arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Xinying Hua

4 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2026-06-20 v2
Saturation numbers of some joins of graphs
Let $H$ be a graph. A graph $G$ is $H$-saturated if $G$ is $H$-free, but adding any edge between two non-adjacent vertices of $G$ yields an $H$-copy as a subgraph. The saturation number $\mathrm{sat}(n, H)$ is the minimum number of edges in an $H$-saturated graph on $n$ vertices. The saturation number for the join of a vertex and a graph $F$, denoted by $K_1\vee F$, has attracted considerable attention. Cameron and Puleo [Discrete Math. 345 (2022), 112867] proved that $\mathrm{sat}(n,K_1 \vee F)\le n-1+\mathrm{sat}(n-1, F)$ for $n > |V(F)|$. A natural question is when the above equality holds. Most existing results impose conditions on $F$ and assume that $F$ has no isolated vertices. Let $K_p^-$ be the graph obtained by deleting one edge from the complete graph $K_p$. In this paper, we investigate the saturation number of $K_1\vee F$ when $F$ contains isolated vertices, and determine the exact value of $\mathrm{sat}(n, K_1\vee F)$ when $F=K^-_{3}\cup sK_1(s\ge 1)$ or $F=K^-_{p-1}\cup K_1(p\ge 5)$. In our results, $\mathrm{sat}(n,K_1 \vee F)= n-1+\mathrm{sat}(n-1, F)$ holds when $F=K^-_{3}\cup sK_1$ for any $s\ge 1$, but fails when $F=K^-_{p-1}\cup K_1$ for $p\ge 5$.
2026-06-20 v2
Saturation numbers for joins of graphs and characterization of extremal graphs
A graph $G$ is $H$-saturated if $G$ contains no $H$-copy as a subgraph, but adding any edge between two non-adjacent vertices in $G$ creates a copy of $H$. The saturation number $\mathrm{sat}(n,H)$ is the minimum number of edges in an $n$-vertex $H$-saturated graph. Saturation number for the join of a vertex and a graph $F$, denoted by $K_1\vee F$, has received considerable attention. Cameron and Puleo [Discrete Math. 345 (2022), 112867] showed that $\mathrm{sat}(n,K_1 \vee F)\le n-1+\mathrm{sat}(n-1, F)$ for all $n > |V(F)|$. A natural question is to ask when the above equality holds. Existing results for $\mathrm{sat}(n,K_1 \vee F)$ always constrain that a non-empty graph $F$ contains no isolated vertex. In this paper, we investigate the saturation number of $K_1\vee F$ when a non-empty graph $F$ contains an isolated vertex. We first determine the saturation number for $K_1\vee F$ when $F=K_{p-1}\cup K_1$. When $p=3$, we extend the result to any number of isolated vertices, and determine the saturation number for $K_1\vee F$ when $F=K_{2}\cup qK_1$, or $F=2K_{2}\cup qK_1$ for any $q\ge 1$. Moreover, all minimum saturated graphs are fully characterized. In our results, $\mathrm{sat}(n,K_1 \vee F)= n-1+\mathrm{sat}(n-1, F)$ holds when $F=K_2\cup qK_1$, or $F=2K_2\cup qK_1$ for any $q\ge 1$; but fails when $F=K_{p-1}\cup K_1$ for $p\ge 4$.
2021-12-18
Zero forcing number versus general position number in tree-like graphs
Let ${\rm Z}(G)$ and ${\rm gp}(G)$ be the zero forcing number and the general position number of a graph $G$, respectively. Known results imply that ${\rm gp}(T)\ge {\rm Z}(T) + 1$ holds for every nontrivial tree $T$. It is proved that the result extends to block graphs. For connected, unicyclic graphs $G$ it is proved that ${\rm gp}(G) \ge {\rm Z}(G)$. The result extends neither to bicyclic graphs nor to quasi-trees. Nevertheless, a large class of quasi-trees is found for which ${\rm gp}(G) \ge {\rm Z}(G)$ holds.
2021-11-05 v2
Relating the total domination number and the annihilation number for quasi-trees and some composite graphs
Published • View PublicationBIB
The total domination number $γ_{t}(G)$ of a graph $G$ is the cardinality of a smallest set $D\subseteq V(G)$ such that each vertex of $G$ has a neighbor in $D$. The annihilation number $a(G)$ of $G$ is the largest integer $k$ such that there exist $k$ different vertices in $G$ with the degree sum at most $m(G)$. It is conjectured that $γ_{t}(G)\leq a(G)+1$ holds for every nontrivial connected graph $G$. The conjecture has been proved for graphs with minimum degree at least $3$, trees, certain tree-like graphs, block graphs, and cactus graphs. In the main result of this paper it is proved that the conjecture holds for quasi-trees. The conjecture is verified also for some graph constructions including bijection graphs, Mycielskians, and the newly introduced universally-identifying graphs.