiben and Kotrbčík,, any connected graph with odd order and independence number $α(G)$ at most $2$ is equimatchable. Akbari et al. showed that for any odd number $r$, a connected equimatchable $r$-regular graph must be either the complete graph $K_{r+1}$ or the complete bipartite graph $K_{r,r}$. They also determined all connected equimatchable $4$-regular graphs and proved that for any even $r$, any connected equimatchable $r$-regular graph is either $K_{r,r}$ or factor-critical. In this paper, we confirm that for any even $r\ge 6$, there exists a unique connected equimatchable $r$-regular graph $G$ with $α(G)\geq 3$ and odd order.

In this paper, we mainly investigate $K_{1,2}$-structure-connectivity for any connected graph. Let $G$ be a connected graph with $n$ vertices, we show that $κ(G; K_{1,2})$ is well-defined if $diam(G)\geq 4$, or $n\equiv 1\pmod 3$, or $G\notin \{C_{5},K_{n}\}$ when $n\equiv 2\pmod 3$, or there exist three vertices $u,v,w$ such that $N_{G}(u)\cap (N_{G}(v,w)\cup\{v,w\})=\emptyset$ when $n\equiv 0\pmod 3$. Furthermore, if $G$ has $K_{1,2}$-structure-cut, we prove $κ(G)/3\leqκ(G; K_{1,2})\leqκ(G)$.

Edmonds, Lovász, and Pulleyblank showed that if a matching covered graph has a nontrivial tight cut, then it also has a nontrivial ELP-cut. Carvalho et al. gave a stronger conjecture: if a matching covered graph has a nontrivial tight cut $C$, then it also has a nontrivial ELP-cut that does not cross $C$. Chen, et al gave a proof of the conjecture. This note is inspired by the paper of Carvalho et al. We give a simplified proof of the conjecture, and prove the following result which is slightly stronger than the conjecture: if a nontrivial tight cut $C$ of a matching covered graph $G$ is not an ELP-cut, then there is a sequence $G_1=G, G_2,\ldots,G_r, r\geq2$ of matching covered graphs, such that for $i=1, 2,\ldots, r-1$, $G_i$ has an ELP-cut $C_i$, and $G_{i+1}$ is a $C_i$-contraction of $G_i$, and $C$ is a $2$-separation cut of $G_r$.

Let $G=(V,E)$ be a matching-covered graph and $X$ be an edge set of $G$. $X$ is said to be feasible if there exist two perfect matchings $M_1$ and $M_2$ in $G$ such that $|M_1\cap X|\not \equiv|M_2\cap X|\ (\mbox{mod } 2)$. For any $V_0\subseteq V$, $X$ is said to be switching-equivalent to $X\oplus \nabla_G(V_0)$, where $\nabla_G(V_0)$ is the set of edges in $G$ each of which has exactly one end in $V_0$ and $A \oplus B$ is the symmetric difference of two sets $A$ and $B$. Lukot'ka and Rollová showed that when $G$ is regular and bipartite, $X$ is non-feasible if and only if $X$ is switching-equivalent to $\emptyset$. This article extends Lukot'ka and Rollová's result by showing that this conclusion holds as long as $G$ is matching-covered and bipartite. This article also studies matching-covered graphs $G$ whose non-feasible edge sets are switching-equivalent to $\emptyset$ or $E$ and partially characterizes these matching-covered graphs in terms of their ear decompositions. Another aim of this article is to construct infinite many $r$-connected and $r$-regular graphs of class 1 containing non-feasible edge sets not switching-equivalent to either $\emptyset$ or $E$ for an arbitrary integer $r$ with $r\ge 3$, which provides negative answers to problems asked by Lukot'ka and Rollová and He, et al respectively.