arXiv++ Combinatorics

Browse math.CO papers from arXiv

Papers by Ya-Yang Liu

3 paper(s) by this author · All BibTeX
2026-09-06
Positive Square Energy of Graphs with Minimum Degree at Least Two
Let $s^+(G)$ denote the sum of the squares of the positive adjacency eigenvalues of a graph $G$. The square-energy conjecture of Elphick, Farber, Goldberg, and Wocjan, proved by Liu, Tang, and Zhang, gives a lower bound of $n-1$ for any connected graph of order $n$. We strengthen this bound to $s^+(G)\ge n$ for every connected graph $G$ of order $n$ with minimum degree at least two, unless $G$ is a cycle.
2026-09-03
Positive and Negative Square Energies of $2$-Connected Graphs
Let $G$ be a graph of order $n$, and let $s^+(G)$ and $s^-(G)$ denote the sums of the squares of the positive and negative adjacency eigenvalues of $G$, respectively. Recently, Liu, Tang, and Zhang proved the conjecture of Elphick, Farber, Goldberg, and Wocjan that every connected graph $G$ of order $n$ satisfies $ \min\{s^+(G), s^-(G)\} \ge n-1. $ For positive square energy, we strengthen this result by showing that every $2$-connected graph $G$ of order $n$ which is not a cycle satisfies $s^+(G)\ge n$. The formally analogous assertion for $s^-$ is false: the complete graph $K_n$ satisfies $s^-(K_n)=n-1$. We prove a natural counterpart in the triangle-free class: every triangle-free $2$-connected noncycle $G$ satisfies $ \min\{s^+(G),s^-(G)\}>n. $ More generally, it is enough that some maximum-degree vertex of $G$ belongs to no triangle. Together with the exact square energies of cycles, this characterizes the triangle-free $2$-connected graphs for which $s^-(G)\ge n$; the only exceptions are the cycles $C_{4k+3}$ with $k\geq1$.
2026-08-18
Extremal graphs for a conjecture on the square energy of graphs
For a graph $G$, let $s^+(G)$ and $s^-(G)$ denote the sums of the squares of its positive and negative adjacency eigenvalues. We determine all equality cases in the conjecture of Elphick, Farber, Goldberg, and Wocjan that every connected graph $G$ on $n$ vertices satisfies \[ \min \{s^+(G),s^-(G)\}\ge n-1. \] Namely, equality for $s^+$ holds exactly for trees, whereas equality for $s^-$ holds exactly for trees and complete graphs. The proof combines the $P_3$-removal lemma in the no-cut-vertex case with a detailed equality analysis of the underlying doubly nonnegative matrix inequality. Every block is forced to be complete, and a minimal-counterexample argument gives an exact rank-one decomposition of the folded matrix $M^c$. The resulting non-edge vanishings, together with $AX=XA$, rule out an interface between a bridge and a nontrivial block.